Ganesan Priya1, Balaraman Madhan2, Uttamchand Narendrakumar3, Rayadurgam Venkata Suresh Kumar4, Inderchand Manjubala1. 1. Department of Biosciences, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India. 2. Centre for Academic and Research Excellence (CARE), CSIR-CLRI, Chennai 600020, India. 3. Department of Manufacturing Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India. 4. Department of Surgery and Radiology, Sri Venkateshwara Veterinary University, Tirupati 517502, India.
Abstract
The present study involves the development of citric acid-cross-linked carboxymethyl cellulose (C3CA) scaffolds by a freeze-drying process. Scaffolds were fabricated at different freezing temperatures of -20, -40, or -80 °C to investigate the influence of scaffold pore size on bone regeneration. All three scaffolds were porous in structure, and the pore size was measured to be 74 ± 4, 55 ± 6, and 46 ± 5 μm for -20, -40, and -80 °C scaffolds. The pores were larger in scaffolds processed at -20 °C compared to -40 and -80 °C, indicating the reduction in pore size of the scaffolds with a decrease in freezing temperature. The cytocompatibility, cell proliferation, and differentiation in C3CA scaffolds were assessed with the Saos-2 osteoblast cell line. These scaffolds supported the proliferation and differentiation of Saos-2 cells with significant matrix mineralization in scaffolds processed at -40 °C. Subcutaneous implantation of C3CA scaffolds in the rat model was investigated for its ability of vascularization and new matrix tissue formation. The matrix formation was observed at the earliest of 14 days in the scaffolds when processed at -40 °C while it was observed only after 28 days of implantation with the scaffolds processed at -20 and -80 °C. These results suggest that the citric acid-cross-linked CMC scaffolds processed at -40 °C can be promising for bone tissue engineering application.
The present study involves the development of citric acid-cross-linked carboxymethyl cellulose (C3CA) scaffolds by a freeze-drying process. Scaffolds were fabricated at different freezing temperatures of -20, -40, or -80 °C to investigate the influence of scaffold pore size on bone regeneration. All three scaffolds were porous in structure, and the pore size was measured to be 74 ± 4, 55 ± 6, and 46 ± 5 μm for -20, -40, and -80 °C scaffolds. The pores were larger in scaffolds processed at -20 °C compared to -40 and -80 °C, indicating the reduction in pore size of the scaffolds with a decrease in freezing temperature. The cytocompatibility, cell proliferation, and differentiation in C3CA scaffolds were assessed with the Saos-2 osteoblast cell line. These scaffolds supported the proliferation and differentiation of Saos-2 cells with significant matrix mineralization in scaffolds processed at -40 °C. Subcutaneous implantation of C3CA scaffolds in the rat model was investigated for its ability of vascularization and new matrix tissue formation. The matrix formation was observed at the earliest of 14 days in the scaffolds when processed at -40 °C while it was observed only after 28 days of implantation with the scaffolds processed at -20 and -80 °C. These results suggest that the citric acid-cross-linked CMC scaffolds processed at -40 °C can be promising for bone tissue engineering application.
Bone has a self-healing capacity, but
it is difficult to heal in
critical size defects, which requires clinical intervention for its
reunion and regeneration.[1] Three-dimensional
(3D) scaffolds offer a promising platform for tissue regeneration
that serves as a temporary support at the defective site and directs
the cellular growth.[1,2] Polysaccharide and protein-based
natural polymers such as chitosan, gelatin, alginate, collagen, cellulose,
and their derivatives have been explored in various tissue engineering
applications.[3−7] Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) is an anionic, water-soluble, biocompatible,
and biodegradable polymer with excellent properties of high hydrophilicity,
viscosity, defoaming, chelating, and antifouling abilities.[3,8−11] CMC hydrogels are well known for their swelling ability and sensitivity
to pH and ionic strength variations; hence, it behaves as a smart
polyelectrolyte.[12] The use of CMC has been
widely established in pharmaceutical, drug and protein delivery, and
wound healing applications.[13−15]Being anionic, CMC has
the ability to interact with chitosan and
can form polyelectrolyte complexes for tissue engineering applications.
