Markos-Orestis Georgiadis1, Violeta Kourbeli1, Ioannis P Papanastasiou1, Andrew Tsotinis1, Martin C Taylor2, John M Kelly2. 1. Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry , Department of Pharmacy , School of Health Sciences , National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Panepistimioupoli-Zografou , 157 84 Athens , Greece . Email: papanastasiou@pharm.uoa.gr. 2. Department of Pathogen Molecular Biology , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , Keppel Street , London WC1 E7HT , UK.
The African sleeping sickness and the Chagas disease are two of the major neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). The trypanosomiases are vector-borne parasitic infections caused by flagellated protozoa of the class Kinetoplastida.1 There are two species of human-infectious trypanosomes, Trypanosoma brucei, that causes human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), and Trypanosoma cruzi, which is responsible for the Chagas disease. HAT is prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, transmitted by the bite of a tsetse fly infected with one of the two subspecies, Trypanosoma brucei gambiense or Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense. The Chagas disease is spread predominantly in Latin and Central America by Triatominae bugs infected with T. cruzi.2,3 Trypanosomiases, as with other NTDs, are becoming public health problems in non-endemic countries, as a result of travel and migration. New drugs are urgently required, as those that are currently available are characterized by side-effects and treatment failures.4,5Various initiatives6–8 have led to the discovery of promiscuous trypanocidal derivatives from phenotypic high-throughput screening of a number of compound libraries. These have been further refined and optimized to enhance drug-like properties. The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), in partnership with the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), and the Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation (GNF) have described the amide and urea derivatives of thiazolethylamines I, II and sulfonamides III, shown in Fig. 1, as potent trypanocidals.6,7
Fig. 1
General type scaffolds with trypanocidal activity.
Based on these findings and our involvement in the adamantane chemistry,9–20 we report herein on the chemistry and biology of thiazole derivatives of the general type scaffold IV. The thiazole moiety is an important pharmacophore in many compounds used against several tropical infectious diseases.21Scaffold IV includes a 1,3-thiazole moiety, which is 2,4-disubstituted. One substituent is the lipophilic end of the scaffold, which consists of a phenyl ring bearing fluoro- and 1-adamantyl-functionalities. The 4-(1-adamantyl)phenyl substituent has been proven to be well tolerated and is endowed with trypanocidal properties.22 The thiazole ring bears a variety of functional groups (Fig. 2).
2-Phenylthiazol-4-ethylamines 1a–d and 2a–d share the same structural features, apart from the relative position of the 1-adamantyl core and the addition of a fluoro-substituent in series 1. Fluorine alters the biophysical and chemical properties, such as lipophilicity, acidity, as well as the reactivity and conformation of the substituted derivatives.23 In 2018, 18 out of the 38 small drug molecules, that were approved by the FDA, contain a fluorine atom.24,25 Derivatives 3 differ in the thiazole moiety compared to adducts 1 and 2. The 2,4-substituents of the thiazoles 2a, c have their positions switched in derivatives 3c, d. The functionalization of the amino-end of congeners 1 involves various amide (aromatic and non-aromatic) and urea substituents. In adducts 2, the polar heads were translocated to the functional end of the general type scaffold IV. The length of the side chain of derivatives 2e, 2g and 3e was kept at the distance of three atoms (2C and 1N and vice versa), which in the derivatives I, II and III was found to be the optimal length for enhanced trypanocidal potency.6–8 The length of the R group is different in adducts 2f, h and 3a, b. 2-Aminothiazole (adduct 3a), is a frequent-hitting fragment in biophysical binding assays.26 Moreover, an analogous thiazole guanidinium system of derivative 3e has been used as a substitute for other aromatic rings improving biological activity.27The relative position of the adamantane cage, the phenyl ring and the thiazole moiety was altered in derivatives 4a, c. Compounds 4a, c bear the same thiazole ring substituents as derivatives 2 and 3. Additionally, the adamantane core was replaced in the camphor skeleton in adducts 4b, 4. The latter molecules are sulfonamides in alignment with the scaffolds of compounds III.7
Results and discussion
Synthesis
The 4-substituted-2[3-(adamant-1-yl)-4-fluorophenyl]thiazoles 1a–j were synthesized as shown in Scheme 1. As starting material, for the synthesis of thiazoles 1a–j, the (3-adamant-1-yl)-(4-fluorophenyl)boronic acid (6) was used. The reported method for the preparation of the boronic acid 6 (ref. 28) has been modified, by changing the reaction times. The synthetic route involved a Suzuki–Miyaura palladium-catalyzed coupling between the boronic acid 6 and the 2-thiazole bromide 7 (ref. 6) to provide the phthalimide protected adamantane derivative 8. The hydrazinolysis of phthalimide derivative 8 led to the deprotected parent compound 2-{2-[3-(adamant-1-yl)-4-fluorophenyl]thiazol-4-yl}ethan-1-amine (1a), which was subsequently methylated, dimethylated,29 acylated and carbamoylated to deliver adducts 1b–j, via the procedures shown in Scheme 1.
