Literature DB >> 29145050

Can farmers mitigate environmental impacts through combined production of food, fuel and feed? A consequential life cycle assessment of integrated mixed crop-livestock system with a green biorefinery.

Ranjan Parajuli1, Tommy Dalgaard2, Morten Birkved3.   

Abstract

This study evaluates environmental impacts of an integrated mixed crop-livestock system with a green biorefinery (GBR). System integration included production of feed crops and green biomasses (Sys-I) to meet the demand of a livestock system (Sys-III) and to process green biomasses in a GBR system (Sys-II). Processing of grass-clover to produce feed protein was considered in Sys-II, particularly to substitute the imported soybean meal. Waste generated from the livestock and GBR systems were considered for the conversion to biomethane (Sys-IV). Digestate produced therefrom was assumed to be recirculated back to the farmers' field (Sys-I). A consequential approach of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method was used to evaluate the environmental impacts of a combined production of suckler cow calves (SCC) and Pigs, calculated in terms of their live weight (LW). The functional unit (FU) was a basket of two products "1kgLW-SCC+1kgLW-Pigs", produced at the farm gate. Results obtained per FU were: 19.6kg CO2 eq for carbon footprint; 0.11kg PO4 eq for eutrophication potential, -129MJ eq for non-renewable energy use and -3.9 comparative toxicity units (CTUe) for potential freshwater ecotoxicity. Environmental impact, e.g. greenhouse gas (GHG) emission was primarily due to (i) N2O emission and diesel consumption within Sys-I, (ii) energy input to Sys-II, III and IV, and (iii) methane emission from Sys-III and Sys-IV. Specifically, integrating GBR with the mixed crop-livestock system contributed 4% of the GHG emissions, whilst its products credited 7% of the total impact. Synergies among the different sub-systems showed positive environmental gains for the selected main products. The main effects of the system integration were in the reductions of GHG emissions, fossil fuel consumption, eutrophication potential and freshwater ecotoxicity, compared to a conventional mixed crop-livestock system, without the biogas conversion facility and the GBR.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beef; Biomethane; Environmental sustainability; Green biorefinery; Livestock; Pig

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29145050     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Comparative analysis on environmental and economic performance of agricultural cooperatives and smallholder farmers: The case of grape production in Hebei, China.

Authors:  Lei Deng; Lei Chen; Jingjie Zhao; Ruimei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Protocol for life cycle assessment modeling of US fruit and vegetable supply chains- cases of processed potato and tomato products.

Authors:  Ranjan Parajuli; Dave Gustafson; Senthold Asseng; Claudio O Stöckle; John Kruse; Chuang Zhao; Pon Intrapapong; Marty D Matlock; Greg Thoma
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2020-12-10

Review 3.  Microbiome Research as an Effective Driver of Success Stories in Agrifood Systems - A Selection of Case Studies.

Authors:  Rocío Olmo; Stefanie Urimare Wetzels; Jaderson Silveira Leite Armanhi; Paulo Arruda; Gabriele Berg; Tomislav Cernava; Paul D Cotter; Solon Cordeiro Araujo; Rafael Soares Correa de Souza; Ilario Ferrocino; Jens C Frisvad; Marina Georgalaki; Hanne Helene Hansen; Maria Kazou; George Seghal Kiran; Tanja Kostic; Susanne Krauss-Etschmann; Aicha Kriaa; Lene Lange; Emmanuelle Maguin; Birgit Mitter; Mette Olaf Nielsen; Marta Olivares; Narciso Martín Quijada; Marina Romaní-Pérez; Yolanda Sanz; Michael Schloter; Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin; Sarah Craven Seaton; Joseph Selvin; Angela Sessitsch; Mengcen Wang; Benjamin Zwirzitz; Evelyne Selberherr; Martin Wagner
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Availability of disaggregated greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle production: a systematic review.

Authors:  John Lynch
Journal:  Environ Impact Assess Rev       Date:  2019-02-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.