Literature DB >> 33493239

Comparative analysis on environmental and economic performance of agricultural cooperatives and smallholder farmers: The case of grape production in Hebei, China.

Lei Deng1, Lei Chen1, Jingjie Zhao2,3, Ruimei Wang4.   

Abstract

Agricultural modernization and intensification have been regarded as a significant way to support agricultural development and improve farm income in China. Agricultural cooperatives have played an important role in promoting the modernization and intensification of Chinese agricultural sector. Given the increasing concerns about environmental harm, however, it still remains unclear whether and the extent to which agricultural cooperatives contributes to reducing environmental impacts of agricultural production. Hence, this study performed an environmental evaluation using life cycle assessment for three different organization forms of grape production in Changli County, Hebei Province, China: smallholder farmers, farmer-owned cooperatives and investor-owned firm-led cooperatives. Then the results of life cycle assessment were monetarized and cost benefit analysis was used to evaluate the economic performance of these three organization forms of grape production. The results demonstrate that investor-owned firm-led cooperatives present an overall improvement in environmental and economic performance with the lowest weighted environmental index (integrating all impact categories into a single score), the highest net profit and the highest total net benefit. The results also show a difference in potential improvement in environmental impacts and economic returns between cooperatives and smallholder farmers. Additionally, the production and application of organic and chemical fertilizer and pesticide have been identified as major contributors to total environmental damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33493239      PMCID: PMC7833222          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  12 in total

1.  Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products--are the differences captured by life cycle assessment?

Authors:  Matthias S Meier; Franziska Stoessel; Niels Jungbluth; Ronnie Juraske; Christian Schader; Matthias Stolze
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 2.  Emerging role of Geographical Information System (GIS), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and spatial LCA (GIS-LCA) in sustainable bioenergy planning.

Authors:  Moonmoon Hiloidhari; D C Baruah; Anoop Singh; Sampriti Kataki; Kristina Medhi; Shilpi Kumari; T V Ramachandra; B M Jenkins; Indu Shekhar Thakur
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  Knowledge training and the change of fertilizer use intensity: Evidence from wheat farmers in China.

Authors:  Dan Pan; Fanbin Kong; Ning Zhang; Ruiyao Ying
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Combined life cycle assessment and artificial intelligence for prediction of output energy and environmental impacts of sugarcane production.

Authors:  Ali Kaab; Mohammad Sharifi; Hossein Mobli; Ashkan Nabavi-Pelesaraei; Kwok-Wing Chau
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Can farmers mitigate environmental impacts through combined production of food, fuel and feed? A consequential life cycle assessment of integrated mixed crop-livestock system with a green biorefinery.

Authors:  Ranjan Parajuli; Tommy Dalgaard; Morten Birkved
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Sensitivity analysis in a life cycle assessment of an aged red wine production from Catalonia, Spain.

Authors:  M Meneses; C M Torres; F Castells
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Integration of artificial intelligence methods and life cycle assessment to predict energy output and environmental impacts of paddy production.

Authors:  Ashkan Nabavi-Pelesaraei; Shahin Rafiee; Seyed Saeid Mohtasebi; Homa Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha; Kwok-Wing Chau
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Estimating the volatilization of ammonia from synthetic nitrogenous fertilizers used in China.

Authors:  Yisheng Zhang; Shengji Luan; Liaoliao Chen; Min Shao
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.789

9.  Environmental life cycle assessment of grain maize production: An analysis of factors causing variability.

Authors:  Lieselot Boone; Veerle Van Linden; Steven De Meester; Bart Vandecasteele; Hilde Muylle; Isabel Roldán-Ruiz; Thomas Nemecek; Jo Dewulf
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Life cycle energy efficiency and environmental impact assessment of bioethanol production from sweet potato based on different production modes.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Chunrong Jia; Yi Wu; Xunfeng Xia; Beidou Xi; Lijun Wang; Youlong Zhai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Subterranean Microbiome Affiliations of Plantain (Musa spp.) Under Diverse Agroecologies of Western and Central Africa.

Authors:  Manoj Kaushal; Yao Kolombia; Amos Emitati Alakonya; Apollin Fotso Kuate; Alejandro Ortega-Beltran; Delphine Amah; Cargele Masso
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.192

2.  The Deviation of the Behaviors of Rice Farmers from Their Stated Willingness to Apply Biopesticides-A Study Carried Out in Jilin Province of China.

Authors:  Hongpeng Guo; Fanhui Sun; Chulin Pan; Baiming Yang; Yin Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.