Scheme 1
Reagents and conditions: (a) i. n-BuLi, THF, –78 °C, 20 min, ii. (i-PrO)3B, r.t. 18 h, 90%; (b) Pd(PPh3)4, Na2CO3, anh. toluene, 80 °C, 18 h, 80%; (c) H2NNH2.H2O, EtOH, reflux, 1 h; (d) i. ClCOOEt, NEt3, THF, r.t. 18 h, ii. LiAlH4, THF, reflux 4 h, iii. EtOH, H2O, NaOH 10%, 0 °C, 88% from 8; (e) MeONa, CH3COOH, HCHO 38% in H2O, NaBH3CN, MeOH, r.t. 18 h, 75% from 8. (f) Benzoyl chloride (1f: 96% from 8) or 4-fluorobenzoyl chloride (1g: 93% from 8) or 1-piperidinecarbonyl chloride (1j: 36% from 8) or 1-pyrrolidinecarbonyl chloride (1i: 46% from 8), Et3N, EtOAc, r.t. 18 h; (g) acetic anhydride (1d: 84% from 8) or butyric anhydride (1e: 92% for 8), Et3N, EtOAc, r.t. 48 h; (h) 3-methyl-furoic acid, EDCI, HOBt, DMAP, DMF/DCM, 45 °C, 18 h, 29% from 8.
The synthesis of the 4-substituted-2[4-(adamant-1-yl)phenyl]thiazoles 2a–d was realized following two synthetic pathways, as illustrated in Scheme 2. The key-compound for the preparation of the thiazoles 2a–h, the 2-{2-[(2-(adamant-1-yl)phenyl)thiazol-4-yl]ethyl}isoindoline-1,3-dione (10) was obtained via two different synthetic routes. The first involves a Suzuki–Miyaura30 palladium-catalysed coupling between the 4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-2-[4-(adamant-1-yl)phenyl]-2H-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (9)31 and the 2-thiazole bromide 7, which led to the protected precursor 10. The second synthetic approach, towards the thiazole adduct 10, was based on the Hantzsch condensation32 of thiobenzamide 14 with the α-bromoketone 15.6 Our lab has previously published the preparation of the 4-(adamant-1-yl)benzoic acid (12),31 which was now obtained by a different transition metal ion catalyzed oxidation of 1-(4-tolyl)adamantane (11).33 The reported method of oxidation34 was modified as the reaction mixture was bubbled with oxygen gas and heated at 105 °C for 6 h. The benzoic acid 12 was subsequently converted to the corresponding benzamide 13 and the thiobenzamide 14. Comparing the two methods, the first involves 5 steps (17% total yield), while the second 6 steps (25% total yield), a more facile work-up and cheaper reagents. The parent thiazole 2a was methylated, dimethylated and acetylated to the respective congeners 2b–d, as previously shown.
Scheme 2
Reagents and conditions: (a) Pd(PPh3)4, Na2CO3, anh. toluene, 80 °C, 18 h, 87%; (b) O2, NaBr, Mn(OAc)2, Co(OAc)2, AcOH/dioxane, 90 °C, 6 h, 89%; (c) i. SOCl2, 65 °C, 45 min, ii. aq. NH3, 25%, r.t. 1 h, 96%; (d) Lawesson's reagent, dioxane, 110 °C, 2 h, 50%; (e) i-PrOH, autoclave, 120 °C, 18 h, 65%; (f) H2NNH2·H2O, EtOH, reflux 1 h; (g) acetic anhydride, Et3N, EtOAc, r.t. 48 h, 53% from 10; (h) i. ClCOOEt, NEt3, THF, r.t. 18 h, ii. LiAlH4, THF, reflux 4 h, iii. EtOH, H2O, NaOH 10%, 0 °C, 54% from 10; (i) MeONa, CH3COOH, HCHO 38% in H2O, NaBH3CN, MeOH, r.t. 18 h, 85% from 10.
The functionalized thiazoles 2e–h were obtained by the route shown in Scheme 3. The thiobenzamide 14 was condensed with 1,3-dichloroacetone and 4-chloroacetoacetate, under Hantzsch reaction conditions, to give the chloromethylthiazole 15 and the thiazolethyl acetate 16, respectively. Treatment of the choromethylthiazole 15 with KCN or KSCN led to the respective cyanide 2e and the thiocyanide 2f. The thiazolethyl acetate 16 was reduced to the corresponding alcohol 2g, which was then converted to the azide 2h, via activation of the methanesulphonyl derivative 17.
Scheme 3
Reagents and conditions: (a) 1,3-dichloroacetone, acetone, reflux, 18 h, 75%; (b) KCN, anh. DMF, 60 °C, 36 h (2e: 41%) or KSCN, EtOH, 45 °C, 18 h (2f: 67%); (c) 4-chloroacetoacetate, i-PrOH, autoclave, 120 °C, 18 h, 92%; (d) i. LiAlH4, THF, r.t. 2 h, ii. EtOH, H2O, NaOH 10%, 0 °C, 80%; (e) MsCl, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C then r.t. 18 h, 95%; (f) NaN3, anh. DMF, 60 °C, 2 h, 65%.
The synthesis of the 2-substituted-4-{4-(adamant-1-yl)phenyl}thiazoles 3a–d and the guanidyl derivative 3e, is shown in Scheme 4. (1-Phenyl)adamantane (18)4 was acylated under Friedel–Crafts reaction conditions36 to deliver the corresponding α-bromoketone 19, which via a Hantzsch condensation with the appropriate reagent, thiourea,37 thioamides 20,3821 (ref. 7) and guanylthiourea provided the desired thiazoles 3a–c and 3e, respectively. The dimethylthiazole 3d was prepared from the parent thiazole 3c, as shown before.
