W H K de Vries1, H E J Veeger, C T M Baten, F C T van der Helm. 1. Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime & Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands. w.devries@rrd.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ambulatory 3D orientation estimation with Inertial Magnetic Sensor Units (IMU's) use the earth magnetic field. The magnitude of distortion in orientation in a standard equipped motion lab and its effect on the accuracy of the orientation estimation with IMU's is addressed. METHODS: Orientations of the earth magnetic field vectors were expressed in the laboratory's reference frame. The effect of a distorted earth magnetic field on orientation estimation with IMU's (using both a quaternion and a Kalman fusing algorithm) was compared to orientations derived from an optical system. FINDINGS: The magnetic field varied considerably, with the strongest effects at 5 cm above floor level with a standard deviation in heading of 29 degrees , decreasing to 3 degrees at levels higher than 100 cm. Orientation estimation was poor with the quaternion filter, for the Kalman filter results were acceptable, despite a systematic deterioration over time (after 20-30s). INTERPRETATION: Distortion of the earth magnetic field is depending on construction materials used in the building, and should be taken into account for calibration, alignment to a reference system, and further measurements. Mapping the measurement volume to determine its ferromagnetic characteristics in advance of planned experiments can be the rescue of the data set. CONCLUSIONS: To obtain valid data, "mapping" of the laboratory is essential, although less critical with the Kalman filter and at larger distances (>100 cm) from suspect materials. Measurements should start in a "safe" area and continue no longer than 20-30s in a heavily distorted earth magnetic field.
BACKGROUND: Ambulatory 3D orientation estimation with Inertial Magnetic Sensor Units (IMU's) use the earth magnetic field. The magnitude of distortion in orientation in a standard equipped motion lab and its effect on the accuracy of the orientation estimation with IMU's is addressed. METHODS: Orientations of the earth magnetic field vectors were expressed in the laboratory's reference frame. The effect of a distorted earth magnetic field on orientation estimation with IMU's (using both a quaternion and a Kalman fusing algorithm) was compared to orientations derived from an optical system. FINDINGS: The magnetic field varied considerably, with the strongest effects at 5 cm above floor level with a standard deviation in heading of 29 degrees , decreasing to 3 degrees at levels higher than 100 cm. Orientation estimation was poor with the quaternion filter, for the Kalman filter results were acceptable, despite a systematic deterioration over time (after 20-30s). INTERPRETATION: Distortion of the earth magnetic field is depending on construction materials used in the building, and should be taken into account for calibration, alignment to a reference system, and further measurements. Mapping the measurement volume to determine its ferromagnetic characteristics in advance of planned experiments can be the rescue of the data set. CONCLUSIONS: To obtain valid data, "mapping" of the laboratory is essential, although less critical with the Kalman filter and at larger distances (>100 cm) from suspect materials. Measurements should start in a "safe" area and continue no longer than 20-30s in a heavily distorted earth magnetic field.
Authors: Alberto Ferrari; Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Pietro Garofalo; Michele Raggi; Monique Heijboer; Angelo Cappello; Angelo Davalli Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2009-11-13 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Sjoerd M Bruijn; Warner R Th Ten Kate; Gert S Faber; Onno G Meijer; Peter J Beek; Jaap H van Dieën Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Marion Mundt; Wolf Thomsen; Tom Witter; Arnd Koeppe; Sina David; Franz Bamer; Wolfgang Potthast; Bernd Markert Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Ian Shrier; Patrick Boissy; Simon Brière; Jay Mellette; Luc Fecteau; Gordon O Matheson; Daniel Garza; Willem H Meeuwisse; Eli Segal; John Boulay; Russell J Steele Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Josien C van den Noort; Alberto Ferrari; Andrea G Cutti; Jules G Becher; Jaap Harlaar Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2012-12-09 Impact factor: 2.602