Binbin Chen1, Nicolas Gauquelin2, Robert J Green3,4, Jin Hong Lee5, Cinthia Piamonteze6, Matjaž Spreitzer7, Daen Jannis2, Johan Verbeeck2, Manuel Bibes5, Mark Huijben1, Guus Rijnders1, Gertjan Koster1. 1. MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands. 2. Electron Microscopy for Materials Science (EMAT), University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium. 3. Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan, 116 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2, Canada. 4. Stewart Blusson Quantum Matter Institute, University of British Columbia, 111-2355 E Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada. 5. Unité Mixte de Physique, CNRS, Thales, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91767 Palaiseau, France. 6. Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, PSI, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland. 7. Advanced Materials Department, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Abstract
The properties of correlated oxides can be manipulated by forming short-period superlattices since the layer thicknesses are comparable with the typical length scales of the involved correlations and interface effects. Herein, we studied the metal-insulator transitions (MITs) in tetragonal NdNiO3/SrTiO3 superlattices by controlling the NdNiO3 layer thickness, n in the unit cell, spanning the length scale of the interfacial octahedral coupling. Scanning transmission electron microscopy reveals a crossover from a modulated octahedral superstructure at n = 8 to a uniform nontilt pattern at n = 4, accompanied by a drastically weakened insulating ground state. Upon further reducing n the predominant dimensionality effect continuously raises the MIT temperature, while leaving the antiferromagnetic transition temperature unaltered down to n = 2. Remarkably, the MIT can be enhanced by imposing a sufficiently large strain even with strongly suppressed octahedral rotations. Our results demonstrate the relevance for the control of oxide functionalities at reduced dimensions.
The properties of correlated oxides can be manipulated by forming short-period superlattices since the layer thicknesses are comparable with the typical length scales of the involved correlations and interface effects. Herein, we studied the metal-insulator transitions (MITs) in tetragonal NdNiO3/SrTiO3 superlattices by controlling the NdNiO3 layer thickness, n in the unit cell, spanning the length scale of the interfacial octahedral coupling. Scanning transmission electron microscopy reveals a crossover from a modulated octahedral superstructure at n = 8 to a uniform nontilt pattern at n = 4, accompanied by a drastically weakened insulating ground state. Upon further reducing n the predominant dimensionality effect continuously raises the MIT temperature, while leaving the antiferromagnetic transition temperature unaltered down to n = 2. Remarkably, the MIT can be enhanced by imposing a sufficiently large strain even with strongly suppressed octahedral rotations. Our results demonstrate the relevance for the control of oxide functionalities at reduced dimensions.
The ubiquitous electron–lattice
coupling in perovskite oxides enables us to tune their functionalities
by virtue of structural engineering.[1−10] In addition to the well-established strain approach, engineering
of the oxygen octahedral rotations (OOR) has been recognized as another
effective tool since both the electronic bandwidth and magnetic exchange
interaction in oxides are sensitive to the changes of the M–O–M
(M, transition metal ion) bond angle.[3−10] At the interface between two perovskites, the corner-shared octahedral
network has to rearrange to maintain the connectivity, known as the
octahedral proximity effect.[3] Such an effect
is usually confined within several unit cells (uc) and rapidly decays
away from the interface,[3−10] in contrast to the long-range effect up to tens of nanometers for
strain engineering.[1,2] By forming short-period superlattices
(SLs), the interfacial OOR coupling can be extended throughout the
entire film, thus creating novel structural phases with distinct properties
from the individual components.[7,11,12] Importantly, the OOR can be manipulated in SLs by designing the
relative thickness ratio of the component layers or selectively utilizing