Scheme 4
Reagents and conditions: (a) BrCOCH2Br, AlCl3, DCM, –10 °C then r.t. 18 h, 57%; (b) appropriate thiobenzamide 20 (3b: 36%), 21 (3c: 85%), i-PrOH, autoclave, 120 °C 18 h or thiourea (3a: 88%), EtOH, reflux, 18 h; (c) MeONa, CH3COOH, HCHO 38% in H2O, NaBH3CN, MeOH, r.t. 18 h, 85%; (d) guanylthiourea, EtOH, reflux, 18 h, 89%.
The 1-adamantylcarbonylamides 4a, c and the (±)-10-camphorsulfonyl amides 4b, d were obtained upon coupling the commercially available 1-adamantylcarboxylic acid and (±)-10-camphorsulfonyl chloride with the 2-phenylthiazol-4-ethylamine (22)6 and the 4-phenylthiazol-2-ethylamine (23),7 respectively. The acid reacted in the presence of the coupling reagent HBTU, while the chlorides reacted without the aid of any activating reagent (Scheme 5).
The 27 new thiazole derivatives were tested for their activity against the bloodstream form Trypanosoma brucei and the results are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Screening of the new thiazole derivatives against T. brucei
Cmpd
T. brucei IC50a (μM)
T. brucei IC90a (μM)
L6 cells IC50a (μM)
S.I.b
1a
0.42 ± 0.01
0.56 ± 0.01
1.05 ± 0.23
2.5
1b
0.90 ± 0.01
1.10 ± 0.01
2.01 ± 0.32
2.2
1c
0.79 ± 0.02
1.03 ± 0.01
1.53 ± 0.09
1.9
1d
15.3 ± 0.2
18.1 ± 0.2
—
—
1e
>25
—
—
—
1f
>20
—
—
—
1g
>20
—
—
—
1h
>20
—
—
—
1i
>20
—
—
—
1j
10.7 ± 0.3
12.6 ± 0.2
<10.30
<1
2a
0.80 ± 0.03
1.17 ± 0.01
4.08 ± 0.15
5.1
2b
0.59 ± 0.02
0.79 ± 0.01
0.96 ± 0.26
1.6
2c
1.27 ± 0.07
1.60 ± 0.22
—
—
2d
>20
—
—
—
2e
>20
—
—
—
2f
∼10
—
—
—
2g
∼10
—
—
—
2h
>20
—
—
—
3a
22.5 ± 0.6
30.5 ± 4.5
13.8 ± 1.6
<1
3b
9.76 ± 0.77
12.8 ± 0.2
12.6 ± 0.9
<1
3c
2.74 ± 0.29
4.40 ± 0.07
4.16 ± 0.24
1.5
3d
1.41 ± 0.09
3.58 ± 0.05
3.19 ± 0.25
2.3
3e
∼10
—
—
—
4a
12.2 ± 0.8
18.7 ± 0.4
—
—
4b
20.6 ± 0.7
31.1 ± 0.3
—
—
4c
9.82 ± 0.22
13.1 ± 0.2
—
—
4d
23.8 ± 1.1
31.5 ± 0.6
—
—
IC50 and IC90; concentration that inhibits growth by 50% and 90%.
S.I.; selectivity index, the ratio of IC50 values obtained with L6 cells and T. brucei respectively.
IC50 and IC90; concentration that inhibits growth by 50% and 90%.S.I.; selectivity index, the ratio of IC50 values obtained with L6 cells and T. brucei respectively.It is apparent from the test results that the ethylamines 1a–c exhibit the highest activity among the new 2,4-disubstituted arylthiazoles. Bulkier substituents than the methyl group at the amino end have a negative impact on trypanocidal activity. Amido adducts (alkyl 1d and 1c, the aromatic 1f and 1g and the heteroaromatic 1h) and the ureido derivatives, 1i and 1j, have a non-significant activity. The same pattern is also observed in the 2 series, as compounds 2a–c are ca. 20 times more active than their acetamido congener 2d. Comparing series 1 and 2, it becomes apparent that the fluorine substitution has little positive effect on the activity. The dimethylamino isomeric thiazoles 2c and 3d present almost the same potency, while the nor-derivatives, the isomeric thiazoles 2a and 3c, show a substantial difference in potency. The 2-phenylthiazol-4-ethylamines 1a, c and 2a, c seem to be, in general, more potent than their isomeric 4-phenylthiazol-2-ethylamines 3c and 3d. The decrease of the length of the side chain does not enhance activity. Methanamine 3b bears two atoms (carbon and nitrogen) in its side chain and is twice as potent as the 2-aminothiazole 3a, which has only one nitrogen atom. The polar functionalization of the side chain did not improve the trypanocidal activity. The azido and cyano-tailored derivatives 2e and 2h are less potent, and the thiocyanate 2f, the ethanol 2g and the guanyl derivative 3e exhibit modest activity. The change in the relative position of the adamantane cage, the phenyl ring and the thiazole moiety, in adducts 4a and 4c, did not lead to activity enhancement. Last, the replacement of the adamantane skeleton by the camphorsulfonyl moiety in derivatives 4b and 4d has not led to antitrypanosomal enhancement. The 2,4-disubstituted arylthiazole adamantane derivatives, the ethylamines 1a–c and 2a–c, present a notable pharmacological profile, which merits further investigation in terms of activity and toxicity. These findings suggest that an aliphatic amine moiety at the side chain is mandatory to achieve notable trypanocidal activity. This amine group is positively charged at the cytosolic pH, which is not the case for all the other polar heads tested. The presence of this particular group might also enhance the cellular accumulation into the protozoa, as it is reported in the case of bacteria.39,40 Thus, the ethylamines 1a–c and 2a–c seem to exhibit promising trypanocidal properties, although further optimisation will be necessary to reduce their cytotoxicity and to develop a more drug-like profile.