CMC–chitosan membranes coated with nanohydroxyapatite have
shown improved morphology, stability, and bioactivity compared to
pure chitosan membranes.[16] CMC is also
incorporated in various polymer-based and ceramic-based composites
and formulated as hydrogels, scaffolds, injectable gels, and membranes
for bone tissue engineering applications.[17−20] CMC hydrogels containing hydroxyapatite
(HA) and β-tricalcium phosphate are reported to stimulate the
mesenchymal stem cell differentiation toward osteogenic and odontogenic
lineages.[21−23] CMC–hydroxyapatite nanocomposites are shown
to have enhanced mechanical strength and have been proposed for load-bearing
applications.[24] These reports suggested
that CMC can be a suitable matrix for HA-based composites in bone
tissue engineering due to the inherent capacities of CMC to undergo
gelation by hydrogen bond and to induce Ca2+ chelation
by its carboxylic groups.[20,24−27]Though CMC has been used as promising scaffolds, a detailed
investigation
of their biological properties in terms of cytocompatibility, osteogenic
differentiation, and mineralization is required to further establish
their potential for bone tissue engineering applications. Citric acid
(CA) has been used as a nontoxic cross-linker in the preparation of
CMC-based hydrogels to enhance their biostability and superabsorbent
behavior.[10,15,21] The present
study involves the development of citric acid-cross-linked CMC scaffolds via freeze-drying process at three different freezing temperatures
of −20, −40, or −80 °C. The freeze-drying
process helps to fabricate highly porous scaffolds by permitting pore
formation from the sublimation of ice crystals, and its key advantage
is the possibility of fabricating scaffolds with varying pore properties.[28] The objective of this study is to evaluate the
ability of the citric acid-cross-linked scaffolds to promote cell
growth, differentiation, and mineralization in the presence of osteogenic
induction. The new tissue formation by the CMC scaffolds in the subcutaneous
implantation of the rat model was further investigated to determine
their osteoinductive potential.
Results
Scaffold Morphology
and Porosity
The photographs and
the cross-sectional morphology of C3CA scaffolds processed at −20,
−40, and −80 °C are shown in Figure , and their pore properties are listed in Table . All three scaffolds
showed porous structures with interconnected pores (Figure d–f). The pore size
of the scaffolds was measured to be 74 ± 4, 55 ± 6, and
46 ± 5 μm at −20, −40, and −80 °C,
respectively. The decrease in freezing temperature from −20
to −80 °C has resulted in the reduction of pore size of
the scaffolds. The surface area and pore volume of C3CA20 are 9.66
m2/g and 0.016 cc/g, respectively, while C3CA40 showed
the corresponding values of 3.79 m2/g and 0.008 cc/g. The
surface area and pore volume of C3CA80 were not determined due to
the presence of smaller pores that made it difficult to calculate
their pore properties. The scaffolds had porosities of 67 ± 7,
66 ± 5, and 68 ± 5% at −20, −40, and −80
°C, indicating that the change in freezing temperature has not
affected the porosity of the scaffolds.
Figure 1
(a–c) Photographs
and (d–f) cross-sectional morphologies
of C3CA scaffolds processed at −20, −40, and −80
°C. All three scaffolds showed porous structures, and the pores
were bigger in C3CA20 compared to those in C3CA40 and C3CA80. Scale
bar: 100 μm.
Table 1
Pore Properties
of C3CA Scaffolds
Processed at −20, −40, and −80 °Ca
scaffolds
pore size
(μm) (mean ± SD)
total pore
volume of pores >2 μm (cc/g)
surface area (m2/g)
porosity
(%)
C3CA20
74 ± 4
0.016
9.66
67 ± 7
C3CA40
55 ± 6
0.008
3.79
66 ± 5
C3CA80
46 ± 5
ND
ND
68 ± 5
ND: not determined.
(a–c) Photographs
and (d–f) cross-sectional morphologies
of C3CA scaffolds processed at −20, −40, and −80
°C. All three scaffolds showed porous structures, and the pores
were bigger in C3CA20 compared to those in C3CA40 and C3CA80. Scale
bar: 100 μm.ND: not determined.
Swelling Property
The absorption of phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) was found to be spontaneous in all of the scaffolds,
and the swelling ratios of C3CA20, C3CA40, and C3CA80 were found to
be 644 ± 41, 640 ± 20, and 548 ± 42%, respectively.
It can be inferred that the swelling ratio is lower in C3CA80 than
in C3CA20 and C3CA40 scaffolds. It is due to the presence of smaller
pores in C3CA80 that rendered less uptake of PBS into the pores of
the scaffolds.
