Literature DB >> 24013789

The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task.

Laura Marchal-Crespo1, Mark van Raai, Georg Rauter, Peter Wolf, Robert Riener.   

Abstract

While haptic guidance can improve ongoing performance of a motor task, several studies have found that it ultimately impairs motor learning. However, some recent studies suggest that the haptic demonstration of optimal timing, rather than movement magnitude, enhances learning in subjects trained with haptic guidance. Timing of an action plays a crucial role in the proper accomplishment of many motor skills, such as hitting a moving object (discrete timing task) or learning a velocity profile (time-critical tracking task). The aim of the present study is to evaluate which feedback conditions-visual or haptic guidance-optimize learning of the discrete and continuous elements of a timing task. The experiment consisted in performing a fast tennis forehand stroke in a virtual environment. A tendon-based parallel robot connected to the end of a racket was used to apply haptic guidance during training. In two different experiments, we evaluated which feedback condition was more adequate for learning: (1) a time-dependent discrete task-learning to start a tennis stroke and (2) a tracking task-learning to follow a velocity profile. The effect that the task difficulty and subject's initial skill level have on the selection of the optimal training condition was further evaluated. Results showed that the training condition that maximizes learning of the discrete time-dependent motor task depends on the subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance was especially suitable for less-skilled subjects and in especially difficult discrete tasks, while visual feedback seems to benefit more skilled subjects. Additionally, haptic guidance seemed to promote learning in a time-critical tracking task, while visual feedback tended to deteriorate the performance independently of the task difficulty and subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance outperformed visual feedback, although additional studies are needed to further analyze the effect of other types of feedback visualization on motor learning of time-critical tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24013789     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3690-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Augmented Feedback Presented in a Virtual Environment Accelerates Learning of a Difficult Motor Task.

Authors:  E Todorov; R Shadmehr; E Bizzi
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task.

Authors:  Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effect of feedback on learning a vertebral joint mobilization skill.

Authors:  M Lee; A Moseley; K Refshauge
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1990-02

4.  Physical-guidance benefits in learning a complex motor skill.

Authors:  G Wulf; C H Shea; C A Whitacre
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 5.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review.

Authors:  Roland Sigrist; Georg Rauter; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

6.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal.

Authors:  A W Salmoni; R A Schmidt; C B Walter
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; Stephanie McHughen; Steven C Cramer; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A robotic wheelchair trainer: design overview and a feasibility study.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; Jan Furumasu; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Human-robot cooperative movement training: learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed.

Authors:  Jeremy L Emken; Raul Benitez; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  15 in total

1.  Sonification and haptic feedback in addition to visual feedback enhances complex motor task learning.

Authors:  Roland Sigrist; Georg Rauter; Laura Marchal-Crespo; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Motor learning with fading and growing haptic guidance.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Jenna Lüttgen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effectiveness of robotic training depends on motor task characteristics.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; Nicole Rappo; Robert Riener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of robotically modulating kinematic variability on motor skill learning and motivation.

Authors:  Jaime E Duarte; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Effects of vibrotactile feedback on human learning of arm motions.

Authors:  Karlin Bark; Emily Hyman; Frank Tan; Elizabeth Cha; Steven A Jax; Laurel J Buxbaum; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Comparison of haptic guidance and error amplification robotic trainings for the learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy seniors.

Authors:  Amy E Bouchard; Hélène Corriveau; Marie-Hélène Milot
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-31

7.  Learning a locomotor task: with or without errors?

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; Jasmin Schneider; Lukas Jaeger; Robert Riener
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  A study of the effect of visual depth information on upper limb movement by use of measurement of smoothness.

Authors:  Norio Kato; Toshiaki Tanaka; Syunichi Sugihara; Koichi Shimizu; Nobuki Kudo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-04-28

9.  Configurable, wearable sensing and vibrotactile feedback system for real-time postural balance and gait training: proof-of-concept.

Authors:  Junkai Xu; Tian Bao; Ung Hee Lee; Catherine Kinnaird; Wendy Carender; Yangjian Huang; Kathleen H Sienko; Peter B Shull
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Effect of Error Augmentation on Brain Activation and Motor Learning of a Complex Locomotor Task.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; Lars Michels; Lukas Jaeger; Jorge López-Olóriz; Robert Riener
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.