Conclusions
In this work, we describe the synthesis of a new series of aromatic 2,4-disubstituted 1,3-thiazole analogues with trypanocidal potency. Among their congeners, the 2-phenylthiazol-4-ethylamines 1a–c and 2a–c presented the most significant trypanocidal activity against T. brucei. Analogues 1a and 2a exhibit antitrypanosomal activity in the range of IC50 = 0.42 μM and IC50 = 0.80 μM, respectively. Primary amine 2a is less potent than its congener 1a, but exhibits higher selectivity, which is a promising perspective for designing new trypanocidals in the future. Both of these classes of derivatives bear a lipophilic end, which consists of a 4-(1-adamantyl)phenyl or a 3-(1-adamantyl)phenyl moiety, a 1,3-thiazole ring and a functional end, which comprises of an alkylamine. The addition of the adamantane ring into the scaffold of the thiazole reference compounds6,7 has not improved their pharmacological profile, in terms of activity and toxicity. On the other hand, the new congeners exhibit promising trypanocidal properties that merit further investigation. These tailored-made structural modifications will be implemented in the future in the design of trypanocidal agents.
Experimental part
Biology
Cytotoxic activity against rat skeletal myoblast L6 cells
Cytotoxicity against mammalian cells was assessed using microtitre plates. Briefly, L6 cells (a rat skeletal muscle line) were seeded at 1 × 104 mL–1 in 200 μL of growth medium containing 7 different compound concentrations in a range previously established to encompass both the IC50 and IC90 values. The plates were incubated for 6 days at 37 °C and 20 μL Alamar Blue (Biosource UK Ltd) was then added to each well. After an additional 8 hours incubation, the fluorescence was determined using a FLUOstar Omega fluorescent plate reader (BMG Labtech). Inhibition of growth was calculated by comparison with control values and IC50 and IC90 values were determined in triplicate using linear regression analysis.
Trypanosoma brucei culturing and drug testing
Bloodstream form T. brucei (strain 427) were cultured at 37 °C in modified Iscove's medium. Trypanocidal activity was assessed by growing parasites in microtiter plates in the presence of various drug concentrations. Parasites were seeded at 0.25 × 105 mL–1 in 200 μL of growth medium containing 7 different compound concentrations in a range previously established to encompass both the IC50 and IC90 values. The plates were incubated for 48 hours at 37 °C and 20 μL Alamar Blue was then added to each well. After an additional overnight incubation, the fluorescence was determined. Inhibition of growth was calculated by comparison with control values and IC50 and IC90 values were determined in triplicate using linear regression analysis.
Synthetic procedures
All chemicals and solvents were obtained from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. Reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography. Melting points were determined on a Büchi 530 apparatus and are uncorrected. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer 833 spectrophotometer. 1H-NMR spectra recorded on a Bruker DRX 400 (400 MHz) spectrometer and 13C-NMR spectra were taken at 50 MHz on Bruker AC 200 (200 MHz) spectrometer and at 150 MHz on Bruker Avance 600 spectrometer (600 MHz). All NMR spectra were taken in deuterochloroform or hexadeuterodimethyl sulfoxide and the chemical shifts are reported in ppm. Elemental analyses (C, H, N) were carried out by the Institute of Chemical Biology, NHRF, Greece and the results obtained had a maximum deviation of ±0.4% from the theoretical value.
n-BuLi (4 mL,1.6 M in hexanes, 6.4 mmol) was added in one portion to a stirred solution of the bromide 5 (ref. 28) (1.25 g, 4.04 mmol) in anhydrous THF (20 mL), at –73 °C, under an argon atmosphere. The mixture was then stirred at –80 °C for 25 min prior to addition of (i-PrO)3B (3 mL, 12.1 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 35 min at the same temperature and subsequently at ambient temperature overnight. Next, dilute HCl (20 mL) was added dropwise at 0 °C, the mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature and then extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water, dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was crystallized from n-hexane to give compound 6 (1.1 g, 90%) as a white solid, which was used directly in the next step. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.18 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, 2-Har), 8.03 (dd, J = 8.4, 4.2 Hz, 1H, 6-Har), 7.12 (dd, J = 8.1, 7.8 Hz, 1H, 5-Har), 2.12 (bs, 3H, 3,5,7-Had), 2.06 (bs, 6H, 2,8,9-Had), 1.79 (br.s, 6H, 4,6,10-Had).
