Literature DB >> 33491286

Predictive and prognostic significance of tumour subtype, SSTR1-5 and e-cadherin expression in a well-defined cohort of patients with acromegaly.

Jiri Soukup1, Helena Hornychova1, Monika Manethova1, Kvetoslava Michalova2,3, Ludmila Michnova4, Lenka Popovska5, Veronika Skarkova6, Tomas Cesak7, David Netuka8, Ales Ryska1, Jan Cap9, Václav Hána10, Václav Hána10, Michal Kršek10, Eva Dvořáková11, Michal Krčma11, Ivica Lazurova12, Věra Olšovská13, Karel Starý14, Peter Vaňuga15, Filip Gabalec9.   

Abstract

In somatotroph pituitary tumours, somatostatin analogue (SSA) therapy outcomes vary throughout the studies. We performed an analysis of cohort of patients with acromegaly from the Czech registry to identify new prognostic and predictive factors. Clinical data of patients were collected, and complex immunohistochemical assessment of tumour samples was performed (SSTR1-5, dopamine D2 receptor, E-cadherin, AIP). The study included 110 patients. In 31, SSA treatment outcome was evaluated. Sparsely granulated tumours (SGST) differed from the other subtypes in expression of SSTR2A, SSTR3, SSTR5 and E-cadherin and occurred more often in young. No other clinical differences were observed. Trouillas grading system showed association with age, tumour size and SSTR2A expression. Factors significantly associated with SSA treatment outcome included age, IGF1 levels, tumour size and expression of E-cadherin and SSTR2A. In the group of SGST, poor SSA response was observed in younger patients with larger tumours, lower levels of SSTR2A and higher Ki67. We observed no relationship with expression of other proteins including AIP. No predictive value of E-cadherin was observed when tumour subtype was considered. Multiple additional factors apart from SSTR2A expression can predict treatment outcome in patients with acromegaly.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PITNET; acromegaly; pituitary neoplasm; somatostatin receptor

Year:  2021        PMID: 33491286      PMCID: PMC7933931          DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.16173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Mol Med        ISSN: 1582-1838            Impact factor:   5.310


  37 in total

Review 1.  Somatostatin receptor ligands in the treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Monica R Gadelha; Luiz Eduardo Wildemberg; Marcello D Bronstein; Federico Gatto; Diego Ferone
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Adenoma granulation pattern correlates with clinical variables and effect of somatostatin analogue treatment in a large series of patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Stine Lyngvi Fougner; Olivera Casar-Borota; Ansgar Heck; Jens Petter Berg; Jens Bollerslev
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.478

3.  Expression analysis of dopamine receptor subtypes in normal human pituitaries, nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas and somatotropinomas, and the association between dopamine and somatostatin receptors with clinical response to octreotide-LAR in acromegaly.

Authors:  Leonardo Vieira Neto; Evelyn de O Machado; Raul M Luque; Giselle F Taboada; Jorge B Marcondes; Leila M C Chimelli; Leonardo Pereira Quintella; Paulo Niemeyer; Denise P de Carvalho; Rhonda D Kineman; Mônica R Gadelha
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Clinicopathological features of growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: difference among various types defined by cytokeratin distribution pattern including a transitional form.

Authors:  Abdulkader Obari; Toshiaki Sano; Kenichi Ohyama; Eiji Kudo; Zhi Rong Qian; Akiko Yoneda; Nasim Rayhan; Muhammad Mustafizur Rahman; Shozo Yamada
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.943

5.  Germline mutations of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene and somatostatin receptor 1-5 and AIP immunostaining in patients with sporadic acromegaly with poor versus good response to somatostatin analogues.

Authors:  Hande Mefkure Ozkaya; Nil Comunoglu; Muge Sayitoglu; Fatma Ela Keskin; Sinem Firtina; Khusan Khodzhaev; Tugce Apaydin; Nurperi Gazioglu; Necmettin Tanriover; Buge Oz; Pinar Kadioglu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  A new prognostic clinicopathological classification of pituitary adenomas: a multicentric case-control study of 410 patients with 8 years post-operative follow-up.

Authors:  Jacqueline Trouillas; Pascal Roy; Nathalie Sturm; Emmanuelle Dantony; Christine Cortet-Rudelli; Gabriel Viennet; Jean-François Bonneville; Richard Assaker; Carole Auger; Thierry Brue; Aurélie Cornelius; Henry Dufour; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Patrick François; Françoise Galland; François Mougel; François Chapuis; Laurent Villeneuve; Claude-Alain Maurage; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Gérald Raverot; A Barlier; M Bernier; F Bonnet; F Borson-Chazot; G Brassier; S Caulet-Maugendre; O Chabre; P Chanson; J F Cottier; B Delemer; E Delgrange; L Di Tommaso; S Eimer; S Gaillard; M Jan; J J Girard; V Lapras; H Loiseau; J G Passagia; M Patey; A Penfornis; J Y Poirier; G Perrin; A Tabarin
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 17.088

7.  Molecular and functional properties of densely and sparsely granulated GH-producing pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Bernhard Mayr; Rolf Buslei; Marily Theodoropoulou; Günter K Stalla; Michael Buchfelder; Christof Schöfl
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 8.  The effects of somatostatin analogue therapy on pituitary tumor volume in patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Annamaria Colao; Renata S Auriemma; Rosario Pivonello
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Association between dopamine and somatostatin receptor expression and pharmacological response to somatostatin analogues in acromegaly.

Authors:  Eva Venegas-Moreno; Mari C Vazquez-Borrego; Elena Dios; Noelia Gros-Herguido; Alvaro Flores-Martinez; Esther Rivero-Cortés; Ainara Madrazo-Atutxa; Miguel A Japón; Raúl M Luque; Justo P Castaño; David A Cano; Alfonso Soto-Moreno
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  Predictive and prognostic significance of tumour subtype, SSTR1-5 and e-cadherin expression in a well-defined cohort of patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Jiri Soukup; Helena Hornychova; Monika Manethova; Kvetoslava Michalova; Ludmila Michnova; Lenka Popovska; Veronika Skarkova; Tomas Cesak; David Netuka; Ales Ryska; Jan Cap; Václav Hána; Václav Hána; Michal Kršek; Eva Dvořáková; Michal Krčma; Ivica Lazurova; Věra Olšovská; Karel Starý; Peter Vaňuga; Filip Gabalec
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 5.310

View more
  3 in total

1.  Predictive and prognostic significance of tumour subtype, SSTR1-5 and e-cadherin expression in a well-defined cohort of patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Jiri Soukup; Helena Hornychova; Monika Manethova; Kvetoslava Michalova; Ludmila Michnova; Lenka Popovska; Veronika Skarkova; Tomas Cesak; David Netuka; Ales Ryska; Jan Cap; Václav Hána; Václav Hána; Michal Kršek; Eva Dvořáková; Michal Krčma; Ivica Lazurova; Věra Olšovská; Karel Starý; Peter Vaňuga; Filip Gabalec
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 2.  The Future of Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly.

Authors:  Monica R Gadelha; Luiz Eduardo Wildemberg; Leandro Kasuki
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Association of Pathology Markers with Somatostatin Analogue Responsiveness in Acromegaly.

Authors:  George Kontogeorgos; Vyron Markussis; Eleni Thodou; Efi Kyrodimou; Theodossia Choreftaki; Panagiotis Nomikos; Kostas I Lampropoulos; Stylianos Tsagarakis
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 2.803

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.