Cell Proliferation and Differentiation
The proliferation
of Saos-2 cells in C3CA scaffolds after 4, 7, and 14 days of culture
is shown in Figure a. The obtained absorbance value indicates the metabolic activity
of proliferating cells. The increase in absorbance from day 4 to 14
indicates the consistent proliferation of cells with time. On day
14, the cell proliferation in C3CA20 is significantly higher than
in C3CA40 and C3CA80 scaffolds. The alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression
by the Saos-2 cells after 4 days of culture in C3CA scaffolds is shown
in Figure b. All three
scaffolds showed a considerable amount of ALP activity (1.4–1.8
unit/mg of protein) with no significant difference among the C3CA
scaffolds.
Figure 2
(a) Proliferation of Saos-2 cells after 4, 7, and 14 days of culture
in C3CA scaffolds (processed at −20, −40, and −80
°C), measured by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium
(MTT) assay (no significant difference among samples on day 4; **p < 0.01 for comparison between C3CA40 vs C3CA20 and C3CA80 on day 7; ****p < 0.0001 for
comparison between C3CA20 vs C3CA40, and C3CA80 on
day 14). (b) ALP activity of the cells after 4 days of culture in
C3CA scaffolds (ns represents no significant difference among samples).
(a) Proliferation of Saos-2 cells after 4, 7, and 14 days of culture
in C3CA scaffolds (processed at −20, −40, and −80
°C), measured by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium
(MTT) assay (no significant difference among samples on day 4; **p < 0.01 for comparison between C3CA40 vs C3CA20 and C3CA80 on day 7; ****p < 0.0001 for
comparison between C3CA20 vs C3CA40, and C3CA80 on
day 14). (b) ALP activity of the cells after 4 days of culture in
C3CA scaffolds (ns represents no significant difference among samples).
Mineralization and Gene Expression
The mineralization
of the cell matrix by Saos-2 cells after 21 days of culture in C3CA
scaffolds is shown in Figure a. The cells in C3CA40 showed a significant amount of matrix
mineralization compared to the C3CA20 and C3CA80 scaffolds analyzed
by quantitative Alizarin Red S (ARS) assay. The mRNA expression of
osteoblast-specific genes by the cells after 4 days of culture in
C3CA scaffolds is shown in Figure b. Interestingly, C3CA40 showed significantly higher
expressions of runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX 2), collagen
type-1 (COL 1A), and ALP genes compared to C3CA20 and C3CA80 scaffolds.
These results suggest that C3CA40 can preferentially promote the differentiation
and mineralization of Saos-2 cells than C3CA20 and C3CA80 scaffolds.
Figure 3
(a) Quantification
of matrix mineralization after 21 days of cell
culture in C3CA scaffolds (****p < 0.0001 for
comparison between C3CA40 vs C3CA20 and C3CA80).
(b) Relative gene expressions of RUNX 2, ALP, and COL 1A after 4 days
of culture in C3CA scaffolds (p < 0.001 and ϕp < 0.01 for
comparison between C3CA40 and C3CA80). C3CA40 can preferentially promote
cell differentiation and mineralization than C3CA20 and C3CA80 as
indicated by its significant mineralization and gene upregulation.
(a) Quantification
of matrix mineralization after 21 days of cell
culture in C3CA scaffolds (****p < 0.0001 for
comparison between C3CA40 vs C3CA20 and C3CA80).
(b) Relative gene expressions of RUNX 2, ALP, and COL 1A after 4 days
of culture in C3CA scaffolds (p < 0.001 and ϕp < 0.01 for
comparison between C3CA40 and C3CA80). C3CA40 can preferentially promote
cell differentiation and mineralization than C3CA20 and C3CA80 as
indicated by its significant mineralization and gene upregulation.
Subcutaneous Implantation Analysis
The hematoxylin
and eosin (H&E)-stained images of the subcutaneously implanted
C3CA scaffolds (processed at −20, −40, and −80
°C) after predetermined time intervals are shown in Figure . At 3 days post-implantation,
all of the C3CA implants showed acute to moderate inflammatory response,
which is accompanied by the infiltration of neutrophils and red blood
cells (RBCs). The immune response in the implants was reduced after
7 days of implantation. At 14 days post-implantation, C3CA40 showed
the presence of blood capillaries (indicated by red arrows, Figure ) and pink-colored
matrix tissues (indicated by red asterisks, Figure ), which indicate the vascularization and
new tissue formation in the implant. In the case of C3CA80, only the
blood capillaries were observed on day 14 while C3CA20 showed the
presence of blood capillaries only after 21 days of implantation.
