Literature DB >> 26975193

Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Short Forms in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Alessandro Chiarotto1, Carla Vanti2, Christine Cedraschi3, Silvano Ferrari4, Fernanda de Lima E Sà Resende2, Raymond W Ostelo5, Paolo Pillastrini2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is a valid and reliable patient-reported instrument used to assess pain self-efficacy in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Recently, the 2-item (PSEQ-2) and the 4-item (PSEQ-4) short versions were developed showing satisfactory measurement properties in mixed populations with chronic pain. The aim of this study was to examine responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC) of PSEQ, PSEQ-2, and PSEQ-4 in patients with CLBP. We used a sample of 104 patients undergoing multimodal physical therapy designed to partly change pain self-efficacy beliefs. Responsiveness was assessed by testing 16 a priori formulated hypotheses regarding effect sizes, areas under the curve, and correlations with changes in other instruments measuring other constructs. The MIC was calculated using an external anchor specific for pain self-efficacy and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) method. The PSEQ and the PSEQ-4 met all hypotheses, whereas the PSEQ-2 met all but 1. The MICs were 5.5 for the PSEQ (9% of the scale range) and 1.5 for PSEQ-2 (13% scale range) and PSEQ-4 (6% scale range). MIC values were different for patients with low or high baseline values for all 3 instruments. The PSEQ and its short versions are adequately responsive instruments in patients with CLBP. PERSPECTIVE: This study suggests that the PSEQ and its short versions are responsive measures of pain self-efficacy in patients with CLBP, adding to previous literature on their validity and reliability. Considering their similar responsiveness, the 4-item PSEQ could replace the original 10-item version in busy clinical or research settings.
Copyright © 2016 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic low back pain; measurement; pain self-efficacy; short forms

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26975193     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  16 in total

1.  Development and Evaluation of the Eight-Item Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES-8).

Authors:  Philip L Ritter; Khushboo Sheth; Anita L Stewart; Dolores Gallagher-Thompson; Kate Lorig
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2022-03-28

2.  Changes in Pain Self-Efficacy, Coping Skills, and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Yoga, Physical Therapy, and Education for Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Allison Marshall; Christopher T Joyce; Bryan Tseng; Hanna Gerlovin; Gloria Y Yeh; Karen J Sherman; Robert B Saper; Eric J Roseen
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.637

3.  The effectiveness of generic self-management interventions for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain on physical function, self-efficacy, pain intensity and physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Elbers; H Wittink; J J M Pool; R J E M Smeets
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  Multidisciplinary pain management program for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in Japan: a cohort study.

Authors:  Naoto Takahashi; Kozue Takatsuki; Satoshi Kasahara; Shoji Yabuki
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Is there a relationship between self-efficacy, disability, pain and sociodemographic characteristics in chronic low back pain? A multicenter retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Silvano Ferrari; Carla Vanti; Marta Pellizzer; Luca Dozza; Marco Monticone; Paolo Pillastrini
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2019-10-12

6.  Cross-cultural translation, adaptation, and validation of the Amharic version pain self-efficacy questionnaire in people with low back pain in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mulugeta Bayisa Chala; Catherine Donnelly; Yemataw Wondie; Setareh Ghahari; Jordan Miller
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  A Two Question Screen for Mental Health Opportunities.

Authors:  Prakash Jayakumar; Joost T P Kortlever; Laura E Brown; David Ring
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-05

8.  Responsiveness and minimal important change of the QuickDASH and PSFS when used among patients with shoulder pain.

Authors:  Tarjei Rysstad; Margreth Grotle; Lars Petter Klokk; Anne Therese Tveter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Does the awareness of having a lumbar spondylolisthesis influence self-efficacy and kinesiophobia? A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Silvano Ferrari; Rosa Striano; Eric Lucking; Paolo Pillastrini; Marco Monticone; Carla Vanti
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2019-12-16

10.  The (cost-)effectiveness and cost-utility of a novel integrative care initiative for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: the pragmatic trial protocol of Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg.

Authors:  Cynthia Lamper; Ivan P J Huijnen; Mariëlle E J B Goossens; Bjorn Winkens; Dirk Ruwaard; Jeanine A M C F Verbunt; Mariëlle E Kroese
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.