Ethyl chloroformate (0.1 mL, 1.01 mmol) and Et3N (0.15 mL) were added to a stirred solution of the amine 1a (180 mg, 0.51 mmol) in anhydrous THF (3 mL), at 0 °C, under an argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred for 5 min at 0 °C and then at ambient temperature, overnight. Next, water was added into the mixture, which was then extracted with EtOAc. The organic phase was washed with water dried over MgSO4 and the solvent evaporated. The resulting residue was used in the next step without further purification.A solution of the crude amide (220 mg, 0.51 mmol) in anhydrous THF (5 mL) was added dropwise to a stirred suspension of LiAlH4 (100 mg, 2.52 mmol) in anhydrous THF (5 mL), under an argon atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 25 min and then refluxed for 4 h. Next, the reaction mixture was cooled in an ice bath, and ethanol, water and a NaOH (10%) solution were sequentially added. The resulting suspension was then filtered, the filtrate was evaporated in vacuo and the resulting residue was treated with water and a HCl (5%) solution. The aqueous phase was then washed with Et2O and solid Na2CO3 was added until pH = 10. The aqueous phase was then extracted with DCM and the combined organic phase was dried over Na2CO3 and the solvent evaporated in vacuo to afford compound 1b, as a viscous oil (170 mg, 88% from compound 8). M.p. (dihydrochloride): 221–223 °C (EtOH/Et2O). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.26 (br.s, 1H, NHth), 7.97 (bs, 2H, NH2), 7.86–7.76 (m, 2H, 2,6-Har), 7.53 (s, 1H, 5-Hth), 7.24 (dd, J = 12.8, 8.3 Hz, 1H, 5-Har), 3.24 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 2H, NCH2), 3.17 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 2.57 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 3H, CH3), 2.07 (s, 3H, 3,5,7-Had), 2.02 (s, 6H, 2,8,9-Had), 1.74 (s, 6H, 4,6,10-Had). 13C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.5 (2-Cth), 162.7 (d, J = 251.7 Hz, 4-Car), 152.7 (4-Cth), 137.4 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 3-Car), 129.3 (1-Car), 126.0 (d, J = 10.2 Hz, 2-Car), 124.9 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 6-Car), 117.4 (d, J = 26.5 Hz, 5-Car), 116.1 (5-Cth), 47.2 (NCH2), 40.4 (2,8,9-Cad), 36.2 (4,6,10-Cad), 36.0 (1-Cad), 32.4 (CH3), 28.1 (3,5,7-Cad), 27.4 (CH2). Anal. calcd for C22H31FCl2N2S: C, 58.59; H, 6.59; N, 6.32 found C, 58.71; H, 6.25; N, 6.09.
A solution of MeONa (0.1 mL, 30% in MeOH, 0.52 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of compound 1a dihydrochloride (220 mg, 0.52 mmol) in MeOH (8 mL) and the resulting mixture was stirred for 10 min in ambient temperature. Then acetic acid (0.12 mL, 2 mmol) and NaCNBH3 (65 mg, 1.01 mmol) were added into the reaction mixture. Subsequently, a solution of aq. HCHO (38%, 0.1 mL, 1.20 mmol) dissolved in MeOH (2.5 mL) was added dropwise over the course of 30 min and the reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature, overnight. The solvent was removed in vacuo and an aqueous solution of NaOH (4N, 5 mL) was added. The resulting mixture was then extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL) and the combined organic phases were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4 and the solvent evaporated to afford compound 1c, as a yellow viscous oil (150 mg, 75% from compound 8). M.p. (dihydrochloride): 280–282 °C (EtOH/Et2O). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.89 (s, 1H, NHTh), 7.86–7.76 (m, 2H, 2,6-Har), 7.53 (s, 1H, 5-Hth), 7.25 (dd, J = 12.7, 8.2 Hz, 1H, 5-Har), 6.05 (s, 1H, NH), 3.52–3.36 (m, 2H, NCH2), 3.30–3.19 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.81 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 6H, CH3), 2.07 (s, 3H, 3,5,7-Had), 2.02 (s, 6H, 2,8,9-Had), 1.75 (s, 6H, 4,6,10-Had). 13C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.9 (2-Cth), 163.1 (d, J = 251.8 Hz, 4-Car), 153.0 (4-Cth), 137.9 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 3-Car), 129.8 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1-Car), 126.4 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 2-Car), 125.3 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 6-Car), 117.8 (d, J = 25.6 Hz, 5-Car), 116.6 (5-Cth), 55.8 (NCH2), 42.5 (CH3), 40.9 (2,8,9-Cad), 36.6 (4,6,10-Cad), 36.4 (1-Cad), 28.5 (3,5,7-Cad), 26.4 (CH2). Anal. calcd for C23H33FCl2N2S: C, 60.39; H, 6.83; N, 6.12 found C, 60.50; H, 6.91; N, 6.41.
General method for the preparation of amides 1d–g, i, j and 2d
A stirred solution of amine 1a or 2a (1 eq.) and Et3N (0.5 mL) in EtOAc (7 mL) was cooled to 0 °C and the appropriate acid chloride or anhydride (2–3 eq.) was added under an argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 24–48 h. Water was added into the mixture, which was then extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were washed with water, dried over Na2SO4, the solvent evaporated and the residue was purified by column chromatography.