All of the implants showed the infiltration of fibroblast cells by
21 days post-implantation (indicated by yellow arrows, Figure ). These fibroblast cells will
further help in the synthesis of extracellular matrices in the implant.
C3CA20 and C3CA80 showed the new tissue formation only after 28 days
of implantation, which is quite delayed compared to C3CA40 scaffolds.
The reduction of the scaffold material and the replacement of fibrous
tissues can also be observed after 28 days of implantation. The penetration
of large blood capillaries from the peripheral tissues (Pt) was observed
in the implants at 35 days post-implantation (indicated by red arrows, Figure ).
Figure 4
H&E staining of the
C3CA implant sections after defined time
intervals. Cellular infiltration into the implants is indicated by
black arrows on days 3 and 7. C3CA40 showed blood vessel and new matrix
formation on day 14, while C3CA20 and C3CA80 showed matrix formation
only after 28 days of implantation. Pt, peripheral tissue; S, scaffold;
red asterisk, new matrix formation; red arrows, blood vessels; yellow
arrows, fibrous tissue in-growths.
H&E staining of the
C3CA implant sections after defined time
intervals. Cellular infiltration into the implants is indicated by
black arrows on days 3 and 7. C3CA40 showed blood vessel and new matrix
formation on day 14, while C3CA20 and C3CA80 showed matrix formation
only after 28 days of implantation. Pt, peripheral tissue; S, scaffold;
red asterisk, new matrix formation; red arrows, blood vessels; yellow
arrows, fibrous tissue in-growths.The Masson’s trichrome-stained images of C3CA implant sections
after 28 and 35 days of implantation are shown in Figure . The collagen deposition in
the implants can be identified as green-colored fibrous matrices.
All three implants showed the positive staining of collagen deposition
after 28 days of implantation (indicated by yellow arrows, Figure ). On day 35, the
cross sections of many blood vessels were observed in all three implant
sections in addition to collagen staining (as indicated by red arrows, Figure ). This indicated
the matrix tissue formation and rich blood supply in the implants.
Figure 5
Masson’s
trichrome staining of C3CA implant sections after
28 and 35 days of implantation. Red arrows, blood vessels; yellow
arrows, collagen deposition. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Masson’s
trichrome staining of C3CA implant sections after
28 and 35 days of implantation. Red arrows, blood vessels; yellow
arrows, collagen deposition. Scale bar: 100 μm.The immunohistochemical staining of CD31 and osteocalcin
markers
in the C3CA implant sections at 35 days post-implantation is shown
in Figure . All three
implants showed positive staining of CD31 marker, indicating the presence
of endothelial cells (indicated by red arrows). This further confirms
the vascularization in the implants. All three implants showed mild
staining for the presence of osteocalcin-positive cells, indicating
that the cells are yet to differentiate into the osteoblastic lineage.
Figure 6
Immunohistochemical
staining of C3CA implant sections with anti-CD31
and anti-osteocalcin after 35 days of implantation. Positive staining
of CD31 confirmed the vascularization in the implants. The presence
of mild staining of osteocalcin-positive cells indicates the unconfined
cells to osteoblastic lineage. The red arrows indicate blood vessels.
Scale bar: 100 μm.
Immunohistochemical
staining of C3CA implant sections with anti-CD31
and anti-osteocalcin after 35 days of implantation. Positive staining
of CD31 confirmed the vascularization in the implants. The presence
of mild staining of osteocalcin-positive cells indicates the unconfined
cells to osteoblastic lineage. The red arrows indicate blood vessels.
Scale bar: 100 μm.The scanning electron
microscopic images of the implants after
35 days of implantation are shown in Figure . All three implants showed significant fibrous
tissue in-growths into their pore spaces as there was no apparent
difference between the implant and the peripheral tissues. The large
region without any tissue formation in the center of C3CA20 is due
to the presence of a pore in the scaffold that was formed during the
fabrication process. Because of the larger pore size, penetration
of tissues was not observed or it may take longer time than 35 days
of implantation for tissue penetration into such bigger pores of the
scaffolds.
