Literature DB >> 26302304

Change blindness and inattentional blindness.

Melinda S Jensen1, Richard Yao1, Whitney N Street1, Daniel J Simons1.   

Abstract

Change blindness and inattentional blindness are both failures of visual awareness. Change blindness is the failure to notice an obvious change. Inattentional blindness is the failure to notice the existence of an unexpected item. In each case, we fail to notice something that is clearly visible once we know to look for it. Despite similarities, each type of blindness has a unique background and distinct theoretical implications. Here, we discuss the central paradigms used to explore each phenomenon in a historical context. We also outline the central findings from each field and discuss their implications for visual perception and attention. In addition, we examine the impact of task and observer effects on both types of blindness as well as common pitfalls and confusions people make while studying these topics. WIREs Cogni Sci 2011 2 529-546 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.130 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 26302304     DOI: 10.1002/wcs.130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1939-5078


  16 in total

1.  Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access from the perspective of capacity-unlimited working memory.

Authors:  Steven Gross
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Oxygen Metabolism-induced Stress Response Underlies Heart-brain Interaction Governing Human Consciousness-breaking and Attention.

Authors:  Xiao-Juan Xue; Rui Su; Ze-Feng Li; Xiao-Ou Bu; Peng Dang; Si-Fang Yu; Zhi-Xin Wang; Dong-Mei Chen; Tong-Ao Zeng; Ming Liu; Hai-Lin Ma; De-Long Zhang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 5.203

3.  Expectation-based blindness: Predictions about object categories gate awareness of focally attended objects.

Authors:  Alon Zivony; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-05-17

4.  Developmental origins of cognitive offloading.

Authors:  Kristy L Armitage; Adam Bulley; Jonathan Redshaw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Attention as a process of selection, perception as a process of representation, and phenomenal experience as the resulting process of perception being modulated by a dedicated consciousness mechanism.

Authors:  Talis Bachmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-29

6.  Elucidating unconscious processing with instrumental hypnosis.

Authors:  Mathieu Landry; Krystèle Appourchaux; Amir Raz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-28

7.  Monocular Presentation Attenuates Change Blindness During the Use of Augmented Reality.

Authors:  Akihiko Kitamura; Yasunori Kinosada; Kazumitsu Shinohara
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-07-31

8.  Implicit Detection Observation in Different Features, Exposure Duration, and Delay During Change Blindness.

Authors:  Wang Xiang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-08

9.  Causality and continuity close the gaps in event representations.

Authors:  Jonathan F Kominsky; Lewis Baker; Frank C Keil; Brent Strickland
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-10-06

10.  Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; Philip M Jones; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; George Kovacs
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.