Literature DB >> 3890194

The quality of life of cancer patients: a review of the literature.

J C de Haes, F C van Knippenberg.   

Abstract

In recent years the necessity of including quality of life (QL) measurement in cancer research has been stressed. In this paper an overview is given of the results of studies into the QL of cancer patients. From descriptive studies it appears that the quality of certain domains of life is impaired by cancer treatment. Results from studies in which two or more groups of cancer patients are being compared are not consistent. The expectation that the QL of patients is impaired more negatively by certain treatment modalities is confirmed in some studies but not in several others. Even the assumption that the QL of cancer patients is worse than the QL of the normal population is not substantiated. In this paper explanations for these unexpected results are forwarded. First, the definition and operationalization of the concept QL differs from one study to another. QL may either refer to an overall evaluation or to the evaluation of certain domains of life, and, either to the subjective experience of the patient or the evaluation of the situation by others. Secondly, other methodological difficulties especially with respect to reliability, validity and design are described. Finally, it is suggested that psychological mechanisms may account for the absence of differences between cancer patients and others and may therefore, on theoretical grounds, explain the established inconsistencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3890194     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90335-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  52 in total

1.  Views of psycho-oncology health professionals on priority psycho-oncology research questions.

Authors:  Nicole M Rankin; Phyllis N Butow; Melanie A Price; Alison Evans
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The impact of nausea and vomiting upon quality of life measures.

Authors:  J M Bliss; B Robertson; P J Selby
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1992-12

3.  Quality of life: a model for evaluating health for all. Conceptual considerations and policy implications.

Authors:  B Lindström
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1992

4.  Social support exchange and quality of life among the Korean elderly.

Authors:  H K Kim; M Hisata; I Kai; S K Lee
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2000

5.  Assessment of quality of life in patients treated for low-grade glioma: a preliminary report.

Authors:  M J Taphoorn; J J Heimans; F J Snoek; J Lindeboom; B Oosterink; J G Wolbers; A B Karim
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  The distinction between affect and cognition in the quality of life of cancer patients--sensitivity and stability.

Authors:  J C de Haes; J H de Ruiter; R Tempelaar; B J Pennink
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Quality of life in higher resolution: the next generation of comparative effectiveness research in malignant hematology.

Authors:  Thomas W LeBlanc; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 8.  Methods of assessing the effect of drug therapy on quality of life.

Authors:  P A Ganz
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  The European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire: implications for prognosis in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Digant Gupta; Christopher G Lis; James F Grutsch
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2006

10.  The impact of generalized malignant melanoma on quality of life evaluated by the EORTC questionnaire technique.

Authors:  V Sigurdardóttir; C Bolund; Y Brandberg; M Sullivan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.