Oxygen gas was bubbled into a stirred solution of 1-(4-tolyl)adamantane (11)33 (1.4 g, 6.17 mmol), Co(OAc)2 (73 mg, 0.31 mmol), Mn(OAc)2 (9 mg, 0.03 mmol) and NaBr (35 mg, 0.32 mmol) in AcOH (26 mL)/dioxane (2.8 mL)/H2O (0.7 mL) for 6 h, at 105 °C. The resulting mixture was cooled to ambient temperature and water was added into the mixture. The residue obtained was filtered and washed with water. The resulting solid was then dried in vacuo, in the presence of P2O5, overnight to afford compound 12, as a white solid (1.4 g, 89%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 12.30 (br.s, 1H, OH) 8.04 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, 3,5-Har), 7.46 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2,6-Har), 2.12 (s, 3H, 3,5,7-Had), 1.94 (s, 6H, 2,8,9-Had), 1.78 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H, 4,6,10-Had).
4-(1-Tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decyl)benzamide (13)
A solution of 4-(adamant-1-yl)benzoic acid (12) (2 g, 6.17 mmol) in SOCl2 (12 ml) was heated at 65 °C for 45 min. The excess of SOCl2 was removed under reduced pressure and subsequently by azeotropic distillation with benzene. The resulting precipitate was then dissolved in anhydrous THF (10 mL) and added to a stirred solution of NH3 (25%) in water (50 mL), dropwise, at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min at ambient temperature and extracted with EtOAc. The organic layer dried over MgSO4 and the solvent evaporated to afford compound 13 as an off white solid (1.9 g, 96%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.83 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 3,5-Har), 7.64 (br.s, 2H, NH2), 7.39 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2,6-Har), 2.11 (s, 3H, 3,5,7-Had), 1.90 (br.s, 6H, 2,8,9-Had), 1.77 (q, J = 12.2 Hz, 6H, 4,6,10-Had). Anal. calcd for C17H21NO: C, 79.96; H, 8.29 found C, 79.77; H, 8.57.
4-(1-Tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decyl)thiobenzamide (14)
Lawesson's reagent (1.2 g) was added to a stirred solution of benzamide 13 (1.5 g, 6.17 mmol) in dioxane (15 mL) and the reaction mixture was heated to 110 °C, overnight. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the crude residue was crystallised from DCM. The filtrate of the recrystallisation still contained benzamide 13, thus it was purified by column chromatography. Elution with DCM afforded compound 14 as a yellow solid (780 mg, 50%). M.p.: 201–202 °C 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.83 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 3,5-Har), 7.64 (br.s, 1H, NH), 7.39 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2,6-Har), 7.20 (s, 1H, NH), 2.11 (s, 3H, 3,5,7-Had), 1.90 (br.s, 6H, 2,8,9-Had), 1.77 (q, J = 12.2 Hz, 6H, 4,6,10-Had). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 202.6 (CS), 156.0 (1-Car), 136.4 (4-Car), 126.9 (2,6-Car), 125.1 (3,5-Car), 42.9 (2,8,9-Cad), 36.7 (4,6,10-Cad), 36.6 (1-Cad), 28.8 (3,5,7-Cad). C17H21NS: C, 75.23; H, 7.80 found C, 75.07; H, 7.99.
Phthalimide 10 was prepared in a similar way as for compound 8 using pinacolborane 9 (ref. 31) (300 mg, 0.88 mmol) and bromothiazole 7 (ref. 6) (250 mg, 0.73 mmol) as starting materials. Elution with 10–20% EtOAc in hexanes afforded compound 10 as a white solid (300 mg, 87%).
Method B
The bromoketone 15 (ref. 6) (200 mg, 0.66 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of the thiobenzamide 14 (180 mg, 0.66 mmol) in EtOH (4 mL) and the reaction mixture was refluxed overnight. The resulting suspension was filtered and the precipitate was washed with Et2O and dried over MgSO4 to afford compound 10, as a white solid (200 mg, 65%) M.p.: 213–214 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.81 (dt, J = 6.8, 3.4 Hz, 2H, 2′,5′-Har), 7.73 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, 2,6-Har), 7.66 (dt, J = 6.8, 3.4 Hz, 2H, 3′,4′-Har), 7.34 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, 3,5-Har), 6.94 (s, 1H, 5-Hth), 4.10 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, NCH2), 3.21 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH2), 2.12 (br.s, 3H, 3,5,7-Had), 1.91 (br.s, 6H, 2,8,9-Had), 1.78 (dd, J = 25.4, 12.1 Hz, 6H, 4,6,10-Had). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.4 (CO), 168.2 (2-Cth), 154.2 (4-Cth), 153.4 (1-Car), 133.9 (3′,4′-Car), 132.3 (1′,6′-Car), 131.1 (4-Car), 126.4 (2,6-Car), 125.4 (3,5-Car), 123.3 (2′,5′-Car), 114.2 (5-Cth), 43.1 (2,8,9-Cad), 37.7 (NCH2), 36.9 (4,6,10-Cad), 36.5 (1-Cad), 30.2 (CH2), 29.0 (3,5,7-Cad). C29H28N2O2S: C, 74.33; H, 6.02; N, 5.98 found C, 74.64; H, 6.12; N, 6.21.
Thiobenzamide 14 (200 mg, 0.74 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of 1-3-dichloroacetone (125 mg, 0.99 mmol) in acetone (4 mL) and the reaction mixture was refluxed overnight. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the resulting residue was dissolved in conc. H2SO4 (5 mL), stirred for 30 min and subsequently poured onto a mixture of water and ice. The resulting suspension was the filtered and the precipitate was washed with water to afford compound 15 as a yellow-white solid (190 mg, 75%), which was used in the next step without further purification.
