Literature DB >> 33501086

A Comparison of Individual Learning and Social Learning in Zebrafish Through an Ethorobotics Approach.

Yanpeng Yang1,2, Romain J G Clément2, Stefano Ghirlanda3,4,5, Maurizio Porfiri2,6.   

Abstract

Social learning is ubiquitous across the animal kingdom, where animals learn from group members about predators, foraging strategies, and so on. Despite its prevalence and adaptive benefits, our understanding of social learning is far from complete. Here, we study observational learning in zebrafish, a popular animal model in neuroscience. Toward fine control of experimental variables and high consistency across trials, we developed a novel robotics-based experimental test paradigm, in which a robotic replica demonstrated to live subjects the correct door to join a group of conspecifics. We performed two experimental conditions. In the individual training condition, subjects learned the correct door without the replica. In the social training condition, subjects observed the replica approaching both the incorrect door, to no effect, and the correct door, which would open after spending enough time close to it. During these observations, subjects could not actively follow the replica. Zebrafish increased their preference for the correct door over the course of 20 training sessions, but we failed to identify evidence of social learning, whereby we did not register significant differences in performance between the individual and social training conditions. These results suggest that zebrafish may not be able to learn a route by observation, although more research comparing robots to live demonstrators is needed to substantiate this claim.
Copyright © 2019 Yang, Clément, Ghirlanda and Porfiri.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior; biomimetics; ethorobotics; observational learning; robotics

Year:  2019        PMID: 33501086      PMCID: PMC7805697          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  47 in total

1.  A jump persistent turning walker to model zebrafish locomotion.

Authors:  Violet Mwaffo; Ross P Anderson; Sachit Butail; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Using robots to understand animal cognition.

Authors:  Anna Frohnwieser; John C Murray; Thomas W Pike; Anna Wilkinson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  The zebrafish's swim to fame as an experimental model in biology.

Authors:  S G Vascotto; Y Beckham; G M Kelly
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.626

4.  How different is a 3D-printed replica from a conspecific in the eyes of a zebrafish?

Authors:  Tommaso Ruberto; Giovanni Polverino; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Fish genomics and biology.

Authors:  Hugues Roest Crollius; Jean Weissenbach
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 7.  Modeling anxiety using adult zebrafish: a conceptual review.

Authors:  Adam Stewart; Siddharth Gaikwad; Evan Kyzar; Jeremy Green; Andrew Roth; Allan V Kalueff
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Zebrafish (Danio rerio) responds to the animated image of a predator: towards the development of an automated aversive task.

Authors:  Robert Gerlai; Yohaan Fernandes; Terence Pereira
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Multiple cues produced by a robotic fish modulate aggressive behaviour in Siamese fighting fishes.

Authors:  Donato Romano; Giovanni Benelli; Elisa Donati; Damiano Remorini; Angelo Canale; Cesare Stefanini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Using a robotic fish to investigate individual differences in social responsiveness in the guppy.

Authors:  David Bierbach; Tim Landgraf; Pawel Romanczuk; Juliane Lukas; Hai Nguyen; Max Wolf; Jens Krause
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  3 in total

1.  Social Integrating Robots Suggest Mitigation Strategies for Ecosystem Decay.

Authors:  Thomas Schmickl; Martina Szopek; Francesco Mondada; Rob Mills; Martin Stefanec; Daniel N Hofstadler; Dajana Lazic; Rafael Barmak; Frank Bonnet; Payam Zahadat
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-05-24

2.  Open-source five degree of freedom motion platform for investigating fish-robot interaction.

Authors:  Brent Utter; Alexander Brown
Journal:  HardwareX       Date:  2020-03-18

3.  Opposite valence social information provided by bio-robotic demonstrators shapes selection processes in the green bottle fly.

Authors:  Donato Romano; Giovanni Benelli; Cesare Stefanini
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.118

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.