| Literature DB >> 33488859 |
Małgorzata Mizerska-Wasiak1, Dominika Adamczuk1, Karolina Cichoń-Kawa1, Monika Miklaszewska2, Hanna Szymanik-Grzelak1, Jacek A Pietrzyk2, Agnieszka Pukajło-Marczyk3, Danuta Zwolińska3, Agnieszka Rybi-Szumińska4, Anna Wasilewska4, Beata Bieniaś5, Przemysław Sikora5, Agnieszka Firszt-Adamczyk6, Roman Stankiewicz6, Maria Szczepańska7, Małgorzata Pańczyk-Tomaszewska1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) may lead to end stage renal disease and severely affect patient functioning and wellbeing. The aim of the study was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents with IgAN, and compare HRQoL in relation to the disease course, social status and psychological factors, such as expressing anger and perceived personal competence.Entities:
Keywords: IgA nephropathy; Kidscreen-52; children; health-related quality of life
Year: 2020 PMID: 33488859 PMCID: PMC7811315 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2020.100367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Clinical characteristics of the study group
| Parameter | Study group ( |
|---|---|
| Age at disease onset [years] | 9.79 ±4.36 |
| Disease duration [years] | 4.98 ±3.90 |
| Gender, | |
| Male | 32 (62.75) |
| Female | 19 (37.25) |
| Body mass index [kg/m2] | 21.87 (13.87–30.42) |
| Area of residence, | |
| Rural | 22 (43.14) |
| Urban | 29 (56.86) |
| Education level of the primary caretaker, | |
| Vocational | 10 (19.61) |
| High school | 20 (39.22) |
| University level | 15 (29.41) |
| No data | 6 (11.76) |
| Employment of the primary caretaker, | |
| Yes | 33 (64.71) |
| No | 17 (33.33) |
| No data | 1 (1.96) |
| Family model, | |
| Traditional | 45 (88.24) |
| Mother + children | 4 (7.8) |
| Mother + partner | 1 (1.96) |
| No data | 1 (1.96) |
| Mode of education, | |
| Regular schooling | 44 (86.28) |
| Individualized education at school | 4 (7.84) |
| Individualized education at home | 3 (5.88) |
| eGFR | 107.25 (48.8–178.97) |
| Proteinuria, | 39 (76.49) |
| Hypertension, | 13 (25.5) |
| Past steroid treatment, | 36 (70.59) |
| Current steroid treatment, | 15 (29.41) |
| Current immunosuppressive treatment, | 10 (19.61) |
Kidscreen-52 questionnaire findings in the study group
| Parameter | Study group ( | Reference values | Boys ( | Reference values in boys | Girls ( | Reference values in girls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean score ± SD | |||||||
| Physical well-being | 62.84 ±20.25 | 70.21 ±17.35 | 65.78 ±21.44 | 72.71 ±18.50 | 57.89 ±17.51 | 66.54 ±19.52 | |
| Psychological well-being | 66.83 ±18.86 | 68.02 ±18.78 | 69.53 ±18.41 | 78.05 ±17.29 | 62.28 ±19.22 | 75.30 ±19.08 | [ |
| Overall mood | 77.31 ±17.07 | 71.55 ±16.67 | 77.68 ±18.39 | 81.00±18.70 | 76.69 ±15.03 | 76.24 ±18.19 | |
| Self-perception | 69.71 ±21.71 | 69.67 ±20.65 | 71.09 ±20.90 | 78.85 ±17.78 | 67.37 ±23.41 | 68.39 ±22.22 | |
| Leisure time – autonomy | 67.84 ±19.86 | 66.05 ±19.80 | 70.16 ±19.94 | 75.41 ±19.77 | 63.95 ±19.62 | 70.36 ±21.71 | |
| Relations with parents | 78.27 ±19.14 | 73.27 ±19.71 | 77.86 ±20.01 | 80.02 ±18.08 | 78.95 ±18.08 | 77.91 ±20.28 | |
| Financial resources | 69.44 ±28.41 | 56.11 ±27.68 | 65.10 ±28.51 | 71.83 ±26.64 | 76.75 ±27.44 | 70.92 ±26.72 | |
| Social support and peers | 62.91 ±23.17 | 64.62 ±21.40 | 63.54 ±21.56 | 73.03 ±19.37 | 61.84 ±26.25 | 74.38 ±19.45 | |
| School environment | 62.99 ±20.88 | 56.78 ±20.02 | 61.20 ±20.78 | 65.45 ±21.33 | 66.01 ±21.26 | 67.24 ±20.47 | |
| Social acceptance | 91.67 ±16.67 | 86.34 ±18.83 | 88.80 ±19.70 | 88.53 ±16.69 | 96.49 ±8.01 | 89.24 ±16.36 | |
Study group vs. reference values, p = 0.055.