Figure 7
Scanning electron microscopic images of C3CA implants after 35
days of implantation. Fibrous tissue in-growths into the pore spaces
of implants as indicated with no apparent difference between peripheral
tissues (Pt) and implant material (S). Scale bar: 500 μm.
Scanning electron microscopic images of C3CA implants after 35
days of implantation. Fibrous tissue in-growths into the pore spaces
of implants as indicated with no apparent difference between peripheral
tissues (Pt) and implant material (S). Scale bar: 500 μm.
Discussion
In tissue engineering,
effective bone regeneration can be achieved
by involving the use of osteogenic, osteoconductive, and osteoinductive
scaffolds. CMC has been used for bone tissue engineering in recent
years, in various forms like injectable gels, hydrogels, composites,
films, and scaffolds.[17−20] However, the abilities of in vitro osteogenic differentiation
and in vivo tissue formation of CMC were not widely
explored. In this study, CMC scaffolds cross-linked with citric acid
and processed at freezing temperatures of −20, −40,
and −80 °C were evaluated for their osteogenic and new
tissue formation abilities. Unlike other cross-linkers of CMC such
as epichlorohydrin, glutaraldehyde, and genipin, citric acid is a
natural polycarboxylic acid that is biocompatible, biodegradable,
and an important metabolite in the body; hence, it is safe to be used
in medical applications.[8,29−33]Scaffolds used in tissue engineering should possess interconnected
porous structure and high porosity to provide scope for cell adhesion,
proliferation, and migration of invading cells into scaffolds.[34] As observed from the microscopic images, C3CA
scaffolds were porous in structure with interconnected pores. The
pore formation in the freeze-dried scaffolds can be tailored by controlling
the freezing rate during the fabrication process.[28] Increasing the cooling rate of the samples during the freezing
process leads to a rapid formation of ice crystals, which are the
negative replicas of the pores.[28,35] In the present study,
decreasing the freezing temperature from −20 to −80
°C during the fabrication process reduced the pore size in C3CA
scaffolds. However, changing the freezing temperature did not affect
the porosity of the scaffolds. The obtained results are in agreement
with the earlier results published by Guex et al. and Haugh et al.
who reported reduced pore size at increasing freezing rate.[28,36] Swelling ability is crucial for the scaffolds to facilitate cell
infiltration in a three-dimensional manner, during in vitro and in vivo tissue formation.[37] Further, it helps us to promote the supply of nutrients
and oxygen to the cells that are present in the inner regions of the
scaffolds. All three C3CA scaffolds showed good swelling ability and
were stable in PBS for more than 24 h; thus, these scaffolds are favorable
for tissue engineering applications.The cytocompatibility of
C3CA scaffolds processed at different
freezing temperatures was studied with the 3D culture of Saos-2 cells.
Cell lines such as MC3T3-E1, UMR-106, and Saos-2 are osteogenic precursors
that can differentiate and mineralize the bone matrix similar to native
osteoblasts. Hence, these cell lines are commonly used in the osteogenic
differentiation studies of scaffolds for bone regeneration applications.[38−40] Saos-2 cells are human-derived osteoblast cells, and therefore,
it is more advantageous to use those cells in the in vitro evaluation of scaffolds. All three C3CA scaffolds facilitated the
proliferation of Saos-2 cells as observed by increased metabolic activity
on day 14. This suggests that the C3CA scaffolds can be a favorable
substrate for cell adhesion and proliferation, thus indicating their
cytocompatibility.The differentiation phase of osteogenic cells
can be identified
in a variety of ways, such as alkaline phosphatase activity, matrix
mineralization, and mRNA expression of osteogenic genes.[36] ALP activity of the cells increases the local
concentration of free phosphates and initiates the active transport
of calcium and phosphate across their cell membrane.[21] The osteoblast cells attain maximum ALP activity during
the matrix maturation phase, and their expression is downregulated
once the mineralization begins.[41,42] The ALP activity and
the gene expression results in the present study suggest that the
Saos-2 cells are in the early phase of osteogenic differentiation.
