Literature DB >> 33497438

Comparison of methods for estimating genetic correlation between complex traits using GWAS summary statistics.

Yiliang Zhang1, Youshu Cheng1, Wei Jiang1, Yixuan Ye2, Qiongshi Lu3,4,5, Hongyu Zhao1,2,6.   

Abstract

Genetic correlation is the correlation of phenotypic effects by genetic variants across the genome on two phenotypes. It is an informative metric to quantify the overall genetic similarity between complex traits, which provides insights into their polygenic genetic architecture. Several methods have been proposed to estimate genetic correlation based on data collected from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Due to the easy access of GWAS summary statistics and computational efficiency, methods only requiring GWAS summary statistics as input have become more popular than methods utilizing individual-level genotype data. Here, we present a benchmark study for different summary-statistics-based genetic correlation estimation methods through simulation and real data applications. We focus on two major technical challenges in estimating genetic correlation: marker dependency caused by linkage disequilibrium (LD) and sample overlap between different studies. To assess the performance of different methods in the presence of these two challenges, we first conducted comprehensive simulations with diverse LD patterns and sample overlaps. Then we applied these methods to real GWAS summary statistics for a wide spectrum of complex traits. Based on these experiments, we conclude that methods relying on accurate LD estimation are less robust in real data applications due to the imprecision of LD obtained from reference panels. Our findings offer guidance on how to choose appropriate methods for genetic correlation estimation in post-GWAS analysis.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GWAS summary statistics; benchmarking; complex traits; genetic correlation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33497438      PMCID: PMC8425307          DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  43 in total

1.  The interpretation of twin data.

Authors:  O KEMPTHORNE; R H OSBORNE
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Measuring missing heritability: inferring the contribution of common variants.

Authors:  David Golan; Eric S Lander; Saharon Rosset
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  High-definition likelihood inference of genetic correlations across human complex traits.

Authors:  Zheng Ning; Yudi Pawitan; Xia Shen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Relation between BMI and diabetes mellitus and its complications among US older adults.

Authors:  Natallia Gray; Gabriel Picone; Frank Sloan; Arseniy Yashkin
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Conditional analysis of multiple quantitative traits based on marginal GWAS summary statistics.

Authors:  Yangqing Deng; Wei Pan
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 6.  2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Joint modeling of genetically correlated diseases and functional annotations increases accuracy of polygenic risk prediction.

Authors:  Yiming Hu; Qiongshi Lu; Wei Liu; Yuhua Zhang; Mo Li; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  SumHer better estimates the SNP heritability of complex traits from summary statistics.

Authors:  Doug Speed; David J Balding
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Jakob Grove; Stephan Ripke; Thomas D Als; Manuel Mattheisen; Raymond K Walters; Hyejung Won; Jonatan Pallesen; Esben Agerbo; Ole A Andreassen; Richard Anney; Swapnil Awashti; Rich Belliveau; Francesco Bettella; Joseph D Buxbaum; Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm; Marie Bækvad-Hansen; Felecia Cerrato; Kimberly Chambert; Jane H Christensen; Claire Churchhouse; Karin Dellenvall; Ditte Demontis; Silvia De Rubeis; Bernie Devlin; Srdjan Djurovic; Ashley L Dumont; Jacqueline I Goldstein; Christine S Hansen; Mads Engel Hauberg; Mads V Hollegaard; Sigrun Hope; Daniel P Howrigan; Hailiang Huang; Christina M Hultman; Lambertus Klei; Julian Maller; Joanna Martin; Alicia R Martin; Jennifer L Moran; Mette Nyegaard; Terje Nærland; Duncan S Palmer; Aarno Palotie; Carsten Bøcker Pedersen; Marianne Giørtz Pedersen; Timothy dPoterba; Jesper Buchhave Poulsen; Beate St Pourcain; Per Qvist; Karola Rehnström; Abraham Reichenberg; Jennifer Reichert; Elise B Robinson; Kathryn Roeder; Panos Roussos; Evald Saemundsen; Sven Sandin; F Kyle Satterstrom; George Davey Smith; Hreinn Stefansson; Stacy Steinberg; Christine R Stevens; Patrick F Sullivan; Patrick Turley; G Bragi Walters; Xinyi Xu; Kari Stefansson; Daniel H Geschwind; Merete Nordentoft; David M Hougaard; Thomas Werge; Ole Mors; Preben Bo Mortensen; Benjamin M Neale; Mark J Daly; Anders D Børglum
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Joint analysis of psychiatric disorders increases accuracy of risk prediction for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Robert Maier; Gerhard Moser; Guo-Bo Chen; Stephan Ripke; William Coryell; James B Potash; William A Scheftner; Jianxin Shi; Myrna M Weissman; Christina M Hultman; Mikael Landén; Douglas F Levinson; Kenneth S Kendler; Jordan W Smoller; Naomi R Wray; S Hong Lee
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 11.043

View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantifying concordant genetic effects of de novo mutations on multiple disorders.

Authors:  Hanmin Guo; Lin Hou; Yu Shi; Sheng Chih Jin; Xue Zeng; Boyang Li; Richard P Lifton; Martina Brueckner; Hongyu Zhao; Qiongshi Lu
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Leveraging LD eigenvalue regression to improve the estimation of SNP heritability and confounding inflation.

Authors:  Shuang Song; Wei Jiang; Yiliang Zhang; Lin Hou; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 11.043

3.  Fast estimation of genetic correlation for biobank-scale data.

Authors:  Yue Wu; Kathryn S Burch; Andrea Ganna; Päivi Pajukanta; Bogdan Pasaniuc; Sriram Sankararaman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 11.025

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.