Literature DB >> 33488470

Implicit Detection Observation in Different Features, Exposure Duration, and Delay During Change Blindness.

Wang Xiang1,2.   

Abstract

To investigate whether implicit detection occurs uniformly during change blindness with single or combination feature stimuli, and whether implicit detection is affected by exposure duration and delay, two one-shot change detection experiments are designed. The implicit detection effect is measured by comparing the reaction times (RTs) of baseline trials, in which stimulus exhibits no change and participants report "same," and change blindness trials, in which the stimulus exhibits a change but participants report "same." If the RTs of blindness trials are longer than those of baseline trials, implicit detection has occurred. The strength of the implicit detection effect was measured by the difference in RTs between the baseline and change blindness trials, where the larger the difference, the stronger the implicit detection effect. In both Experiments 1 and 2, the results showed that the RTs of change blindness trials were significantly longer than those of baseline trials. Whether under set size 4, 6, or 8, the RTs of the change blindness trials were significantly longer than those in the baseline trials. In Experiment 1, the difference between the baseline trials' RTs and change blindness trials' RTs of the single features was significantly larger than that of the combination features. However, in Experiment 2, the difference between the baseline trials' RTs and the change blindness trials' RTs of single features was significantly smaller than that of the combination features. In Experiment 1a, when the exposure duration was shorter, the difference between the baseline and change blindness trials' RTs was smaller. In Experiment 2, when the delay was longer, the difference between the two trials' RTs was larger. These results suggest that regardless of whether the change occurs in a single or a combination of features and whether there is a long exposure duration or delay, implicit detection occurs uniformly during the change blindness period. Moreover, longer exposure durations and delays strengthen the implicit detection effect. Set sizes had no significant impact on implicit detection.
Copyright © 2021 Xiang.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implicit detection; change blindness; delay; exposure duration; set size; stimulus feature

Year:  2021        PMID: 33488470      PMCID: PMC7820674          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  34 in total

1.  Explicit mechanisms do not account for implicit localization and identification of change: An empirical reply to Mitroff et al. (2002).

Authors:  Diego Fernandez-Duque; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Implicit change identification: a replication of Fernandez-Duque and Thornton (2003).

Authors:  Cédric Laloyaux; Arnaud Destrebecqz; Axel Cleeremans
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Unconscious processing of an abstract concept.

Authors:  Zhicheng Lin; Scott O Murray
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11-27

4.  Nothing compares 2 views: change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information.

Authors:  Stephen R Mitroff; Daniel J Simons; Daniel T Levin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-11

5.  Feature binding, attention and object perception.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Visual long-term memory and change blindness: Different effects of pre- and post-change information on one-shot change detection using meaningless geometric objects.

Authors:  Megumi Nishiyama; Jun Kawaguchi
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2014-10-01

7.  Priming effects under correct change detection and change blindness.

Authors:  Corrado Caudek; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2012-09-07

8.  Change blindness and inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Melinda S Jensen; Richard Yao; Whitney N Street; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-03-01

9.  Unconscious orientation processing.

Authors:  Reza Rajimehr
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Frontal and parietal theta burst TMS impairs working memory for visual-spatial conjunctions.

Authors:  Helen M Morgan; Margaret C Jackson; Martijn G van Koningsbruggen; Kimron L Shapiro; David E J Linden
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.