RUNX 2 is a marker for early osteogenic differentiation, and it further
induces the expression of ALP and Col 1A for matrix synthesis and
mineralization.[43] The significant upregulation
of all three genes with prominent mineralization of cell matrices
in C3CA40 indicates that the Saos-2 cells are preferentially mineralizing
its matrix in C3CA40 compared to C3CA20 and C3CA80 scaffolds. Though
the bigger pores of C3CA20 provided space for a large number of cells
to infiltrate and proliferate, it did not contribute to the mineralization
of cell matrices as expected. On the other hand, the pore size of
C3CA40 facilitated the initial proliferation as well as mineralization
process in prolonged culture time. The pores of C3CA80 are too small
for the cells to effectively undergo proliferation and mineralization.
Thus, it can be inferred that the pore morphology of −40 °C-processed
scaffolds was favorable for the cells to undergo early osteogenesis.The in vivo osteoinductive potential of C3CA scaffolds
can be evaluated by their bone-forming ability in an ectopic site
where the osteogenic cues are limited. Cell infiltration, vascularization,
fibrous tissue in-growth, and matrix tissue formation followed by
their mineralization are the sequential parameters that must reach
a dynamic balance for successful bone induction.[44] Besides, these parameters help us to evaluate the biocompatibility,
immune response, and in vivo stability of the scaffolds
when implanted subcutaneously in the animals.[45,46] In the present study, the scaffolds were implanted subcutaneously
in the rats and their immune response, cellular infiltration, and
matrix deposition were evaluated. The neutrophils that are seen in
the initial days of implantation of scaffolds are mainly due to the
immune responses for foreign material and surgical procedures.Vascularization in the implants is another important factor for
tissue formation.[44] The presence of blood
vessels in the implants was observed in the H&E and Masson’s
trichrome-stained implant sections. This was further confirmed with
the positive staining of CD31, a highly sensitive and specific protein
marker of endothelial cells.[47] These results
confirm the vascularization in the implants, and this can continuously
supply nutrients and oxygen to the cells found interior in the implants.
The active fibroblasts in the implants at 21 days post-implantation
contribute to the synthesis of collagen and other extracellular matrix
proteins. The collagen deposition by the cells further promotes the
formation of the unmineralized organic matrix osteoid that contains
growth factors, cytokines, and other proteins for bone formation.
The new matrix formation was observed as early as 14 days in C3CA40
(55 ± 6 μm), accompanied by organized collagen networks
by 35 days of implantation. The smaller pores in C3CA80 (46 ±
5 μm) supported early vascularization similar to C3CA40 but
could not form the matrix tissue due to limited pore space. The blood
vessel and matrix formation in C3CA20 (74 ± 4 μm) is quite
delayed due to its larger pores, indicating that it requires a longer
time for osteoinduction.The pore size of the C3CA scaffolds
in the present study was lower
than the pore size (minimum 100 μm) suggested for optimal bone
in-growth, osteoconduction, and osteoinduction.[28,48] However, all three C3CA scaffolds facilitated vascularization, collagen
deposition, and new matrix formation at the earliest of implantation
compared to decellularized-cellulose (8 weeks), bacterial cellulose
(4 weeks) scaffolds, and tricalcium phosphate–calcium silicate
composites (8 weeks) reported for bone regeneration.[46,49,50] The most striking difference
is the early vascularization and new matrix formation in C3CA40 compared
to C3CA20 and C3CA80 scaffolds. Apart from this, the vascularization
and matrix tissue formation are exclusively achieved from the intrinsic
osteoinductive effect of CMC. It is also expected that the addition
of osteoinductive stimuli like calcium phosphates, bone morphogenetic
proteins, stem cells, osteoblasts, cytokines, growth factors, etc. would enhance the matrix tissue formation, and thereby,
it can contribute to new bone formation.[46]
Conclusions
In this study, citric acid-cross-linked CMC
scaffolds processed
at three freezing temperatures of −20, −40, and −80
°C were fabricated by the freeze-drying method. The scaffolds
facilitated the proliferation of Saos-2 cells, as well as permitted
the differentiation and mineralization of cell matrices in
vitro. Subcutaneous implantation of citric acid-cross-linked
CMC scaffolds in a rat model showed vascularization and new matrix
formation in the implants. The C3CA scaffolds processed at −40
°C with a pore size of 55 ± 6 μm can indeed enhance
the differentiation and mineralization of Saos-2 cells in
vitro and new matrix formation in vivo.
These results clearly demonstrated the osteogenic and osteoinductive
potential of CMC scaffolds cross-linked with citric acid.