Study group vs. reference values, p < 0.05.
3,4,5,6Boys vs. reference values in boys, p < 0.05.
7,8Girls vs. reference values in girls, p < 0.05.
Kidscreen-52 questionnaire findings in relation to the place of residence
| Parameter | Urban area | Rural area | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | |||
| Physical well-being | 63.28 ±20.41 | 62.27 ±20.51 | NS |
| Psychological well-being | 67.53 ±17.12 | 65.91 ±21.31 | NS |
| Overall mood | 75.86 ±16.85 | 79.22 ±17.55 | NS |
| Self-perception | 69.48 ±20.28 | 70.00 ±23.95 | NS |
| Leisure time – autonomy | 66.21 ±18.93 | 70.00 ±21.27 | NS |
| Relations with parents | 77.16 ±18.42 | 79.73 ±20.38 | NS |
| Financial resources | 66.09 ±30.04 | 73.86 ±26.14 | NS |
| Social support and peers | 63.22 ±21.01 | 62.50 ±26.26 | NS |
| School environment | 60.78 ±20.18 | 65.91 ±21.88 | NS |
| Social acceptance | 90.52 ±20.50 | 93.18 ±9.84 | NS |
Personal competence (KompOs) scale findings
| Parameter | Overall score | Subscale A – perceived strength | Subscale B – perceived persistence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | ||||
| Study group, | 36.38 ±7.54 | 18.98 ±4.04 | 17.40 ±4.52 | < 0.05 |
| Reference group | – | 17.09 ±3.25 | 16.93 ±3.15 | |
| Study group – boys, | 38.04 ±5.64 | 19.81 ±3.22 | 17.53 ±4.77 | < 0.05 |
| Reference group – boys | 34.04 ±5.04 | 17.44 ±3.21 | 16.6 ±3.23 | |
| Study group – girls, | 34.11 ±6.59 | 17.83 ±3.42 | 16.28 ±4.27 | NS |
| Reference group – girls | 34.00 ±5.10 | 16.74 ±3.29 | 17.26 ±3.07 | |
| Study group – rural area residents, | 36.20 ±6.76 | 19.20 ±4.11 | 17.00 ±4.24 | NS |
| Reference group – rural area residents | 34.73 ±4.83 | 17.34 ±2.91 | 17.39 ±3.21 | |
| Study group – urban area residents, | 36.68 ±5.99 | 18.88 ±2.80 | 17.80 ±4.06 | < 0.05 |
| Reference group – urban area residents | 33.63 ±5.1 | 16.68 ±3.67 | 16.92 ±3.01 | |
P < 0.05 – perceived strength in study group vs reference group.
P < 0.05 – perceived strength in boys from study group vs. boys from reference group.
P < 0.05 – perceived strength in urban area residents from study group vs. urban area residents from reference group.
Anger Expression Scale (SEG) findings
| Parameter | Expressed anger | Suppressed anger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | |||
| Study group, | 24.11 ±7.49 | 32.19 ±6.64 | < 0.001 |
| Reference group | 27.65 ±6.81 | 28.06 ±7.07 | |
| Study group – boys, | 23.04 ±7.21 | 32.57 ±6.64 | NS |
| Reference group – boys | 27.61 ±6.82 | 28.35 ±7.07 | |
| Study group – girls, | 25.78 ±7.84 | 31.61 ±6.79 | NS |
| Reference group – girls | 27.68 ±6.08 | 27.31 ±7.09 | |
| Study group – rural area residents, | 24.47 ±7.87 | 32.95 ±6.40 | < 0.05 |
| Reference group – rural area residents | 27.27 ±6.48 | 27.14 ±6.41 | |
| Study group – urban area residents, | 24.38 ±6.96 | 32.42 ±5.75 | < 0.05 |
| Reference group – urban area residents | 27.8 ±6.48 | 28.40 ±7.28 | |
Expressed anger in study group vs. reference group p < 0.001.
Suppresed anger in study group vs. reference group p < 0.05.
Expressed anger in study group (rural area residents) vs. reference group from rural area p < 0.05.
Suppressed anger in study group (rural area residents) vs. reference group from rural area p < 0.01.
Expressed anger in study group (urban area residents) vs. reference group from urban area p < 0.05.
Suppresed anger in study group (urban area residents) vs. reference group from urban area p < 0.01.