Natallia Gray1, Gabriel Picone1, Frank Sloan1, Arseniy Yashkin1. 1. From the Department of Economics and Finance, Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, the Department of Economics, University of South Florida, Tampa, and the Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study examined relations between elevated body mass index (BMI) and time to diagnosis with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications among older adults in the United States. METHODS: Data came from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, 1991-2010. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess relations between excess BMI at the first Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey interview and time to diabetes mellitus diagnosis, complications, and insulin dependence among Medicare beneficiaries, older than 65 years of age with no prior diabetes mellitus diagnosis, and who were not enrolled in Medicare Advantage (N = 14,657). RESULTS: Among individuals diagnosed as having diabetes mellitus, elevated BMIs were associated with a progressively higher risk of complications from diabetes mellitus. For women with a BMI ≥40, the risk of insulin dependence (hazard ratio [HR] 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.36-5.39) was twice that for women with 25 ≤ BMI < 27.5 (HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.33-2.33). A similar pattern was observed in risk of cardiovascular (25 ≤ BMI < 27.5: HR 1.34; 95% CI 1.15-1.54; BMI ≥40: HR 2.45; 95% CI 1.92-3.11), cerebrovascular (25 ≤ BMI < 27.5: HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.06-1.57; BMI ≥40: HR 2.00; 95% CI 1.42-2.81), renal (25 ≤ BMI < 27.5: HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.04-1.63; BMI ≥40: HR 2.23; 95% CI 1.54-3.22), and lower extremity complications (25 ≤ BMI < 27.5: HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.22-1.61; BMI ≥40: HR 2.95; 95% CI 2.35-3.69). CONCLUSIONS: Any increase in BMI above normal weight levels is associated with an increased risk of being diagnosed as having complications of diabetes mellitus. For men, the increased risk of these complications occurred at higher BMI levels than in women. Ocular complications occurred at higher BMI levels than other complication types in both men and women.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined relations between elevated body mass index (BMI) and time to diagnosis with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications among older adults in the United States. METHODS: Data came from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, 1991-2010. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess relations between excess BMI at the first Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey interview and time to diabetes mellitus diagnosis, complications, and insulin dependence among Medicare beneficiaries, older than 65 years of age with no prior diabetes mellitus diagnosis, and who were not enrolled in Medicare Advantage (N = 14,657). RESULTS: Among individuals diagnosed as having diabetes mellitus, elevated BMIs were associated with a progressively higher risk of complications from diabetes mellitus. For women with a BMI ≥40, the risk of insulin dependence (hazard ratio [HR] 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.36-5.39) was twice that for women with 25 ≤ BMI < 27.5 (HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.33-2.33). A similar pattern was observed in risk of cardiovascular (25 ≤ BMI < 27.5: HR 1.34; 95% CI 1.15-1.54; BMI ≥40: HR 2.45; 95% CI 1.92-3.11), cerebrovascular (25 ≤ BMI < 27.5: HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.06-1.57; BMI ≥40: HR 2.00; 95% CI 1.42-2.81), renal (25 ≤ BMI < 27.5: HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.04-1.63; BMI ≥40: HR 2.23; 95% CI 1.54-3.22), and lower extremity complications (25 ≤ BMI < 27.5: HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.22-1.61; BMI ≥40: HR 2.95; 95% CI 2.35-3.69). CONCLUSIONS: Any increase in BMI above normal weight levels is associated with an increased risk of being diagnosed as having complications of diabetes mellitus. For men, the increased risk of these complications occurred at higher BMI levels than in women. Ocular complications occurred at higher BMI levels than other complication types in both men and women.
Authors: Deepak Patel; Estelle V Lambert; Roseanne da Silva; Mike Greyling; Tracy Kolbe-Alexander; Adam Noach; Jaco Conradie; Craig Nossel; Jill Borresen; Thomas Gaziano Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2011 May-Jun
Authors: Eric A Finkelstein; Olga A Khavjou; Hope Thompson; Justin G Trogdon; Liping Pan; Bettylou Sherry; William Dietz Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Lawrence J Appel; Jeanne M Clark; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Nae-Yuh Wang; Janelle W Coughlin; Gail Daumit; Edgar R Miller; Arlene Dalcin; Gerald J Jerome; Steven Geller; Gary Noronha; Thomas Pozefsky; Jeanne Charleston; Jeffrey B Reynolds; Nowella Durkin; Richard R Rubin; Thomas A Louis; Frederick L Brancati Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daphne P Guh; Wei Zhang; Nick Bansback; Zubin Amarsi; C Laird Birmingham; Aslam H Anis Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Catherine C Cowie; Keith F Rust; Earl S Ford; Mark S Eberhardt; Danita D Byrd-Holt; Chaoyang Li; Desmond E Williams; Edward W Gregg; Kathleen E Bainbridge; Sharon H Saydah; Linda S Geiss Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Ryan T Crews; Kristin L Schneider; Sai V Yalla; Neil D Reeves; Loretta Vileikyte Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 4.876
Authors: Tara S Rogers-Soeder; Nancy E Lane; Mona Walimbe; Ann V Schwartz; Irina Tolstykh; David T Felson; Cora E Lewis; Neil A Segal; Michael C Nevitt Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Christina R Whitehouse; Nancy C Sharts-Hopko; Suzanne C Smeltzer; David A Horowitz Journal: Res Gerontol Nurs Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 1.571