Literature DB >> 17154778

Implicit change identification: a replication of Fernandez-Duque and Thornton (2003).

Cédric Laloyaux1, Arnaud Destrebecqz, Axel Cleeremans.   

Abstract

Using a simple change detection task involving vertical and horizontal stimuli, I. M. Thornton and D. Fernandez-Duque (2000) showed that the implicit detection of a change in the orientation of an item influences performance in a subsequent orientation judgment task. However, S. R. Mitroff, D. J. Simons, and S. L. Franconeri (2002) were not able to replicate this finding after correcting for confounds and thus attributed Thornton and Fernandez-Duque's results to methodological artifacts. Because Mitroff et al.'s failure to replicate might in turn have stemmed from several methodological differences between their study and those of Thornton and Fernandez-Duque (2000) and Fernandez-Duque and Thornton, the current authors set out to conduct a further replication in which they corrected all known methodological biases identified so far. The results suggest that implicit change detection indeed occurs: People's conscious decisions about the orientation of an item appear to be influenced by previous undetected changes in the orientation of other items in the display. Implications of this finding in light of current theories of visual awareness are discussed. (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17154778     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  Unconscious perception of a flash can trigger line motion illusion.

Authors:  Manuel J Blanco; David Soto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Ensemble coding of crowd speed using biological motion.

Authors:  Tram T N Nguyen; Quoc C Vuong; George Mather; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Event-related potentials reveal rapid registration of features of infrequent changes during change blindness.

Authors:  Pessi Lyyra; Jan Wikgren; Piia Astikainen
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.759

4.  Explicit behavioral detection of visual changes develops without their implicit neurophysiological detectability.

Authors:  Pessi Lyyra; Jan Wikgren; Timo Ruusuvirta; Piia Astikainen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Implicit processing during change blindness revealed with mouse-contingent and gaze-contingent displays.

Authors:  Andrey Chetverikov; Maria Kuvaldina; W Joseph MacInnes; Ómar I Jóhannesson; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  An EEG study of detection without localisation in change blindness.

Authors:  Catriona L Scrivener; Asad Malik; Jade Marsh; Michael Lindner; Etienne B Roesch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Implicit Detection Observation in Different Features, Exposure Duration, and Delay During Change Blindness.

Authors:  Wang Xiang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-08

8.  Is It Implicit Detection or Perception During Change Blindness?

Authors:  Wang Xiang
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2020-11-24

9.  Consciousness doesn't overflow cognition.

Authors:  Richard Brown
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.