A solution of the chloride 15 (180 mg, 0.52 mmol) and KCN (260 mg, 5.24 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (2 mL), was heated at 60 °C under an argon atmosphere for 36 h and then chilled to room temperature. Water was then added into the reaction mixture, which was extracted with EtOAc. The organic layer was washed with water and brine, dried over MgSO4, and then the solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The solid residue was then purified by column chromatography. Elution with 20% EtOAc in hexanes afforded compound 2e as a yellow crystalline solid (70 mg, 41%). M.p.: 159–160 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.86 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2,6H-ar), 7.44 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, 3,5-Har), 7.26 (s, 1H, 5-Hth), 3.95 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.12 (s, 3H, 3,5,7-Had), 1.93 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 6H, 2,8,9-Had), 1.79 (q, 6H, 4,6,10-Had). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.7 (2-Cth), 154.2 (1-Car), 145.6 (4-Cth), 130.4 (4-Car), 126.4 (2,6-Car), 125.6 (3,5-Car), 116.9 (CN), 115.6 (5-Cth), 43.0 (2,8,9-Cad), 36.7 (4,6,10-Cad), 36.5 (1-Cad), 28.9 (3,5,7-Cad), 20.7 (CH2). Anal. calcd for C21H22N2S: C, 75.41; H, 6.63; N, 8.38 found C, 74.34; H, 6.29; N, 8.51.
4-Chloroacetoacetate (700 mg, 2.43 mmol) was added to a stirred mixture of thiobenzamide 14 (1 g, 3.68 mmol) in i-PrOH (8 mL), and the reaction mixture was stirred overnight, at 110 °C, in an autoclave. The solvent was then removed in vacuo and the resulting residue was dissolved in EtOAc and washed with water, a saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 and brine. The organic layer was then dried over MgSO4 and the solvent evaporated under vacuum. The resulting oil was triturated with EtOAc/hexanes to afford compound 16 as a light orange solid (1.3 g, 92%) which was used in the next step without further purification.
To a stirred suspension of LiAlH4 (85 mg, 2.23 mmol) in anhydrous THF (5 mL), was added dropwise a solution of compound 16 (170 mg, 0.44 mmol) in anhydrous THF (3 mL), under an argon atmosphere and then the reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 2 h. Next, the mixture was cooled in an ice bath and ethanol, water and a NaOH (10%) solution were added in order. The resulting suspension was then filtered, the filtrate was evaporated in vacuo and extracted with DCM. The organic layer was then washed with water, dried over MgSO4 and the solvent evaporated to afford compound 2g as an off white solid (120 mg, 80%). M.p.: 93–94 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.86 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, 2,6H-ar), 7.42 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, 3,5-Har), 6.94 (s, 1H, 5-Hth), 3.99 (s, 2H, CH2OH), 3.68 (s, 1H, OH), 3.02 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H, CH2), 2.12 (s, 3H 3,5,7-Had), 1.95 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 6H, 2,8,9-Had), 1.83–1.73 (m, 6H, 4,6,10-Had). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.5 (2-Cth), 155.7 (4-Cth), 153.8 (1-Car), 130.7 (4-Car), 126.3 (2,6-Car), 125.5 (3,5-Car), 113.4 (5-Cth), 62.1 (CH2OH), 43.0 (2,8,9-Cad), 36.7 (4,6,10-Cad), 36.4 (1-Cad), 33.8 (CH2), 28.9 (3,5,7-Cad). Anal. calcd for C21H25NOS: C, 74.30; H, 7.42; N, 4.13 found C, 74.53; H, 7.31; N, 3.95.
To a stirred solution of the alcohol 2g (170 mg, 0.50 mmol) and Et3N (85 μL) in DCM (2 mL), MsCl (50 μL) was added dropwise at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature overnight. 1 M hydrochloride solution was added, into the reaction mixture, which was then extracted with EtOAc and the organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and the solvent evaporated to afford compound 17 as a yellow solid (170 mg, 95%), which used in the next step without further purification.
To a stirred solution of (1-phenyl)adamantane (18)35 (1.00 g, 4.71 mmol) and AlCl3 (700 mg, 5.10 mmol) in anhydrous DCM (10 mL) was added a solution of BrCOCH2Br (0.5 mL, 4.71 mmol) in anhydrous DCM (10 mL) under an argon atmosphere, at –10 °C. The reaction mixture was then heated to room temperature and stirred under an argon atmosphere overnight. Then the reaction mixture was poured onto ice-water, extracted with DCM and the organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and the solvent evaporated under vacuum. The resulting crude residue was purified by gradient column chromatography. Elution with EtOAc 3–5% in hexanes afforded compound 19 as a white solid (900 mg, 57%). M.p.: 94–96 °C (EtOAc/Hex). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.94 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, 2,6-Har), 7.48 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, 3,5-Har), 4.45 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.12 (s, 3H, 3,5,7-Had), 1.92 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 6H, 2,8,9-Had), 1.83–1.75 (br.s, 6H, 4,6,8-Had). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.0 (CO), 158.0 (1-Car), 129.0 (2,6-Cad), 127.5 (4-Cad), 125.6 (3,5-Car), 42.9 (2,8,9-Cad), 36.9 (1-Cad), 36.8 (3,6,10-Cad), 31.1 (CH2), 28.8 (3,5,7-Cad). Anal. calcd for C18H21BrO: C, 64.87; H, 6.35 found C, 64.63; H, 6.46.
