Bianca R P Brown1,2, Joaquin C B Nunez3,4, David M Rand5. 1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, 80 Waterman St., Providence, RI, 02912, USA. bianca_brown@brown.edu. 2. Institute at Brown for Environment and Society, Brown University, 85 Waterman St., Providence, RI, 02912, USA. bianca_brown@brown.edu. 3. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, 80 Waterman St., Providence, RI, 02912, USA. 4. Department of Biology, University of Virginia, 485 McCormick Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA. 5. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, 80 Waterman St., Providence, RI, 02912, USA. david_rand@brown.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Natural populations inhabiting the rocky intertidal experience multiple ecological stressors and provide an opportunity to investigate how environmental differences influence microbiomes over small geographical scales. However, very few microbiome studies focus on animals that inhabit the intertidal. In this study, we investigate the microbiome of the intertidal barnacle Semibalanus balanoides. We first describe the microbiome of two body tissues: the feeding appendages, or cirri, and the gut. Next, we examine whether there are differences between the microbiome of each body tissue of barnacles collected from the thermally extreme microhabitats of the rocky shores' upper and lower tidal zones. RESULTS: Overall, the microbiome of S. balanoides consisted of 18 phyla from 408 genera. Our results showed that although cirri and gut microbiomes shared a portion of their amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), the microbiome of each body tissue was distinct. Over 80% of the ASVs found in the cirri were also found in the gut, and 44% of the ASVs found in the gut were also found in the cirri. Notably, the gut microbiome was not a subset of the cirri microbiome. Additionally, we identified that the cirri microbiome was responsive to microhabitat differences. CONCLUSION: Results from this study indicate that S. balanoides maintains distinct microbiomes in its cirri and gut tissues, and that the gut microbiome is more stable than the cirri microbiome between the extremes of the intertidal.
BACKGROUND: Natural populations inhabiting the rocky intertidal experience multiple ecological stressors and provide an opportunity to investigate how environmental differences influence microbiomes over small geographical scales. However, very few microbiome studies focus on animals that inhabit the intertidal. In this study, we investigate the microbiome of the intertidal barnacle Semibalanus balanoides. We first describe the microbiome of two body tissues: the feeding appendages, or cirri, and the gut. Next, we examine whether there are differences between the microbiome of each body tissue of barnacles collected from the thermally extreme microhabitats of the rocky shores' upper and lower tidal zones. RESULTS: Overall, the microbiome of S. balanoides consisted of 18 phyla from 408 genera. Our results showed that although cirri and gut microbiomes shared a portion of their amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), the microbiome of each body tissue was distinct. Over 80% of the ASVs found in the cirri were also found in the gut, and 44% of the ASVs found in the gut were also found in the cirri. Notably, the gut microbiome was not a subset of the cirri microbiome. Additionally, we identified that the cirri microbiome was responsive to microhabitat differences. CONCLUSION: Results from this study indicate that S. balanoides maintains distinct microbiomes in its cirri and gut tissues, and that the gut microbiome is more stable than the cirri microbiome between the extremes of the intertidal.
Authors: Margaret McFall-Ngai; Michael G Hadfield; Thomas C G Bosch; Hannah V Carey; Tomislav Domazet-Lošo; Angela E Douglas; Nicole Dubilier; Gerard Eberl; Tadashi Fukami; Scott F Gilbert; Ute Hentschel; Nicole King; Staffan Kjelleberg; Andrew H Knoll; Natacha Kremer; Sarkis K Mazmanian; Jessica L Metcalf; Kenneth Nealson; Naomi E Pierce; John F Rawls; Ann Reid; Edward G Ruby; Mary Rumpho; Jon G Sanders; Diethard Tautz; Jennifer J Wernegreen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Brian D Muegge; Justin Kuczynski; Dan Knights; Jose C Clemente; Antonio González; Luigi Fontana; Bernard Henrissat; Rob Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon Journal: Science Date: 2011-05-20 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Juliet Brodie; Christopher Williamson; Gary L Barker; Rachel H Walker; Andrew Briscoe; Marian Yallop Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 4.194
Authors: Benjamin J Callahan; Paul J McMurdie; Michael J Rosen; Andrew W Han; Amy Jo A Johnson; Susan P Holmes Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Joaquin C B Nunez; Stephen Rong; David A Ferranti; Alejandro Damian-Serrano; Kimberly B Neil; Henrik Glenner; Rebecca G Elyanow; Bianca R P Brown; Magnus Alm Rosenblad; Anders Blomberg; Kerstin Johannesson; David M Rand Journal: Mol Ecol Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 6.622