a tilt-control layer, offering extra tuning “knobs”.[7,9,12] However, when the layer thickness
is reduced down to a few uc in SLs, a dimensional effect comes into
play and usually reduces the bandwidth.[13−19] The competition between the OOR and dimensional effects remains
rarely explored[20,21] but is crucial for the rational
control over oxide functionalities at the atomic scale.Rare-earth
nickelatesRNiO3 have received continuous
attention not only because of their puzzling physics but also for
the potential to design “Mottronics” devices.[22,23] Except for R = La, RNiO3 displays a sharp metal–insulator
transition (MIT) which can be systematically tuned by changing rare-earth
cations. Concurrent with the MIT, a structural transition from orthorhombic
(Pbnm) to monoclinic (P21/c) symmetry occurs due to the breathing distortions
of the NiO6 octahedra. This MIT is accompanied by a paramagnetic
to antiferromagnetic transition for R = Pr andNd, although the transitions
are well separated for the smaller rare-earth ions. The mechanism
for this temperature-driven MIT has been a long-standing debate.[24−30] Recently, resonant inelastic X-ray scattering spectroscopy revealed
a negative charge transfer energy andoxygen ligand holes (L) in NdNiO3 (NNO),[31] supporting a theoretically predicted bond disproportionation scenario.[25] The ground state is then described as alternatively
arranged Ni 3d8 and Ni 3d8L2 sites, which are associated with the breathing mode
of the NiO6 octahedra.[30] The
two inequivalent Ni–O bonds can also account for the peculiar
antiferromagnetic order at low temperatures.[22] More recently, the intimate competition between the two main structural
distortions in RNiO3, namely, the breathing mode and the
OOR, has been unveiled by first-principles calculations, where a certain
magnitude of OOR can trigger the breathing mode and induce the MIT.[29]RNiO3 at reduced dimensions
is of interest as a planar
orbital order, similar to high-temperature superconducting cuprates,
has been predicted.[32,33] Aside from the orbital control,
an emergent antiferromagnetic order, competing electronic phases,
and enhanced charge-order propensity have been reported in artificially
confined RNiO3 heterostructures.[13,15,34,35] Herein, the
combined effects of the OOR and spatial confinement on the MIT were
studied in NNO/SrTiO3 (STO) SLs via digitally varying the
NNO layer thickness, n in the uc. We observed a nonmonotonic
variation of the MIT temperature (TMIT) as a function of n because of the competition
between the OOR and dimensional crossover. On the other hand, the
antiferromagnetic transition temperature (TN) is found to be mainly controlled by the Ni–O–Ni bond
angle and Ni–O bond length but insensitive to the dimensional
reduction. The distinct response of the MIT and the antiferromagnetic
transition to dimensionality offers great opportunities to engineer
novel phases in nickelate SLs.The NNO/STO SLs, n/4, were fabricated on (001)pc-oriented (pc, pseudocubic)
NdGaO3 (NGO) substrates
by means of pulsed laser deposition monitored with reflection high-energy
electron diffraction (RHEED) (Figure S1). We set the STO layer thickness to 4 uc and the repetition number
of the NNO/STO bilayer to 10. Bulk NNO is orthorhombic at room temperature
showing an OOR pattern of a+b–b– in Glazer
notation (Figure a).
Hereafter, we use the pseudocubic indices for NNO and NGO, with a, b, and c corresponding
to the [001], [11̅0], and [110] axes of the orthorhombic lattice.
According to first-principles calculations, the combination of out-of-phase
and in-phase rotations can drive antipolar displacements of the A-site
cations to optimize the oxygen coordination,[36] as visualized from the projection along the b axis
of NNO. In this work, we used the A-site displacements as a relative
measure of the OOR considering the high accuracy in determining Nd3+ positions from scanning transmission electron microscopy
(STEM).[7,9,37] Unlike orthorhombic
NNO, STO is cubic without any OOR and A-site displacements (Figure b). The symmetry
mismatch at the heterointerface is expected to alter the OOR in the
near-interface region of NNO and tune its properties.[3,5]Figure c shows the
high-resolution θ–2θ X-ray diffraction (XRD) scans
around the NGO(002)pc peak for SLs with varied n. The presence of satellite peaks and thickness fringes
for all SLs attests to their abrupt interfaces and smooth surfaces.