Materials and
Methods
Materials
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (viscosity,
1500–3000 cP) and citric acid were obtained from HiMedia, India,
and used without further processing. Cell culture media (α-modified
Eagle’s medium, α-MEM), fetal calf serum (FCS), penicillin,
and streptomycin were purchased from Gibco. Other chemicals used in
the experiments were all of the analytical grades.
Fabrication
of Scaffolds
CMC solution (2.5 wt %) was
prepared in double-distilled water under continuous stirring to obtain
a homogeneous viscous solution and mixed with citric acid (CA, 2.0
wt % dissolved in 100 μL of distilled water) for about 5–10
min to get a cross-linked CMC solution (named as C3CA). All of the
solutions were cast in polystyrene molds of size 6.5 mm diameter ×
10.5 mm height and processed at freezing temperatures of −20,
−40, and −80 °C for 36 h (named as C3CA20, C3CA40,
and C3CA80). It is followed by freeze-drying in a lyophilizer (LYO0555,
Delvac, India) at a temperature of −40 °C (∼0.09
mmHg) for 48 h.
Morphological Analysis and Porosity Measurement
Cylindrical
C3CA scaffolds (6 mm diameter × 10 mm height) were cut into halves
(i.e., 5 mm from the bottom), and the morphology
at the cross section was examined using a scanning electron microscope
(Carl Zeiss, EVO 18 SEM), operated at an accelerating voltage of 10
kV and a working distance of 10 mm. The surface was sputter-coated
with gold palladium (Quorum sputter-coater). The pore size of the
scaffolds was measured using ImageJ software (1.49v, NIH Image) in
the manual mode. At least 20 pores were assessed at one SEM image
(magnification, 400×) for each scaffold composition. The randomly
selected pores were analyzed for the long pore axis, and an average
of 20 pores were determined. The pore volume and surface area of the
scaffolds were calculated by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) method in a pore size analyzer (QUADRASORB SI, Quantachrome
Instruments, Germany).The porosity of the scaffolds was measured
by an ethanol displacement method, as reported by Kim et al.[34] The initial weight (Wi) of the scaffolds was measured, and the scaffolds were immersed
in ethanol for 1 h at 37 °C to fill the pores with ethanol diffusion.
Then, the scaffolds were removed and the weight (Wf) was measured. The percentage porosity of the scaffolds
is calculated using eq , where ρ is the density of ethanol and Vs is the full volume of the scaffold.The swelling ratio of the scaffolds
was measured by immersing in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4)
at 37 °C. The initial dry weight (Wi) of the scaffolds (6 mm diameter × 3 mm height) was measured.
After 24 h of immersion in PBS, the weight of the wet scaffolds was
noted (Wf). The swelling ratio of the
scaffolds was calculated using eq .
Cell Culture and Seeding
Saos-2 cells were obtained
from National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India, and cultured in
α-MEM containing 10% FCS and 2% penicillin–streptomycin.
The cells were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37 °C
and 5% carbon dioxide. C3CA scaffolds (6 mm diameter × 1 mm height)
were seeded with 10 μL of the cell suspension at 5 × 106/mL concentration and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h to allow
cell adhesion. After 24 h, the medium was changed to an osteogenic
medium that contained osteogenic factors like β-glycerophosphate
(10 mM), l-ascorbic acid-2-phosphate (50 μg/mL), and
dexamethasone (100 nM) in α-MEM. The cell-seeded scaffolds were
maintained under the standard culture conditions by changing the osteogenic
media twice per week. For the assessment of cell proliferation, the
cells were maintained in the basal medium, whereas the cells cultured
in the osteogenic medium were used in the assessment of differentiation,
mineralization, and gene expression studies.
Cell Proliferation and
Differentiation
The proliferation
of Saos-2 cells on C3CA scaffolds was measured by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl
tetrazolium (MTT) assay after 4, 7, and 14 days of culture. The metabolically
active cells present in the scaffolds reduce the MTT dye into insoluble
purple crystals, which were subsequently dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide.
The absorbance of the purple-colored solution was measured at 570
nm using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) microplate reader
(Synergy HT, BioTek Instruments, Inc.).Alkaline phosphatase
(ALP) is an early marker for differentiation toward osteogenic phenotype.
