Literature DB >> 33494832

Blinding in electric current stimulation in subacute neglect patients with current densities of 0.8 A/m2: a cross-over pilot study.

Anna Gorsler1,2, Ulrike Grittner3,4, Nadine Külzow5, Torsten Rackoll6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Neglect after stroke is a disabling disorder and its rehabilitation is a major challenge. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) seems to be a promising adjuvant technique to improve standard care neglect therapy. Since electric fields are influenced by age-related factors, higher current densities are probably needed for effective treatment in aged stroke patients. Validation of treatment efficacy requires sham-controlled experiments, but increased current densities might comprise blinding. Therefore, a pilot study was conducted to test sham adequacy when using current density of 0.8 A/m2. Whether especially neglect patients who mainly suffer from perceptual and attentional deficits are able to differentiate beyond chance active from sham tDCS was investigated in a randomized cross-over design (active/sham stimulation) in 12 early subacute patients with left-sided hemineglect. Stimulation (0.8 A/m2) was performed simultaneous to standard care neglect therapy.
RESULTS: Odds ratio of correct guessing an atDCS condition compared to wrongly judge an atDCS condition as sham was 10.00 (95%CI 0.65-154.40, p = 0.099). However, given the small sample size and high OR, although likely somewhat overestimated, results require careful interpretation and blinding success in neglect studies with current densities of 0.8 A/m2 should be further confirmed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blinding procedure; Pilot study; Stroke; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Visuospatial neglect

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33494832      PMCID: PMC7836170          DOI: 10.1186/s13104-020-05421-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of blinding effectiveness between sham tDCS and placebo sertraline in a 6-week major depression randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  André Russowsky Brunoni; Pedro Schestatsky; Paulo Andrade Lotufo; Isabela Martins Benseñor; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Impact of neglect on functional outcome after stroke: a review of methodological issues and recent research findings.

Authors:  M Jehkonen; M Laihosalo; J E Kettunen
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Efficacy of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Unilateral Neglect After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jingjing Fan; Yi Li; Yonghong Yang; Yun Qu; Shasha Li
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects.

Authors:  Anna Fertonani; Clarissa Ferrari; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Direct current stimulation-induced synaptic plasticity in the sensorimotor cortex: structure follows function.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin Gellner; Janine Reis; Carsten Holtick; Charlotte Schubert; Brita Fritsch
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect.

Authors:  B Wilson; J Cockburn; P Halligan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 7.  tDCS in post-stroke aphasia: the role of stimulation parameters, behavioral treatment and patient characteristics.

Authors:  Vânia de Aguiar; Caterina Laura Paolazzi; Gabriele Miceli
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 8.  Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke.

Authors:  Audrey Bowen; Christine Hazelton; Alex Pollock; Nadina B Lincoln
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-01

9.  Visuospatial Neglect - a Theory-Informed Overview of Current and Emerging Strategies and a Systematic Review on the Therapeutic Use of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Paul Theo Zebhauser; Marine Vernet; Evelyn Unterburger; Anna-Katharine Brem
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 10.  Safety Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke.

Authors:  Cristina Russo; Maíra I Souza Carneiro; Nadia Bolognini; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.