Atomic force microscopy further confirms the terraced surface (Figure S2). As n reduces, the
main peak gradually shifts to lower angles because of the increasing
contribution from the compressively strained STO layer. Reciprocal
space mappings (Figure d,e) reveal a change in crystal symmetry from orthorhombic in the
NNO single film to tetragonal in the 8/4 SL. An analogous structural
change has also been reported in SrRuO3 films grown on
STO when scaling down the thickness below a critical value.[38] The tetragonal phase is ascribed to the suppressed
OOR along the in-plane axes as evidenced by STEM and half-order XRD
measurements.[5,38,39] For the SLs with smaller n, the RSMs show the same
features as the 8/4 SL (Figure S3). Given
the fact that XRD measurements provide spatially averaged structural
information over the samples, we performed atomically resolved STEM
measurements to reveal more delicate changes of the OOR within the
NNO/STO SLs.
Figure 1
Structural characterization of NNO/STO SLs. Schematic
lattice structure
of NNO (a) and STO (b). The royal blue and dark cyan octahedra and
yellow, wine, and magenta spheres represent NiO6, TiO6, Nd, Sr, and O, respectively. (c) High-resolution XRD θ–2θ
scans around the NGO(002)pc peak for the NNO/STO SLs with
varied n. RSMs around pseudocubic (013), (103), (01̅3),
and (1̅03) reflections measured from the 25-uc NNO single film
(d) and the 8/4 SL (e). The schematic insets show the shear distortion
of the pseudocubic lattice.
Structural characterization of NNO/STO SLs. Schematic
lattice structure
of NNO (a) andSTO (b). The royal blue and dark cyan octahedra and
yellow, wine, and magenta spheres represent NiO6, TiO6, Nd, Sr, and O, respectively. (c) High-resolution XRD θ–2θ
scans around the NGO(002)pc peak for the NNO/STO SLs with
varied n. RSMs around pseudocubic (013), (103), (01̅3),
and (1̅03) reflections measured from the 25-uc NNO single film
(d) and the 8/4 SL (e). The schematic insets show the shear distortion
of the pseudocubic lattice.Figure a,b shows
the high-angle annular dark field (HAADF)-STEM images of the 8/4 and
4/4 SLs, respectively. Due to the large difference in atomic numbers
between the Sr and the Nd atoms, the NNO andSTO layers can be readily
identified from the Z-contrast images as well as the electron energy
loss spectroscopy (EELS) color maps (Figure S4). Figure c,d shows
the enlarged images of the NNO layer in the corresponding SLs to highlight
the displacements of Nd3+. We define θ as the deviation
of the angle between three successive Nd3+ cations along
the a axis from 180°. Note that θ scales
with the OOR.[7,9,37] We
find that the 8/4 SL shows pronounced antipolar displacements of Nd3+, which becomes negligible in the 4/4 SL. The quantified
measure of θ is carried out along the growth direction as summarized
in Figure e. A clear
modulation of θ is observed in the 8/4 SL. The noninterfacial
region of NNO shows a maximum θ of ∼4.0 ± 0.5°
which decays in the vicinity of the interface. For the 4/4 SL, we
observe a uniform θ of ∼0.5° throughout the SL.
Therefore, the coherence length of the interfacial OOR coupling is
around ∼2 uc on the NNO side, which is comparable to those
of the SrIrO3/STO and La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/STO interfaces.[21,40]Figure f,g shows the cross-sectional mapping of
θ. The modulated θ in the 8/4 SL is in sharp contrast
with the nearly homogeneous distribution of θ in the 4/4 SL.
The almost quenched A-site antipolar displacement indicates a0a0c– for the 4/4 SL.[41] This
means the OOR along the in-plane axes is further quenched by reducing
the NNO layer thickness.
Figure 2
STEM characterization of OOR in NNO/STO SLs.
STEM-HAADF images
of NNO/STO SLs with n = 8 (a) and n = 4 (b). Scale bar, 2 nm. The corresponding enlarged images are
shown in (c) and (d) to highlight the A-site antipolar displacements.
