Literature DB >> 33497591

What you see is where you go: visibility influences movement decisions of a forest bird navigating a three-dimensional-structured matrix.

Job Aben1, Johannes Signer2, Janne Heiskanen3,4, Petri Pellikka3,4, Justin M J Travis5.   

Abstract

Animal spatial behaviour is often presumed to reflect responses to visual cues. However, inference of behaviour in relation to the environment is challenged by the lack of objective methods to identify the information that effectively is available to an animal from a given location. In general, animals are assumed to have unconstrained information on the environment within a detection circle of a certain radius (the perceptual range; PR). However, visual cues are only available up to the first physical obstruction within an animal's PR, making information availability a function of an animal's location within the physical environment (the effective visual perceptual range; EVPR). By using LiDAR data and viewshed analysis, we modelled forest birds' EVPRs at each step along a movement path. We found that the EVPR was on average 0.063% that of an unconstrained PR and, by applying a step-selection analysis, that individuals are 1.55 times more likely to move to a tree within their EVPR than to an equivalent tree outside it. This demonstrates that behavioural choices can be substantially impacted by the characteristics of an individual's EVPR and highlights that inferences made from movement data may be improved by accounting for the EVPR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LiDAR; animal movement behaviour; habitat selection; perceptual range; step-selection function; viewshed analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33497591      PMCID: PMC7876602          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  14 in total

1.  Optimizing the use of biologgers for movement ecology research.

Authors:  Hannah J Williams; Lucy A Taylor; Simon Benhamou; Allert I Bijleveld; Thomas A Clay; Sophie de Grissac; Urška Demšar; Holly M English; Novella Franconi; Agustina Gómez-Laich; Rachael C Griffiths; William P Kay; Juan Manuel Morales; Jonathan R Potts; Katharine F Rogerson; Christian Rutz; Anouk Spelt; Alice M Trevail; Rory P Wilson; Luca Börger
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 2.  The sensory ecology of adaptive landscapes.

Authors:  Lyndon A Jordan; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Space-use behaviour of woodland caribou based on a cognitive movement model.

Authors:  Tal Avgar; James A Baker; Glen S Brown; Jevon S Hagens; Andrew M Kittle; Erin E Mallon; Madeleine T McGreer; Anna Mosser; Steven G Newmaster; Brent R Patterson; Douglas E B Reid; Art R Rodgers; Jennifer Shuter; Garrett M Street; Ian Thompson; Merritt J Turetsky; Philip A Wiebe; John M Fryxell
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Linking behaviour to dynamics of populations and communities: application of novel approaches in behavioural ecology to conservation.

Authors:  Jakob Bro-Jørgensen; Daniel W Franks; Kristine Meise
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: Efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using Bayesian or frequentist computation.

Authors:  Stefanie Muff; Johannes Signer; John Fieberg
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Human selection of elk behavioural traits in a landscape of fear.

Authors:  Simone Ciuti; Tyler B Muhly; Dale G Paton; Allan D McDevitt; Marco Musiani; Mark S Boyce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behaviour within and outside habitat in a specialist butterfly.

Authors:  Nicolas Schtickzelle; Augustin Joiris; Hans Van Dyck; Michel Baguette
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Patch size, functional isolation, visibility and matrix permeability influences neotropical primate occurrence within highly fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  Lucas Goulart da Silva; Milton Cezar Ribeiro; Érica Hasui; Carla Aparecida da Costa; Rogério Grassetto Teixeira da Cunha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Tree-centric mapping of forest carbon density from airborne laser scanning and hyperspectral data.

Authors:  Michele Dalponte; David A Coomes
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 7.781

10.  Animal movement tools (amt): R package for managing tracking data and conducting habitat selection analyses.

Authors:  Johannes Signer; John Fieberg; Tal Avgar
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  2 in total

1.  What you see is where you go: visibility influences movement decisions of a forest bird navigating a three-dimensional-structured matrix.

Authors:  Job Aben; Johannes Signer; Janne Heiskanen; Petri Pellikka; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Foraging on the wing for fish while migrating over changing landscapes: traveling behaviors vary with available aquatic habitat for Caspian terns.

Authors:  C Rueda-Uribe; U Lötberg; S Åkesson
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.600

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.