Literature DB >> 28229461

How different is a 3D-printed replica from a conspecific in the eyes of a zebrafish?

Tommaso Ruberto1, Giovanni Polverino1, Maurizio Porfiri1.   

Abstract

Robotics is emerging as a promising tool for aiding research on animal behavior. The possibility of generating customizable, controllable, and standardized robotic stimuli has been demonstrated through a number of behavioral assays, involving vertebrates and invertebrates. However, the specific appraisal of the nature of robotic stimuli is currently lacking. Here, we attempt to evaluate this aspect in zebrafish, through a within-subject design in which experimental subjects are faced with three experimental conditions. In the first test, we investigated sociability by measuring zebrafish response to a conspecific separated by a one-way glass. In the second test, we studied zebrafish behavior in response to a 3D-printed zebrafish replica actuated along realistic trajectories through a novel four-degree-of-freedom robotic platform. Last, we investigated fear responses in a shelter-seeking test. In agreement with our expectations, zebrafish exhibited an equivalent preference for live and robotic stimuli, and the degree of preference for the robotic replica correlated negatively with the individual propensity to seek shelter. The equivalent preference for the replica and conspecific suggests that the appraisal of the target stimuli is analogous. The preliminary evidence of a correlation between behavioral responses across tests points to the readability of robotics-based approaches to investigate interindividual differences.
© 2017 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Danio rerio; binary choice; robotics; shelter-seeking; social behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28229461     DOI: 10.1002/jeab.247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  Design and development of a robotic predator as a stimulus in conditioned place aversion for the study of the effect of ethanol and citalopram in zebrafish.

Authors:  Romain J G Clément; Simone Macrì; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Behavioural and life-history responses of mosquitofish to biologically inspired and interactive robotic predators.

Authors:  Giovanni Polverino; Mert Karakaya; Chiara Spinello; Vrishin R Soman; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Model-based feedback control of live zebrafish behavior via interaction with a robotic replica.

Authors:  Pietro DeLellis; Edoardo Cadolini; Arrigo Croce; Yanpeng Yang; Mario di Bernardo; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Robot       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.567

4.  Acute Citalopram administration modulates anxiety in response to the context associated with a robotic stimulus in zebrafish.

Authors:  Mert Karakaya; Andrea Scaramuzzi; Simone Macrì; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.201

5.  Multiple cues produced by a robotic fish modulate aggressive behaviour in Siamese fighting fishes.

Authors:  Donato Romano; Giovanni Benelli; Elisa Donati; Damiano Remorini; Angelo Canale; Cesare Stefanini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  The zebrafish subcortical social brain as a model for studying social behavior disorders.

Authors:  Yijie Geng; Randall T Peterson
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 5.758

7.  Closed-loop control of zebrafish behaviour in three dimensions using a robotic stimulus.

Authors:  Changsu Kim; Tommaso Ruberto; Paul Phamduy; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Social interactions between live and artificial weakly electric fish: Electrocommunication and locomotor behavior of Mormyrus rume proboscirostris towards a mobile dummy fish.

Authors:  Martin Worm; Frank Kirschbaum; Gerhard von der Emde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Benefits and limitations of three-dimensional printing technology for ecological research.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Behm; Brenna R Waite; S Tonia Hsieh; Matthew R Helmus
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.964

10.  Using a robotic fish to investigate individual differences in social responsiveness in the guppy.

Authors:  David Bierbach; Tim Landgraf; Pawel Romanczuk; Juliane Lukas; Hai Nguyen; Max Wolf; Jens Krause
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.