Literature DB >> 33488844

New Approach for Risk Estimation Algorithms of BRCA1/2 Negativeness Detection with Modelling Supervised Machine Learning Techniques.

Hulya Yazici1, Demet Akdeniz Odemis1, Dogukan Aksu2, Ozge Sukruoglu Erdogan1, Seref Bugra Tuncer1, Mukaddes Avsar1, Seda Kilic1, Gozde Kuru Turkcan1, Betul Celik1, Muhammed Ali Aydin2.   

Abstract

BRCA1/2 gene testing is a difficult, expensive, and time-consuming test which requires excessive work load. The identification of the BRCA1/2 gene mutations is significantly important in the selection of treatment and the risk of secondary cancer. We aimed to develop an algorithm considering all the clinical, demographic, and genetic features of patients for identifying the BRCA1/2 negativity in the present study. An experimental dataset was created with the collection of the all clinical, demographic, and genetic features of breast cancer patients for 20 years. This dataset consisted of 125 features of 2070 high-risk breast cancer patients. All data were numeralized and normalized for detection of the BRCA1/2 negativity in the machine learning algorithm. The performance of the algorithm was identified by studying the machine learning model with the test data. k nearest neighbours (KNN) and decision tree (DT) accuracy rates of 9 features involving Dataset 2 were found to be the most effective. The removal of the unnecessary data in the dataset by reducing the number of features was shown to increase the accuracy rate of algorithm compared with the DT. BRCA1/2 negativity was identified without performing the BRCA1/2 gene test with 92.88% accuracy within minutes in high-risk breast cancer patients with this algorithm, and the test associated result waiting stress, time, and money loss were prevented. That algorithm is suggested be useful in fast performing of the treatment plans of patients and accurately in addition to speeding up the clinical practice.
Copyright © 2020 Hulya Yazici et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33488844      PMCID: PMC7787793          DOI: 10.1155/2020/8594090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Markers        ISSN: 0278-0240            Impact factor:   3.434


  28 in total

Review 1.  Machine Learning for Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Bradley J Erickson; Panagiotis Korfiatis; Zeynettin Akkus; Timothy L Kline
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network.

Authors:  H P Chan; S C Lo; B Sahiner; K L Lam; M A Helvie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  BRCA1 sequence analysis in women at high risk for susceptibility mutations. Risk factor analysis and implications for genetic testing.

Authors:  D Shattuck-Eidens; A Oliphant; M McClure; C McBride; J Gupte; T Rubano; D Pruss; S V Tavtigian; D H Teng; N Adey; M Staebell; K Gumpper; R Lundstrom; M Hulick; M Kelly; J Holmen; B Lingenfelter; S Manley; F Fujimura; M Luce; B Ward; L Cannon-Albright; L Steele; K Offit; A Thomas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Machine Learning in Medicine.

Authors:  Rahul C Deo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  T S Frank; S A Manley; O I Olopade; S Cummings; J E Garber; B Bernhardt; K Antman; D Russo; M E Wood; L Mullineau; C Isaacs; B Peshkin; S Buys; V Venne; P T Rowley; S Loader; K Offit; M Robson; H Hampel; D Brener; E P Winer; S Clark; B Weber; L C Strong; A Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Karoline B Kuchenbaecker; John L Hopper; Daniel R Barnes; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Thea M Mooij; Marie-José Roos-Blom; Sarah Jervis; Flora E van Leeuwen; Roger L Milne; Nadine Andrieu; David E Goldgar; Mary Beth Terry; Matti A Rookus; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou; Lesley McGuffog; D Gareth Evans; Daniel Barrowdale; Debra Frost; Julian Adlard; Kai-Ren Ong; Louise Izatt; Marc Tischkowitz; Ros Eeles; Rosemarie Davidson; Shirley Hodgson; Steve Ellis; Catherine Nogues; Christine Lasset; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Laurence Faivre; Pascaline Berthet; Maartje J Hooning; Lizet E van der Kolk; Carolien M Kets; Muriel A Adank; Esther M John; Wendy K Chung; Irene L Andrulis; Melissa Southey; Mary B Daly; Saundra S Buys; Ana Osorio; Christoph Engel; Karin Kast; Rita K Schmutzler; Trinidad Caldes; Anna Jakubowska; Jacques Simard; Michael L Friedlander; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Eva Machackova; Lenka Foretova; Yen Y Tan; Christian F Singer; Edith Olah; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Brita Arver; Håkan Olsson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Hybrid ICA-Bayesian network approach reveals distinct effective connectivity differences in schizophrenia.

Authors:  D Kim; J Burge; T Lane; G D Pearlson; K A Kiehl; V D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Identifying Novel Candidate Genes Related to Apoptosis from a Protein-Protein Interaction Network.

Authors:  Baoman Wang; Fei Yuan; Xiangyin Kong; Lan-Dian Hu; Yu-Dong Cai
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Identifying New Candidate Genes and Chemicals Related to Prostate Cancer Using a Hybrid Network and Shortest Path Approach.

Authors:  Fei Yuan; You Zhou; Meng Wang; Jing Yang; Kai Wu; Changhong Lu; Xiangyin Kong; Yu-Dong Cai
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.