The deviation angle θ is defined as described in the main text.
(e) Layer-resolved deviation angle θ. Cross-sectional
mapping of θ in the SLs with n = 8 (f) and n = 4 (g).
STEM characterization of OOR in NNO/STO SLs.
STEM-HAADF images
of NNO/STO SLs with n = 8 (a) andn = 4 (b). Scale bar, 2 nm. The corresponding enlarged images are
shown in (c) and (d) to highlight the A-site antipolar displacements.
The deviation angle θ is defined as described in the main text.
(e) Layer-resolved deviation angle θ. Cross-sectional
mapping of θ in the SLs with n = 8 (f) andn = 4 (g).The modifications to
the structural ordering within the NNO/STO
SLs are expected to cause significant variations to the transport
properties. Figure a shows the temperature dependent resistivity curves of the NNO/STO
SLs as well as a 25-uc thick NNO film for reference. The resistivities
at 300 K [ρ(300 K)] and 10 K [ρ(10 K)] are plotted against n in Figure b. At first glance, as n is reduced, ρ(300
K) gradually increases whereas ρ(10 K) shows a nonmonotonic
variation. As we will discuss below, the monotonic increase of ρ(300
K) is related to the reduced dimensions as well as the increasing
disorders, while the complex evolution of ρ(10 K) is due to
the competition between the OOR and the dimensionality effect. The
NNO film undergoes a sharp MIT as the temperature decreases below
176 K, which is 24 K lower than the bulk value (∼200 K) because
of the tensile strain.[2,22,42] The resistivity shows a change of 4 orders of magnitude across the
MIT, indicative of the high crystallinity and optimal oxygenstoichiometry
of the film.[42,43] In the 8/4 SL TMIT drastically decreases to 128 K. Also, the low-temperature
insulating state is suppressed as manifested by the sharp decline
of ρ(10 K) shown in Figure b. This is related to the suppression of orthorhombic
distortions as evidenced by the RSM results in Figure d,e. The suppressed OOR along the in-plane
axes stretches the Ni–O–Ni bond and boosts the bandwidth
as revealed by X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS).[9,10] Note
that the transition hysteresis is similar to the NNO single film,
which implies that the percolation behavior across the MIT is not
interrupted in the n = 8 SL.[22] However, the thermal hysteresis is markedly weakened upon reducing n from 8 to 6 uc. Meanwhile, the TMIT gradually increases from 128 to 162 K accompanied by a
rise of ρ(10 K). This is ascribed to the dimensionality effect
which stabilizes the insulating phase by blocking the interlayer electron
hopping.[14−17] As a result, the region with coexisting metallic and insulating
phases gradually vanishes.[17] Most strikingly,
as n is further reduced, we observe an unexpected
decline of TMIT from 162 K at 6 uc to
142 K at 5 uc, concurrent with a sudden drop of ρ(10 K). The
result is somewhat counterintuitive since the dimensionality effects
are expected to raise the TMIT continuously
by promoting the insulating state.[17] We
suggest the delicate changes of OOR in the SLs to be responsible for
this anomaly. As n is reduced below a critical thickness
(∼6 uc), the OOR of the SLs changes to a0a0c– by quenching the in-plane OOR given the limited coherence length
of the interfacial OOR coupling.[3,21,40] The quenched in-plane octahedral tilting can suppress the breathing
mode instabilities in NNO and then weaken the MIT.[29] Upon decreasing n below 5 uc, the OOR
of the SLs should be virtually unchanged, and the dominated dimensionality
effects dramatically increase the TMIT (Figure c). To gain
further insights into the thickness-dependent MIT, we fit the metallic
resistivity of the SLs with n ≥ 3 using the
power law ρ = ρ0 + ATα, where the parameter A is determined
by the strength of the electron scattering.[44] The power-law exponent α is found to increase from α
= 1.0 ± 0.1 for n ≥ 5 to α = 1.90
± 0.01 for n = 4 and end up with α = 3.14
± 0.01 for n = 3 (Figure S5). The departure from a linear scaling in perovskite nickelates
has been ascribed to a joint effect of epitaxial strain andoxygen
vacancies.[44] Considering the fact that
all SLs are coherently strained to the NGO substrate, the larger α
for n = 3, 4 is probably due to the increasing amounts
of oxygen vacancies with ultrathin NNO layers. This can also contribute
to the enhanced resistivity and TMIT by
creating local disproportionation of NiO6 octahedra.[45] The n = 2 SL exhibits insulating
behavior in the entire temperature range measured. The temperature
dependent resistivity curve can be well fitted with the two-dimensional
variable range hopping conduction model (Figure S6), attesting to the dimensional crossover.[35] Note that the effect of disorder should not play a dominant
role in the low-temperature insulating states for the SLs with n > 2. Otherwise we would have seen a monotonic increase
of ρ(10 K) with reducing n.
