Literature DB >> 31454066

Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: Efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using Bayesian or frequentist computation.

Stefanie Muff1,2, Johannes Signer3, John Fieberg4.   

Abstract

Popular frameworks for studying habitat selection include resource-selection functions (RSFs) and step-selection functions (SSFs), estimated using logistic and conditional logistic regression, respectively. Both frameworks compare environmental covariates associated with locations animals visit with environmental covariates at a set of locations assumed available to the animals. Conceptually, slopes that vary by individual, that is, random coefficient models, could be used to accommodate inter-individual heterogeneity with either approach. While fitting such models for RSFs is possible with standard software for generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMMs), straightforward and efficient one-step procedures for fitting SSFs with random coefficients are currently lacking. To close this gap, we take advantage of the fact that the conditional logistic regression model (i.e. the SSF) is likelihood-equivalent to a Poisson model with stratum-specific fixed intercepts. By interpreting the intercepts as a random effect with a large (fixed) variance, inference for random-slope models becomes feasible with standard Bayesian techniques, or with frequentist methods that allow one to fix the variance of a random effect. We compare this approach to other commonly applied alternatives, including models without random slopes and mixed conditional regression models fit using a two-step algorithm. Using data from mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) and Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra), we illustrate that our models lead to valid and feasible inference. In addition, we conduct a simulation study to compare different estimation approaches for SSFs and to demonstrate the importance of including individual-specific slopes when estimating individual- and population-level habitat-selection parameters. By providing coded examples using integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA) and Template Model Builder (TMB) for Bayesian and frequentist analysis via the R packages R-INLA and glmmTMB, we hope to make efficient estimation of RSFs and SSFs with random effects accessible to anyone in the field. SSFs with individual-specific coefficients are particularly attractive since they can provide insights into movement and habitat-selection processes at fine-spatial and temporal scales, but these models had previously been very challenging to fit.
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conditional logistic regression; glmmTMB; integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA); multinomial regression; random effects; resource-selection functions; step-selection functions

Year:  2019        PMID: 31454066     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  24 in total

1.  Individual differences in habitat selection mediate landscape level predictions of a functional response.

Authors:  Levi Newediuk; Christina M Prokopenko; Eric Vander Wal
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Green-up selection by red deer in heterogeneous, human-dominated landscapes of Central Europe.

Authors:  Benjamin Sigrist; Claudio Signer; Sascha D Wellig; Arpat Ozgul; Flurin Filli; Hannes Jenny; Dominik Thiel; Sven Wirthner; Roland F Graf
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 3.  Conceptual and methodological advances in habitat-selection modeling: guidelines for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Joseph M Northrup; Eric Vander Wal; Maegwin Bonar; John Fieberg; Michel P Laforge; Martin Leclerc; Christina M Prokopenko; Brian D Gerber
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 6.105

4.  What you see is where you go: visibility influences movement decisions of a forest bird navigating a three-dimensional-structured matrix.

Authors:  Job Aben; Johannes Signer; Janne Heiskanen; Petri Pellikka; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Increasing fire frequency and severity will increase habitat loss for a boreal forest indicator species.

Authors:  Eric C Palm; Michael J Suitor; Kyle Joly; Jim D Herriges; Allicia P Kelly; Dave Hervieux; Kelsey L M Russell; Torsten W Bentzen; Nicholas C Larter; Mark Hebblewhite
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.105

6.  Towards the restoration of the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor for large mammals in Panama: comparing multi-species occupancy to movement models.

Authors:  Ninon F V Meyer; Ricardo Moreno; Rafael Reyna-Hurtado; Johannes Signer; Niko Balkenhol
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.600

7.  Insect-mediated apparent competition between mammals in a boreal food web.

Authors:  Guillemette Labadie; Philip D McLoughlin; Mark Hebblewhite; Daniel Fortin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Landscape transformations produce favorable roosting conditions for turkey vultures and black vultures.

Authors:  Jacob E Hill; Kenneth F Kellner; Bryan M Kluever; Michael L Avery; John S Humphrey; Eric A Tillman; Travis L DeVault; Jerrold L Belant
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Visitation of artificial watering points by the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in semiarid Australia.

Authors:  David A Roshier; Johannes Signer; Andrew Carter
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  The density of anthropogenic features explains seasonal and behaviour-based functional responses in selection of linear features by a social predator.

Authors:  Karine E Pigeon; D MacNearney; M Hebblewhite; M Musiani; L Neufeld; J Cranston; G Stenhouse; F Schmiegelow; L Finnegan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.