Literature DB >> 23400299

A new prognostic clinicopathological classification of pituitary adenomas: a multicentric case-control study of 410 patients with 8 years post-operative follow-up.

Jacqueline Trouillas1, Pascal Roy, Nathalie Sturm, Emmanuelle Dantony, Christine Cortet-Rudelli, Gabriel Viennet, Jean-François Bonneville, Richard Assaker, Carole Auger, Thierry Brue, Aurélie Cornelius, Henry Dufour, Emmanuel Jouanneau, Patrick François, Françoise Galland, François Mougel, François Chapuis, Laurent Villeneuve, Claude-Alain Maurage, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Gérald Raverot, A Barlier, M Bernier, F Bonnet, F Borson-Chazot, G Brassier, S Caulet-Maugendre, O Chabre, P Chanson, J F Cottier, B Delemer, E Delgrange, L Di Tommaso, S Eimer, S Gaillard, M Jan, J J Girard, V Lapras, H Loiseau, J G Passagia, M Patey, A Penfornis, J Y Poirier, G Perrin, A Tabarin.   

Abstract

Pituitary adenomas are currently classified by histological, immunocytochemical and numerous ultrastructural characteristics lacking unequivocal prognostic correlations. We investigated the prognostic value of a new clinicopathological classification with grades based on invasion and proliferation. This retrospective multicentric case-control study comprised 410 patients who had surgery for a pituitary tumour with long-term follow-up. Using pituitary magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of cavernous or sphenoid sinus invasion, immunocytochemistry, markers of the cell cycle (Ki-67, mitoses) and p53, tumours were classified according to size (micro, macro and giant), type (PRL, GH, FSH/LH, ACTH and TSH) and grade (grade 1a: non-invasive, 1b: non-invasive and proliferative, 2a: invasive, 2b: invasive and proliferative, and 3: metastatic). The association between patient status at 8-year follow-up and age, sex, and classification was evaluated by two multivariate analyses assessing disease- or recurrence/progression-free status. At 8 years after surgery, 195 patients were disease-free (controls) and 215 patients were not (cases). In 125 of the cases the tumours had recurred or progressed. Analyses of disease-free and recurrence/progression-free status revealed the significant prognostic value (p < 0.001; p < 0.05) of age, tumour type, and grade across all tumour types and for each tumour type. Invasive and proliferative tumours (grade 2b) had a poor prognosis with an increased probability of tumour persistence or progression of 25- or 12-fold, respectively, as compared to non-invasive tumours (grade 1a). This new, easy to use clinicopathological classification of pituitary endocrine tumours has demonstrated its prognostic worth by strongly predicting the probability of post-operative complete remission or tumour progression and so could help clinicians choose the best post-operative therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23400299     DOI: 10.1007/s00401-013-1084-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neuropathol        ISSN: 0001-6322            Impact factor:   17.088


  124 in total

Review 1.  Advances and controversies in the classification and grading of pituitary tumors.

Authors:  E R Laws; D L Penn; C S Repetti
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Role of a p53 polymorphism in the development of nonfunctional pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Garima Yagnik; Arman Jahangiri; Rebecca Chen; Jeffrey R Wagner; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.102

3.  Radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide for the management of extraneural metastases in pituitary carcinoma.

Authors:  Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka; David Cachia; Steven G Waguespack; Christopher H Crane; Anita Mahajan; Paul D Brown; Joo Yeon Nam; Ian E McCutcheon; Marta Penas-Prado
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 4.  [New aspects of tumor pathology of the pituitary].

Authors:  W Saeger
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 5.  Current status on histological classification in Cushing's disease.

Authors:  Luis V Syro; Fabio Rotondo; Michael D Cusimano; Antonio Di Ieva; Eva Horvath; Lina M Restrepo; Min Wong; Donald W Killinger; Harley Smyth; Kalman Kovacs
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Neurological abnormalities in 97 dogs with detectable pituitary masses.

Authors:  Marika Menchetti; Luisa De Risio; Greta Galli; Giunio Bruto Cherubini; Daniele Corlazzoli; Massimo Baroni; Gualtiero Gandini
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.320

Review 7.  Pathology of GH-producing pituitary adenomas and GH cell hyperplasia of the pituitary.

Authors:  Luis V Syro; Fabio Rotondo; Carlos A Serna; Leon D Ortiz; Kalman Kovacs
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Role of prolactin/adenoma maximum diameter and prolactin/adenoma volume in the differential diagnosis of prolactinomas and other types of pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Yinxing Huang; Chenyu Ding; Fangfang Zhang; Deyong Xiao; Lin Zhao; Shousen Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Prediction of high proliferative index in pituitary macroadenomas using MRI-based radiomics and machine learning.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ugga; Renato Cuocolo; Domenico Solari; Elia Guadagno; Alessandra D'Amico; Teresa Somma; Paolo Cappabianca; Maria Laura Del Basso de Caro; Luigi Maria Cavallo; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 10.  Giant pituitary adenoma: histological types, clinical features and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Pedro Iglesias; Víctor Rodríguez Berrocal; Juan José Díez
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.