Figure 3
Thickness-dependent MITs
in NNO/STO SLs. (a) Temperature dependent
resistivity (ρ–T) curves
of NNO/STO SLs with varied n, along with a 25-uc-thick
NNO single film for comparison. (b) Resistivities at 300 and 10 K
as a function of n. (c) d(ln ρ)/[d ln(1/T)] vs T plots for the SLs with n = 2, 3, 4, and 5. TMIT and TN, marked by the arrow and triangle, are defined
as the temperature of the upturn in the ρ–T curve and the peak in the d(ln ρ)/[d ln(1/T)] vs T plot during the cooling process.
(d) Temperature dependent integrated intensity of the q = (1/4, 1/4, 1/4)pc reflection measured for SLs with n = 2 and 4 using RMD. The linear fitting is used to extract
the onset temperature of the antiferromagnetic order. The inset shows
the isothermal rocking curves around the q = (1/4,
1/4, 1/4)pc reflection taken from the SL with n = 4. The measurements were performed from 30 to 85 K with a step
of 5 K. (e) Phase diagram of NNO/STO SLs as a function of n. Here TN is derived from the
resistivity measurements.
Thickness-dependent MITs
in NNO/STO SLs. (a) Temperature dependent
resistivity (ρ–T) curves
of NNO/STO SLs with varied n, along with a 25-uc-thick
NNO single film for comparison. (b) Resistivities at 300 and 10 K
as a function of n. (c) d(ln ρ)/[d ln(1/T)] vs T plots for the SLs with n = 2, 3, 4, and 5. TMIT andTN, marked by the arrow and triangle, are defined
as the temperature of the upturn in the ρ–T curve and the peak in the d(ln ρ)/[d ln(1/T)] vs T plot during the cooling process.
(d) Temperature dependent integrated intensity of the q = (1/4, 1/4, 1/4)pc reflection measured for SLs with n = 2 and 4 using RMD. The linear fitting is used to extract
the onset temperature of the antiferromagnetic order. The inset shows
the isothermal rocking curves around the q = (1/4,
1/4, 1/4)pc reflection taken from the SL with n = 4. The measurements were performed from 30 to 85 K with a step
of 5 K. (e) Phase diagram of NNO/STO SLs as a function of n. Here TN is derived from the
resistivity measurements.The altered OOR should also have a profound impact on the antiferromagnetic
transitions of the SLs. Here, the peak position of the d(ln ρ)/[d
ln(1/T)] vs T plot has been used
to track TN in RNiO3.[2,46] As shown in Figure e, TN nearly coincides with TMIT for the NNO single film, while they are well separated
for all SLs. The decoupling of MIT andspin ordering has also been
reported for other RNiO3-based heterostructures and SLs
with different boundary conditions.[2,9,47,48] The suppressed OOR
along in-plane axes leads to a decrease of TN from ∼168 K for the 25-uc NNO film to ∼82 K
for the n = 8 SL, following the trend in the bulk
RNiO3 phase diagram.[22] As n decreases from 8 to 6 uc, TN hardly changes due to the slightly altered OOR in this thickness
range. Remarkably, the further blocking of the in-plane OOR reduces TN from ∼91 K to ∼64 K as n decreases from 6 to 5 uc. This drop of TN is not substantial given the relatively small change