The ALP activity of the Saos-2 cells was assessed by p-nitrophenyl phosphate (p-NPP) assay after 4 days
of culture. The cells were lysed with the radio-immunoprecipitation
assay (RIPA) buffer for the release of intracellular ALP enzymes,
and the p-NPP substrate was added to the lysate for
the formation of p-nitrophenol whose absorbance was
measured at 405 nm. The ALP activity was normalized to the total protein
content of the cells and is expressed as the activity unit per milligram
of protein.
Mineralization and Osteogenic Gene Expression
The matrix
mineralization in C3CA scaffolds by the Saos-2 cells was assessed
by Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining after 21 days of culture. The cell-seeded
scaffolds were stained with ARS (2.0 wt %) for 2 min, and after the
removal of excess stain, the scaffolds were destained with acetic
acid (10% v/v). The absorbance of the destained solution was measured
at 405 nm.The osteogenic differentiation of the Saos-2 cells
was determined by analyzing mRNA expression of runt-related transcription
factor 2 (RUNX 2), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and collagen type-1
(COL 1A) after 4 days of culture. The total RNA present in the cultured
cells was isolated by the TRIzol method, and about 2.5 μg of
RNA was reverse-transcribed to complementary DNA (cDNA) using a high-capacity
RNA-to-cDNA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Quantitative real-time
polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was carried out using TaqMan Universal
PCR master mix and gene expression assays using StepOnePlus real-time
PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The relative expressions of each
target gene were normalized against CT values of the housekeeping
gene (β-actin) by the 2–ddCT method, where
the ddCT values were calculated using eq . The gene expression in the cells without scaffolds
(cells only) was also analyzed to compare the expression pattern with
the cell-seeded scaffolds. The data are reported as relative gene
expression in osteogenic media (Ost) compared to standard culture
media as the control.
Subcutaneous
Implantation of Scaffolds
The ability
of C3CA scaffolds (processed at −20, −40, and −80
°C) to facilitate new tissue formation was evaluated by its subcutaneous
implantation in a rat model. All of the experimental procedures were
approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of Vellore Institute
of Technology, Tamil Nadu (VIT/IAEC/12). A total of 30 male Albino
Wistar rats (4–5 weeks old; weight, 180–220 g) were
used in this study. The rats were anesthetized with an intramuscular
injection of a mixture of ketamine (10 mg/kg body weight) and xylazine
(10 mg/kg body weight). After shaving the skin, longitudinal incisions
(1 cm) were made at three different regions in the dorsum of each
rat to create subcutaneous pockets. All three scaffolds (6 mm diameter
× 10 mm height) were inserted on either side of the same animal,
and the incisions were sutured and antisepticized. After 24 h, a dose
of antibiotics (sulfadoxine and trimethoprim at a 5:1 ratio, 15 mg/kg
body weight) was given to the rats. At 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days
post-implantation, the animals were euthanized by CO2 inhalation
and the implants with the surrounding tissues were excised and fixed
in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin for histological analysis. Five
animals per time point were used for the analysis. The implants excised
at 35 days post-implantation were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for
scanning electron microscopic analysis.
Histological Staining
Formalin-fixed implants were
dehydrated, embedded in paraffin wax, and serial longitudinal sections
of 5 μm thickness were made using a microtome (Leica, 2125RT).
The implant sections were stained with hematoxylin–eosin (H&E)
to elucidate histological features. Masson’s trichrome counter-staining
with light-green SF of the implant sections was used to identify the
collagen deposition in the implant sections. Immunohistochemical staining
of CD31 and osteocalcin markers in the implant sections was performed
using IHC staining kit (PathnSitu Biotechnologies Pvt Ltd., India).
A bright-field optical microscope was used to visualize the implant
sections at 10× and 20× magnifications (Olympus BX51).
Statistical Analysis
All quantitative data are reported
as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed statistically
by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc
test (p < 0.05) using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad
Software, Inc.). All of the data with p ≤
0.05 are considered statistically significant.
Authors: M G Raucci; M A Alvarez-Perez; C Demitri; D Giugliano; V De Benedictis; A Sannino; L Ambrosio Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Patricia Brassolatti; Paulo Sérgio Bossini; Ana Laura Martins de Andrade; Genoveva Lourdes Flores Luna; Juliana Virginio da Silva; Luciana Almeida-Lopes; Marcos Aurélio Napolitano; Lucimar Retto da Silva de Avó; Ângela Merice de Oliveira Leal; Fernanda de Freitas Anibal Journal: Acta Cir Bras Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 1.388