Literature DB >> 22403167

Femoral antetorsion: comparing asymptomatic volunteers and patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

Reto Sutter1, Tobias J Dietrich, Patrick O Zingg, Christian W A Pfirrmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the range of femoral antetorsion with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in asymptomatic volunteers and patients with different subtypes of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) because abnormal femoral antetorsion might be a contributing factor in the development of FAI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was institutional review board approved; all individuals provided signed informed consent. Sixty-three asymptomatic volunteers and 63 patients with symptomatic FAI between age 20 and 50 years were matched for age and sex. They underwent standard MR imaging with two additional rapid transverse sequences over the proximal and distal femur for antetorsion measurement. Twenty volunteers underwent a second MR imaging examination in the same leg. Two readers independently measured femoral antetorsion. The time for the additional sequences was tabulated. Interobserver agreement was calculated; differences in antetorsion were assessed by using analysis of variance and the unpaired t test.
RESULTS: Femoral antetorsion can be assessed with MR imaging in about 80 seconds, with high interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.967) and high agreement between different MR examinations (ICC = 0.966). Women had a significantly larger antetorsion than men (P < .001 for both readers), and antetorsion of the left femur was significantly larger than that of the right femur (P = .01 for reader 1, P = .02 for reader 2). Overall, antetorsion was similar in volunteers and in patients for reader 1 (12.7° ± 10.0 [standard deviation] vs 12.6° ± 9.8, respectively; P = .9) and reader 2 (12.8° ± 10.1 vs 13.5° ± 9.8, respectively; P = .7). Femoral antetorsion was significantly higher in patients with pincer-type FAI than in those with cam-type FAI for reader 1 (18.3° ± 9.8 vs 10.0° ± 9.1, P = .02) and reader 2 (18.7° ± 10.5 vs 11.6° ± 8.8, P = .04).
CONCLUSION: Femoral antetorsion can be measured rapidly and with good reproducibility with MR imaging. Patients with pincer-type FAI had a significantly larger femoral antetorsion than patients with cam-type FAI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22403167     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  39 in total

Review 1.  MRI of the hip for the evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement; past, present, and future.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Riley; Emily J McWalter; Kathryn J Stevens; Marc R Safran; Riccardo Lattanzi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Differences in Femoral Torsion Among Various Measurement Methods Increase in Hips With Excessive Femoral Torsion.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Till D Lerch; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Simon D Steppacher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Predicting the optimal entry point for femoral antegrade nailing using a new measurement approach.

Authors:  Jing-xin Zhao; Xiu-yun Su; Zhe Zhao; Li-cheng Zhang; Zhi Mao; Hao Zhang; Li-hai Zhang; Pei-fu Tang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  The Lisbon Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement imaging-part 2: general issues, parameters, and reporting.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Miguel O Castro; P Diana Afonso; Paulo Rego; Michael Dienst; Reto Sutter; Florian Schmaranzer; Luca Sconfienza; Ara Kassarjian; Olufemi R Ayeni; Paul E Beaulé; Pedro Dantas; Radhesh Lalam; Marc-André Weber; Filip M Vanhoenacker; Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Lennart Jans; Philip Robinson; Apostolos H Karantanas; Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska; Suzanne Anderson; Iris Noebauer-Huhmann; Oliver Marin-Peña; Diego Collado; Marc Tey-Pons; Ehrenfried Schmaranzer; Mario Padron; Josef Kramer; Patrick O Zingg; Michel De Maeseneer; Eva Llopis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  [Impingement of the hip].

Authors:  F Schmaranzer; M Hanke; T Lerch; S Steppacher; K Siebenrock; M Tannast
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  MRI of lower extremity impingement and friction syndromes in children.

Authors:  Üstün Aydıngöz; Zeynep Maraş Özdemir; Altan Güneş; Fatma Bilge Ergen
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.630

7.  FAI morphology increases the risk for osteoarthritis in young people with a minimum follow-up of 25 years.

Authors:  Armando Hoch; Pascal Schenk; Thorsten Jentzsch; Stefan Rahm; Patrick O Zingg
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 8.  [Femoroacetabular impingement - Update 2019].

Authors:  Andreas Heuck; Michael Dienst; Christian Glaser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Cam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Augusto Gaspar; Francisco Soldado; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  [Surgical therapy of ischiofemoral impingement by lateralizing intertrochanteric osteotomy].

Authors:  C Suren; R Burgkart; I J Banke; G Hertel; J Schauwecker; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.