Literature DB >> 29727952

Integration of artificial intelligence methods and life cycle assessment to predict energy output and environmental impacts of paddy production.

Ashkan Nabavi-Pelesaraei1, Shahin Rafiee2, Seyed Saeid Mohtasebi3, Homa Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha3, Kwok-Wing Chau4.   

Abstract

Prediction of agricultural energy output and environmental impacts play important role in energy management and conservation of environment as it can help us to evaluate agricultural energy efficiency, conduct crops production system commissioning, and detect and diagnose faults of crop production system. Agricultural energy output and environmental impacts can be readily predicted by artificial intelligence (AI), owing to the ease of use and adaptability to seek optimal solutions in a rapid manner as well as the use of historical data to predict future agricultural energy use pattern under constraints. This paper conducts energy output and environmental impact prediction of paddy production in Guilan province, Iran based on two AI methods, artificial neural networks (ANNs), and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). The amounts of energy input and output are 51,585.61MJkg-1 and 66,112.94MJkg-1, respectively, in paddy production. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is used to evaluate environmental impacts of paddy production. Results show that, in paddy production, in-farm emission is a hotspot in global warming, acidification and eutrophication impact categories. ANN model with 12-6-8-1 structure is selected as the best one for predicting energy output. The correlation coefficient (R) varies from 0.524 to 0.999 in training for energy input and environmental impacts in ANN models. ANFIS model is developed based on a hybrid learning algorithm, with R for predicting output energy being 0.860 and, for environmental impacts, varying from 0.944 to 0.997. Results indicate that the multi-level ANFIS is a useful tool to managers for large-scale planning in forecasting energy output and environmental indices of agricultural production systems owing to its higher speed of computation processes compared to ANN model, despite ANN's higher accuracy.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Energy; Life cycle assessment; Modeling; Paddy

Year:  2018        PMID: 29727952     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Tools Towards the Sustainability and Circularity of Data Centers.

Authors:  Mohamed Sameer Hoosain; Babu Sena Paul; Susanna Kass; Seeram Ramakrishna
Journal:  Circ Econ Sustain       Date:  2022-07-01

2.  Comparative analysis on environmental and economic performance of agricultural cooperatives and smallholder farmers: The case of grape production in Hebei, China.

Authors:  Lei Deng; Lei Chen; Jingjie Zhao; Ruimei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Eco-energy and environmental evaluation of cantaloupe production by life cycle assessment method.

Authors:  Amir Azizpanah; Rostam Fathi; Morteza Taki
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 5.190

4.  Self-organizing maps of typhoon tracks allow for flood forecasts up to two days in advance.

Authors:  Li-Chiu Chang; Fi-John Chang; Shun-Nien Yang; Fong-He Tsai; Ting-Hua Chang; Edwin E Herricks
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Principal of environmental life cycle assessment for medical waste during COVID-19 outbreak to support sustainable development goals.

Authors:  Ashkan Nabavi-Pelesaraei; Naghmeh Mohammadkashi; Leila Naderloo; Mahsa Abbasi; Kwok-Wing Chau
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 10.753

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.