| Literature DB >> 33481809 |
Munenori Honda1, Hideaki Naoe1, Ryosuke Gushima1, Hideaki Miyamoto1, Masakuni Tateyama1, Kouichi Sakurai2, Yasushi Oda3, Yoshitaka Murakami4, Yasuhito Tanaka1.
Abstract
Risk stratification by index colonoscopy is well established for first surveillance endoscopy, but whether the previous two colonoscopies affect the subsequent advanced neoplasias has not been established. Therefore, the subsequent risk based on the findings of the index and first surveillance colonoscopies were investigated. This retrospective, cohort study was conducted in two clinics and included participants who had undergone two or more colonoscopies after index colonoscopy. High-risk was defined as advanced adenoma (≥ 1 cm, or tubulovillous or villous histology, or high-grade dysplasia). Based on the findings of the index and first surveillance colonoscopies, patients were classified into four categories: category A (both colonoscopy findings were normal), category B (no high-risk findings both times), category C (one time high-risk finding), and category D (high-risk findings both times). The incidence of subsequent advanced neoplasia was examined in each category. A total of 13,426 subjects were included and surveyed during the study periods. The subjects in category D had the highest risk of advanced neoplasia (27.4%, n = 32/117). The subjects in category A had the lowest risk (4.0%, n = 225/5,583). The hazard ratio for advanced neoplasia of category D compared to category A was 9.90 (95% Confidence interval 6.82-14.35, P<0.001). Classification based on the findings of index and first surveillance colonoscopies more effectively stratifies the risk of subsequent advanced neoplasia, resulting in more proper allocation of colonoscopy resources after two consecutive colonoscopies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33481809 PMCID: PMC7822265 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245211
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240