Literature DB >> 33501089

Rowing Simulator Modulates Water Density to Foster Motor Learning.

Ekin Basalp1, Laura Marchal-Crespo1,2, Georg Rauter1,3, Robert Riener1,4, Peter Wolf1.   

Abstract

Although robot-assisted training is present in various fields such as sports engineering and rehabilitation, provision of training strategies that optimally support individual motor learning remains as a challenge. Literature has shown that guidance strategies are useful for beginners, while skilled trainees should benefit from challenging conditions. The Challenge Point Theory also supports this in a way that learning is dependent on the available information, which serves as a challenge to the learner. So, learning can be fostered when the optimal amount of information is given according to the trainee's skill. Even though the framework explains the importance of difficulty modulation, there are no practical guidelines for complex dynamic tasks on how to match the difficulty to the trainee's skill progress. Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the impact on learning of a complex motor task by a modulated task difficulty scheme during the training sessions, without distorting the nature of task. In this 3-day protocol study, we compared two groups of naïve participants for learning a sweep rowing task in a highly sophisticated rowing simulator. During trainings, groups received concurrent visual feedback displaying the requested oar movement. Control group performed the task under constant difficulty in the training sessions. Experimental group's task difficulty was modulated by changing the virtual water density that generated different heaviness of the simulated water-oar interaction, which yielded practice variability. Learning was assessed in terms of spatial and velocity magnitude errors and the variability for these metrics. Results of final day tests revealed that both groups reduced their error and variability for the chosen metrics. Notably, in addition to the provision of a very well established visual feedback and knowledge of results, experimental group's variable training protocol with modulated difficulty showed a potential to be advantageous for the spatial consistency and velocity accuracy. The outcomes of training and test runs indicate that we could successfully alter the performance of the trainees by changing the density value of the virtual water. Therefore, a follow-up study is necessary to investigate how to match different density values to the skill and performance improvement of the participants.
Copyright © 2019 Basalp, Marchal-Crespo, Rauter, Riener and Wolf.

Entities:  

Keywords:  augmented feedback; contextual interference; functional task difficulty; motor learning; practice variability; robot-assisted training; sports engineering

Year:  2019        PMID: 33501089      PMCID: PMC7806073          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  44 in total

1.  Understanding controlled trials: baseline imbalance in randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  C Roberts; D J Torgerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-17

2.  Long-term effects of type of practice on the learning and transfer of a complex motor skill.

Authors:  Daniel Memmert
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2006-12

3.  Learning of Temporal and Spatial Movement Aspects: A Comparison of Four Types of Haptic Control and Concurrent Visual Feedback.

Authors:  Georg Rauter; Roland Sigrist; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 2.487

4.  The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; Mark van Raai; Georg Rauter; Peter Wolf; Robert Riener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy.

Authors:  R B Welch; D H Warren
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Robot-amplified manual exploration improves load identification.

Authors:  F C Huang; J L Patton; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  IFMBE Proc       Date:  2009-09

7.  Effects of robotically modulating kinematic variability on motor skill learning and motivation.

Authors:  Jaime E Duarte; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Too much of a good thing: random practice scheduling and self-control of feedback lead to unique but not additive learning benefits.

Authors:  Asif Ali; Bradley Fawver; Jingu Kim; Jeffrey Fairbrother; Christopher M Janelle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-10

9.  Contextual interference effects with skilled baseball players.

Authors:  K G Hall; D A Domingues; R Cavazos
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1994-06

10.  Haptic Error Modulation Outperforms Visual Error Amplification When Learning a Modified Gait Pattern.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; Panagiotis Tsangaridis; David Obwegeser; Serena Maggioni; Robert Riener
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  1 in total

1.  Congruency of Information Rather Than Body Ownership Enhances Motor Performance in Highly Embodied Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Ingrid A Odermatt; Karin A Buetler; Nicolas Wenk; Özhan Özen; Joaquin Penalver-Andres; Tobias Nef; Fred W Mast; Laura Marchal-Crespo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.