of the absolute Ni–O–Ni bond angle. It is interesting
to note that TN remains nearly constant
for n ≤ 5 in contrast to a rapidly increasing TMIT (Figure c). For the insulating SL with n =
2, the antiferromagnetic transition is manifested as an anomaly around
∼68 K of the d(ln ρ)/[d ln(1/T)] vs T curve, corresponding to a kink visualized from the enlarged
resistivity curve (Figure S7). This resembles
RNiO3 with small rare-earth ions.[46] X-ray resonant magnetic diffraction (RMD) measurements were performed
for the SLs with n = 4 and 2 (Figure d and Figure S7). The observation of the specific q = (1/4, 1/4,
1/4)pc reflection ascertains the presence of antiferromagnetic
order in the SLs even with 2-uc NNO. The integrated peak intensity
linearly decreases with increasing temperature, different from NNO
single films which follow the mean field model.[2,48] Such
abnormal temperature dependence is in line with that reported for
short-period NNO/NdAlO3 SLs, which has been ascribed to
the enhanced spin fluctuations in two-dimensional systems.[48] The linear extrapolations give onset temperatures
of ∼93 K for n = 2 and ∼90 K for n = 4 SL. The values are ∼30 K higher than those
derived from resistivity measurements. Such a discrepancy arises because
the RMD and derivative of resistivity characterize different stages
of the antiferromagnetic transition. While RMD probes the onset of
antiferromagnetic domains, the deflection point from the d(ln ρ)/[d
ln(1/T)] plot marks the percolation threshold. For
two-dimensional systems, the percolation occurs when the volume fraction
of the antiferromagnetic insulating phase reaches 50%.[49] Importantly, the RMD results strengthen the
conclusion that TN in SLs with n ≤ 5 is stable against further reducing n down to 2 uc.Taken together, the results suggest
that TN is mainly governed by the Ni–O–Ni
bond angle
and insensitive to the dimensional crossover in NNO/STO SLs. The argument
is supported by the report on NNO/NdAlO3 SLs, where a thickness-independent TN of ∼150 K is observed even with a 2-uc
thick NNO layer.[48] The quasi-two-dimensional
antiferromagnetic order preserved in RNiO3 is also consistent
with previous observations in LaNiO3/LaAlO3 SLs,
where an emergent antiferromagnetic order was probed in the otherwise
paramagnetic LaNiO3 when the layer thickness was reduced
to 2 uc.[13]To address the effects
of varied tetragonal distortions on the
MITs, we compared the MITs of NNO/STO SLs with n =
5 grown on (001)pc-NGO (apc = 3.858 Å), (001)-(LaAlO3)0.3(Sr2AlTaO6)0.7 (LSAT, a = 3.868 Å), and (001)-STO (a = 3.905 Å)
substrates. RSM measurements confirm their fully strained states and
identical tetragonal symmetry (Figure S8). The SLs grown on NGO and LSAT show very similar behavior, although
the one on LSAT shows slightly higher TMIT andTN (Figure a,d). By contrast, the greater tetragonal
distortion imposed by the STO substrate gives rise to substantially
increased TMIT andTN, as well as an enhanced resistivity jump across the MIT.
