| Literature DB >> 35342231 |
Selcan Karakuş1, Mert Akın Insel2, İbrahim Mizan Kahyaoğlu3, İnci Albayrak4, Fulya Ustun-Alkan5.
Abstract
Currently, researchers are focusing on the development of nano-additive preservatives during the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic. This research aimed to constitute a small sized preservative nano-formulation which emerges from the biopolymer carboxymethyl cellulose (a green stabilizing agent) and hydromagnesite stromatolite (a fossilized natural additive). In this study, we investigated the optimization of the experimental design of carboxymethyl cellulose/hydromagnesite stromatolite (CMC/HS) bio-nanocomposites using a green and one-step sonochemical method at room temperature. In addition, we constructed a mathematical model which relates the intrinsic viscosity with all operating variables, and we carried out statistical error analysis to assess the validity of the proposed model. The characterization and chemical functional groups of CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites were determined by different advanced techniques such as SEM, HRTEM, DLS, FTIR, XRD, and BET. The challenge test was used to show the preservative efficacy of CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus brasiliensis. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was performed on L929 cells to evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicity of CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites. According to the results, we showed that the synthesized CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites have no cytototoxic effects on L929 fibroblast cells and could be considered to be an alternative green nano-additive preservative against pathogenic microorganisms.Entities:
Keywords: Biopolymer; Carboxymethyl cellulose; Nano-additive
Year: 2022 PMID: 35342231 PMCID: PMC8938648 DOI: 10.1007/s10570-022-04522-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cellulose (Lond) ISSN: 0969-0239 Impact factor: 6.123
Different experimental operating parameters for the design in the preparation of CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites
| Run | Sample | Experimental parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonication time (min) | Mass ratio of CMC/HS | Temperature (°C) | ||
| 1 | CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites (4:1) | 10 | 4:1 | 25 |
| 2 | 30 | 4:1 | 25 | |
| 3 | 60 | 4:1 | 25 | |
| 4 | 60 | 4:1 | 35 | |
| 5 | 60 | 4:1 | 45 | |
| 6 | CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites (3:1) | 10 | 3:1 | 25 |
| 7 | 30 | 3:1 | 25 | |
| 8 | 60 | 3:1 | 25 | |
| 9 | 60 | 3:1 | 35 | |
| 10 | 60 | 3:1 | 45 | |
| 11 | CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites (2:1) | 10 | 2:1 | 25 |
| 12 | 30 | 2:1 | 25 | |
| 13 | 60 | 2:1 | 25 | |
| 14 | 60 | 2:1 | 35 | |
| 15 | 60 | 2:1 | 45 | |
The design methodology for the CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites
| Run | Sample | Factors | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonication time | Mass ratio | Temperature | ||
| Levels | Levels | Levels | ||
| 1 | CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites (4:1) | − 1 | + 1 | − 1 |
| 2 | 0 | + 1 | − 1 | |
| 3 | + 1 | + 1 | − 1 | |
| 4 | + 1 | + 1 | 0 | |
| 5 | + 1 | + 1 | + 1 | |
| 6 | CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites (3:1) | − 1 | 0 | − 1 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | − 1 | |
| 8 | + 1 | 0 | − 1 | |
| 9 | + 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 10 | + 1 | 0 | + 1 | |
| 11 | CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites (2:1) | − 1 | + 1 | − 1 |
| 12 | 0 | + 1 | − 1 | |
| 13 | + 1 | + 1 | − 1 | |
| 14 | + 1 | + 1 | 0 | |
| 15 | + 1 | + 1 | + 1 | |