A solution of 1-adamantylcarbonyl chloride (450 mg, 2.26 mmol) in anhydrous THF (8 mL) was added dropwise, at 0 °C onto a stirred solution of the 2-phenylthiazol-4-ethylamine (22)6 (308 mg, 1.51 mmol) and Et3N (0.45 mL, 3.23 mmol) in THF (8 mL) and the reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature under an argon atmosphere overnight. The mixture was extracted with DCM and the organic phase was then washed with water, dried over MgSO4 and the solvent evaporated under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was purified with column chromatography. Elution with 50% EtOAc in hexanes afforded compound 4a as a white solid (270 mg, 49%). M.p.: 135–136 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.99–7.91 (m, 2H, 2,6-Har), 7.46–7.38 (m, 3H, 3,4,5-Har), 6.96 (s, 1H, 5-Cth), 6.86 (br.s, 1H, NH), 3.60 (dd, J = 12.0, 5.6 Hz, 2H, CH2NH), 2.91 (t, J = 9,51 Hz 2H, CH2), 2.05 (br.s, 3H, 3,5,7-Had), 1.88 (s, 6H, 2,8,9-Had), 1.70 (q, J = 12.1 Hz, 6H 4,6,10-Had). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.88 (CO), 168.2 (2-Cth), 155.9 (4-Cth), 133.5 (1-Car), 130.0 (4-Car), 128.8 (2,6-Car), 126.3 (3,5-Car), 114.2 (5-Cth), 40.5 (CH2N), 39.3 (2,8,9-Cad), 38.8 (1-Cad), 36.5 (4,6–10-Cad), 30.7 (CH2), 28.1 (3,5,7-Cad). Anal. calcd for C22H26N2OS: C, 72.08; H, 7.15; N, 7.64 found C, 72.31; H, 7.09; N, 7.88.
To a stirred solution of the 4-phenylthiazol-2-ethylamine hydrobromide (23)7 (300 mg, 1.05 mmol) in DMF/DCM 1 : 1 (10 mL), was added 1-adamantanecarboxylic acid (227 mg, 1.26 mmol), HBTU (478 mg, 1.26 mmol), and DIPEA (474 mg, 3.68 mmol) and the reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature under an argon atmosphere, overnight. The mixture was then partitioned between DCM and an aqueous solution of citric acid (10%) and the aqueous phase was extracted with DCM. The combined organic phase was then washed with water and brine, dried over MgSO4 and the solvent evaporated under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was purified with gradient column chromatography. Elution with 10% to 50% EtOAc in hexanes afforded compound 4a as a white solid (330 mg, 94%). M.p.: 107–108 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.01–7.84 (m, 2H, 2,6-Har), 7.54–7.28 (m, 3,4,5-Har, 5-Hth), 6.92 (s, 1H, NH), 3.69 (dd, J = 11.8, 5.7 Hz, 3H, CH2N), 3.20 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H, CH2), 2.02 (s, 3H, 3,5,7-Had), 1.87 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 6H, 2,8,9-Had), 1.70 (q, J = 12.2 Hz, 6H, 4,6,10-Had).13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.9 (CO), 168.2 (2-Cth), 155.9 (4-Cth), 133.5 (1-Car), 130.0 (4-Car), 128.8 (2,6-Car), 126.3 (3,5-Car), 114.2 (5-Cth), 40.5 (CH2N), 39.3 (2,8,9-Cad), 38.8 (1-Cad), 36.5 (4,6–10-Cad), 30.7 (CH2), 28.1 (3,5,7-Cad). Anal. calcd for C22H26N2OS: C, 72.09; H, 7.15; N, 7.64 found C, 72.27; H, 7.23; N, 7.92.
Authors: Shane M Devine; Mark D Mulcair; Cael O Debono; Eleanor W W Leung; J Willem M Nissink; San Sui Lim; Indu R Chandrashekaran; Mansha Vazirani; Biswaranjan Mohanty; Jamie S Simpson; Jonathan B Baell; Peter J Scammells; Raymond S Norton; Martin J Scanlon Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Markos-Orestis Georgiadis; Violeta Kourbeli; Vaya Ioannidou; Evangelos Karakitsios; Ioannis Papanastasiou; Andrew Tsotinis; Dimitri Komiotis; Anthony Vocat; Stewart T Cole; Martin C Taylor; John M Kelly Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2019-04-06 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Angeliki-Sofia Foscolos; Ioannis Papanastasiou; Andrew Tsotinis; Martin C Taylor; John M Kelly Journal: ChemMedChem Date: 2019-05-27 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Stephanie Russell; Raphaël Rahmani; Amy J Jones; Harriet L Newson; Kevin Neilde; Ignacio Cotillo; Marzieh Rahmani Khajouei; Lori Ferrins; Sana Qureishi; Nghi Nguyen; Maria S Martinez-Martinez; Donald F Weaver; Marcel Kaiser; Jennifer Riley; John Thomas; Manu De Rycker; Kevin D Read; Gavin R Flematti; Eileen Ryan; Scott Tanghe; Ana Rodriguez; Susan A Charman; Albane Kessler; Vicky M Avery; Jonathan B Baell; Matthew J Piggott Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 7.446