To understand the varied MIT behaviors, the electronic structure was
studied using XAS performed at O K- and Ni L-edges. Figure b shows the O K-edge prepeak
which arises from the strong covalency between the Ni 3d and O 2p
states. The peak position is determined by the charge transfer energy.[23,48,51] By taking the SL grown on NGO
as a reference, the prepeak shifts ∼25 meV and ∼95 meV
to lower energies for the SLs grown on LSAT andSTO, respectively
(Figure e). Such a
red shift of the O K-edge prepeak can be assigned to an increasing
charge transfer energy when the SL is subjected to a larger in-plane
tensile strain.[2,52]Figure c shows XAS at the Ni L-edge taken at 40
K, well below TMIT. Both the Ni L2- and L3-edges split into two peaks, resembling
bulk RNiO3.[51,53] We define ΔE as the energy separation of the two Ni L3 peaks given
the well-defined double-peak feature. ΔE increases
from 1.27 eV on NGO to 1.29 eV on LSAT and then to 1.45 eV on STO
(Figure f). The trend
is in line with that of bulk RNiO3 upon reducing the ion
radius of R, indicating that the charge transfer
energy and breathing distortions of NiO6 octahedra increase
with a.[51,53] Our results suggest
that robust MITs can be triggered by imposing a large tetragonal distortion
to NNO/STO SLs, albeit with strongly suppressed OOR.
Figure 4
MITs in NNO/STO SLs with
varied tetragonal distortions. (a) ρ–T curves of the n = 5 SLs grown on various
substrates. TMIT and TN are marked by arrows
and triangles, respectively. (b) XAS spectra of the prepeak of the
O K-edge at 300 K. (c) XAS spectra of the Ni L-edge at 40 K. ΔE is the splitting energy of the double peaks of the Ni
L3 edge. (d–f) Summary of the TMIT, TN, and energy shift
of the O K-edge prepeak relative to the SL grown on NGO, as well as
ΔE as a function of the in-plane lattice constant, a.
MITs in NNO/STO SLs with
varied tetragonal distortions. (a) ρ–T curves of the n = 5 SLs grown on various
substrates. TMIT andTN are marked by arrows
and triangles, respectively. (b) XAS spectra of the prepeak of the
O K-edge at 300 K. (c) XAS spectra of the Ni L-edge at 40 K. ΔE is the splitting energy of the double peaks of the Ni
L3 edge. (d–f) Summary of the TMIT, TN, and energy shift
of the O K-edge prepeak relative to the SL grown on NGO, as well as
ΔE as a function of the in-plane lattice constant, a.To summarize, the OOR of NNO/STO
SLs evolves from a modulated to
uniform pattern as we reduce the layer thickness of NNO. The altered
OOR profoundly influences the MIT and the antiferromagnetic transition.
We observe a reduced TMIT andTN, together with a weakened insulating ground
state as the OOR is suppressed. The dimensionality effect also plays
a role in the MIT which raises TMIT by
reducing the effective bandwidth. However, TN is closely linked to the modifications of the crystal structure
and is insusceptible to the dimensional crossover. Our results illustrate
that the delicate interplay between the spatial confinement and the
interfacial OOR coupling can be utilized to engineer novel electronic
phases at the atomic level.
Authors: Z Liao; M Huijben; Z Zhong; N Gauquelin; S Macke; R J Green; S Van Aert; J Verbeeck; G Van Tendeloo; K Held; G A Sawatzky; G Koster; G Rijnders Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: J Chakhalian; J M Rondinelli; Jian Liu; B A Gray; M Kareev; E J Moon; N Prasai; J L Cohn; M Varela; I C Tung; M J Bedzyk; S G Altendorf; F Strigari; B Dabrowski; L H Tjeng; P J Ryan; J W Freeland Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: P D C King; H I Wei; Y F Nie; M Uchida; C Adamo; S Zhu; X He; I Božović; D G Schlom; K M Shen Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2014-04-06 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Eric R Hoglund; De-Liang Bao; Andrew O'Hara; Sara Makarem; Zachary T Piontkowski; Joseph R Matson; Ajay K Yadav; Ryan C Haislmaier; Roman Engel-Herbert; Jon F Ihlefeld; Jayakanth Ravichandran; Ramamoorthy Ramesh; Joshua D Caldwell; Thomas E Beechem; John A Tomko; Jordan A Hachtel; Sokrates T Pantelides; Patrick E Hopkins; James M Howe Journal: Nature Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 69.504