+ 1: maximum experimental parameter and − 1: minimum parameter for the experimental factors
The challenge test process for the synthesized CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites
| Microorganisms | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Medium | Temperature (°C) | ||
| NCTC 10788/Lot 0350520029 | Tryptic Soy Agar | 30–35 | |
| ATCC 9027/Lot 3270513 | Tryptic Soy Agar | 30–35 | |
| ATCC 8739/Lot 4835151 | Tryptic Soy Agar | 30–35 | |
| NCPF 3179/Lot 040920020 | Saboraud 4% Dextrose Agar | 20–25 | |
| NCPF 2275/Lot 020620065 | Saboraud 4% Dextrose Agar | 20–25 | |
The criteria for the preservative effectiveness test of the synthesized CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites
| Criteria A | ≧ 3 | ≧ 3 log | ≧ 3 log | ≧ 1 | ≧ 3 log | ≧ 1 log | ≧ 0 | ≧ 1 |
| Criteria B | Not performed | ≧ 3 | ≧ 3 log | Not performed | ≧ 1 | ≧ 1 log | ≧ 0 | ≧ 9 log |
Fig. 1SEM images of a HS and b CMC/HS, c TEM image and d hydrodynamic diameter distribution histogram of CMC/HS composite particles
Fig. 2XRD analysis of a mineral HS and b CMC/HS composite
Fig. 3FTIR results of (a) HS and (b) CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites
Fig. 4The effect of the concentration and the mass ratio of CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites (wt./wt.) on [η] (sonication time is fixed at 60 min and temperature at 25 °C) illustrated in 3D coordinates (a) and contour plot (b)
Fig. 5The effect of the sonication time (10–60 min) on [η] of the CMC/HS bio-nanocomposite (CMC/HS ratio is fixed at 1:2 and temperature at 25 °C) illustrated in 3D coordinates (a) and contour plot (b)
Fig. 6The effect of the temperature (25–45 °C) on [η] of the CMC/HS bio-nanocomposite (CMC/HS ratio is 1:2 and sonication time is 60 min)
Coefficients of the functions F1 and F2
| F | p00 | p10 | p01 | p20 | p11 | p02 | p30 | p21 | p12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | − 1.638 | 0.182 | 40.46 | 4.095e−4 | − 0.2101 | − 4.841 | 4.401e−7 | − 1.877e−4 | 6.122e−2 |
| F2 | 75.23 | − 0.1043 | 5.328e−2 | 9.697e−4 | − 3.054e−3 | N/A | − 1.198e−6 | 5.762e−6 | N/A |
Error analysis results of the constructed model
| Constructed model (Eq. | |
|---|---|
| SSE | 1090.99 |
| HYBRID | 11.2342 |
| MPSD | 27.5413 |
| ARE | 2.7405 |
Fig. 7Correlation diagram of calculated and experimental intrinsic viscosity values
Fig. 8The preservative results of the prepared CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites against pathogenic microorganisms a S. aureus, b P. aeruginosa, c E. coli, d C. albicans, and e A. brasiliensis
The comparison of biological activities of the various green bio-nanostructures
| Sample | Morphology | Microorganisms | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2/cellulose nanocomposites | Spherical, 100 nm | Zong et al. ( | |
| Kiwi peel phenolic extracts bio-reduced silver nanoparticles | Dendritic structure, 124 nm | Sun et al. ( | |
| Plant and lichen extracts-based Ag-MgO nanocomposites | Worm like, berries-like, needle-like, and semi-spherical 69–104 nm | Alavi and Karimi ( | |
| Selenium nanoparticles | Polygonal and 83 nm | Ndwandwe et al. ( | |
| CMC stabilized nano silver | Spherical, 5–15 nm | Prema et al. ( | |
| Nanocellulose/CMC and nanochitosan/CMC composite films | – | Jannatyha et al. ( | |
| Polyvinyl alcohol-CMC/ZnO nanocomposite | Fiber, 214–239 nm | Darbasizadeh et al. ( | |
| CMC supported gold nanoparticles | Spherical, 12–20 nm | Fouda et al. ( | |
| CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites | 2D layers, 100 nm | This study |
Fig. 9a Control (untreated cells), b cells treated with 100 µg/ml of CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites, c cell survival (MTT assay) of L929 cells exposed to the CMC, HS, and CMC/HS bio-nanocomposites for 24 h and d the image of MTT assay