BACKGROUND: Elucidation of immune populations with single-cell RNA-seq has greatly benefited the field of immunology by deepening the characterization of immune heterogeneity and leading to the discovery of new subtypes. However, single-cell methods inherently suffer from limitations in the recovery of complete transcriptomes due to the prevalence of cellular and transcriptional dropout events. This issue is often compounded by limited sample availability and limited prior knowledge of heterogeneity, which can confound data interpretation. RESULTS: Here, we systematically benchmarked seven high-throughput single-cell RNA-seq methods. We prepared 21 libraries under identical conditions of a defined mixture of two human and two murine lymphocyte cell lines, simulating heterogeneity across immune-cell types and cell sizes. We evaluated methods by their cell recovery rate, library efficiency, sensitivity, and ability to recover expression signatures for each cell type. We observed higher mRNA detection sensitivity with the 10x Genomics 5' v1 and 3' v3 methods. We demonstrate that these methods have fewer dropout events, which facilitates the identification of differentially-expressed genes and improves the concordance of single-cell profiles to immune bulk RNA-seq signatures. CONCLUSION: Overall, our characterization of immune cell mixtures provides useful metrics, which can guide selection of a high-throughput single-cell RNA-seq method for profiling more complex immune-cell heterogeneity usually found in vivo.
BACKGROUND: Elucidation of immune populations with single-cell RNA-seq has greatly benefited the field of immunology by deepening the characterization of immune heterogeneity and leading to the discovery of new subtypes. However, single-cell methods inherently suffer from limitations in the recovery of complete transcriptomes due to the prevalence of cellular and transcriptional dropout events. This issue is often compounded by limited sample availability and limited prior knowledge of heterogeneity, which can confound data interpretation. RESULTS: Here, we systematically benchmarked seven high-throughput single-cell RNA-seq methods. We prepared 21 libraries under identical conditions of a defined mixture of two human and two murine lymphocyte cell lines, simulating heterogeneity across immune-cell types and cell sizes. We evaluated methods by their cell recovery rate, library efficiency, sensitivity, and ability to recover expression signatures for each cell type. We observed higher mRNA detection sensitivity with the 10x Genomics 5' v1 and 3' v3 methods. We demonstrate that these methods have fewer dropout events, which facilitates the identification of differentially-expressed genes and improves the concordance of single-cell profiles to immune bulk RNA-seq signatures. CONCLUSION: Overall, our characterization of immune cell mixtures provides useful metrics, which can guide selection of a high-throughput single-cell RNA-seq method for profiling more complex immune-cell heterogeneity usually found in vivo.
Entities:
Keywords:
High throughput sequencing; Immune-cell profiling; Single cell; Single-cell RNA-seq; Transcriptomics
Authors: Alexander Dobin; Carrie A Davis; Felix Schlesinger; Jorg Drenkow; Chris Zaleski; Sonali Jha; Philippe Batut; Mark Chaisson; Thomas R Gingeras Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Rapolas Zilionis; Camilla Engblom; Christina Pfirschke; Virginia Savova; David Zemmour; Hatice D Saatcioglu; Indira Krishnan; Giorgia Maroni; Claire V Meyerovitz; Clara M Kerwin; Sun Choi; William G Richards; Assunta De Rienzo; Daniel G Tenen; Raphael Bueno; Elena Levantini; Mikael J Pittet; Allon M Klein Journal: Immunity Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Dmitry R Bandura; Vladimir I Baranov; Olga I Ornatsky; Alexei Antonov; Robert Kinach; Xudong Lou; Serguei Pavlov; Sergey Vorobiev; John E Dick; Scott D Tanner Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2009-08-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: W Miachel Hanson; Zhe Chen; Laurie K Jackson; Meriem Attaf; Andrew K Sewell; Jennifer M Heemstra; John D Phillips Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Thomas V Rousselle; Jennifer M McDaniels; Amol C Shetty; Elissa Bardhi; Daniel G Maluf; Valeria R Mas Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Bradley W Abramson; Mark Novotny; Nolan T Hartwick; Kelly Colt; Brian D Aevermann; Richard H Scheuermann; Todd P Michael Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 8.340