Literature DB >> 35603969

Dimensionality-Controlled Evolution of Charge-Transfer Energy in Digital Nickelates Superlattices.

Xiangle Lu1,2, Jishan Liu1,2, Nian Zhang1,2, Binping Xie3, Shuai Yang1,2, Wanling Liu1,2, Zhicheng Jiang1,2, Zhe Huang1,2, Yichen Yang1,2, Jin Miao4, Wei Li4, Soohyun Cho1,2, Zhengtai Liu1,2, Zhonghao Liu1,2, Dawei Shen1,2.   

Abstract

Fundamental understanding and control of the electronic structure evolution in rare-earth nickelates is a fascinating and meaningful issue, as well as being helpful to understand the mechanism of recently discovered superconductivity. Here the dimensionality effect on the ground electronic state in high-quality (NdNiO3 ) m /(SrTiO3 )1 superlattices is systematically studied through transport and soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The metal-to-insulator transition temperature decreases with the thickness of the NdNiO3 slab decreasing from bulk to 7 unit cells, then increases gradually as m further reduces to 1 unit cell. Spectral evidence demonstrates that the stabilization of insulating phase can be attributed to the increase of the charge-transfer energy between O 2p and Ni 3d bands. The prominent multiplet feature on the Ni L3 edge develops with the decrease of NdNiO3 slab thickness, suggesting the strengthening of the charge disproportionate state under the dimensional confinement. This work provides convincing evidence that dimensionality is an effective knob to modulate the charge-transfer energy and thus the collective ground state in nickelates.
© 2022 The Authors. Advanced Science published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-ray absorption spectroscopy; charge-transfer energy; metal-to-insulator transition; nickelates superlattices

Year:  2022        PMID: 35603969      PMCID: PMC9313943          DOI: 10.1002/advs.202105864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)        ISSN: 2198-3844            Impact factor:   17.521


Introduction

Rare‐earth nickelates (RENiO3) are fascinating materials, which exhibit a wide range of exotic phenomena originating from the interplay among charge, spin, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom. Among their many exotic properties, the metal‐to‐insulator transition (MIT) is perhaps the most appealing one.[ , , , ] Particularly, the MIT temperature (T MIT) can be continuously tuned by changing rare‐earth ions,[ , , ] external strain,[ , , , , , ] charge transfer at heterostructure interface,[ , , ] length scales of interfacial coupling.[ ] Moreover, current advances in thin film growth technologies make it possible to obtain atomically precise digital oxide heterostructures and superlattices (SLs), which open the new window for investigating strongly correlated electron systems in confined geometries.[ , , ] In this context, artificial nickelate SLs would pave a promising way to explore and manipulate the metal‐to‐insulator transition by interface and dimensionality. While, the physical mechanism by which dimensionality modulates metal‐to‐insulator transition is very complex, the dimensionality could induce readjustment of octahedral rotations, electronic correlations, etc. A key ingredient in discovering the nature of metallic and insulating states is exploring the electronic states. Thus, it is vital to understand the dimensionality effect on the ground electronic state through systematic investigation of the MIT in nickelate SLs. The study of these mechanisms can significantly facilitate the design and application of devices based on nickelates. Furthermore, the recent discovery of superconductivity in Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 epitaxially grown on SrTiO3 (STO) has greatly simulated the study of superconductivity and correlations in transition metal nickelates.[ , , , , , ] To date, the mechanism of nickel‐based superconductors is still exclusive, although the consensus that the interface between Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 and STO and dimensionality of Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 should be intimately linked with the superconductivity has been achieved since the bulk doped NdNiO3 (NNO) is not superconducting.[ , ] Consequently, this fact greatly promoted the progress on the synthesis and characterization of ultrathin films and heterostructures of rare‐earth nickelates. In this work, we report the epitaxial growth of a series of high quality [(NdNiO3) /(SrTiO3)1] (m = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9) SLs using reactive molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). We then systematically investigated the electronic structure evolution with the thickness of NNO slab decrease in superlattice structure through transport and soft X‐ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). Here, the dimensionality can be effectively tuned through changing m in one unit cell of SLs. The T MIT decreases first when the thickness of the NNO slab is reduced from bulk to 7 unit cells, and then increases gradually until out of the measurement range up to 400 K from m = 7 to 1 unit cell. Soft XAS results reveal that the charge‐transfer energy, which is the energy cost for transferring an electron/hole from O 2p to Ni 3d bands, increases significantly with the thickness of NNO reducing, leading to the stabilization of the insulating phase in thinner NNO slabs. Meanwhile, prominent multiplet features on the Ni L 3 edge developed with the decrease of NdNiO3 slab thickness, which suggests the charge disproportionate states are strengthened. Our work provides compelling evidence that the dimensionality is an effective way to modulate the charge‐transfer energy between Ni 3d and O 2p, and plays an indispensable role in understanding the physical mechanism of dimensionality effect on the MIT of perovskite nickelates.

Results and Discussion

Figure  schematically shows crystal structure of NNO/STO SLs for m = 1, 2, and 3. Their corresponding reflection high‐energy electron diffraction (RHEED) [100] diffraction patterns are illustrated in Figure 1d–f. These RHEED patterns exhibit sharp, bright, and unmodulated streaks and no additional spots can be observed, indicating their atomically flat surfaces and high‐quality crystallinity. Figure 1d presents a typical oscillation of RHEED intensity integrated over the [00] diffraction rod for the m = 5 SL. Each growth cycle is highlighted in bright green and dark yellow, which represent the growth periods for one layer STO and 5 layers NNO, respectively. The regular RHEED oscillation (more details shown in the left lower enlarged inset) unambiguously demonstrates the layer‐by‐layer growth mode and atomic‐scale flatness for each layer during the epitaxial growth. The right upper inset of Figure 1g shows the atomic force microscope (AFM) morphology for the m = 5 SL. The average surface roughness is only 0.13 nm and the terrace‐step surface inherited from the substrate is clearly visible after the deposition, which further confirms the atomically flat surface of our SLs and layer‐by‐layer growth mode.
Figure 1

a–c) Structure schematics of the m = 1, 2, 3 (NdNiO3) /(SrTiO3)1 superlattices on SrTiO3(001) substrates and d–f) their corresponding RHEED patterns. The sharp and clear stripes on RHEED pattern show the in‐plane lattice arrangement of epitaxial SLs is very neat. g) Epitaxial growth time dependence of m = 5 SL RHEED diffraction intensity oscillation curve of [00] diffraction rod, which is marked with a red rectangle window in (a). Different colored backgrounds represent the growth of different films which reflects the layer‐by‐layer growth pattern of SL. The right upper inset is the typical flat morphology measured by AFM. (a.u. = arbitrary units).

a–c) Structure schematics of the m = 1, 2, 3 (NdNiO3) /(SrTiO3)1 superlattices on SrTiO3(001) substrates and d–f) their corresponding RHEED patterns. The sharp and clear stripes on RHEED pattern show the in‐plane lattice arrangement of epitaxial SLs is very neat. g) Epitaxial growth time dependence of m = 5 SL RHEED diffraction intensity oscillation curve of [00] diffraction rod, which is marked with a red rectangle window in (a). Different colored backgrounds represent the growth of different films which reflects the layer‐by‐layer growth pattern of SL. The right upper inset is the typical flat morphology measured by AFM. (a.u. = arbitrary units). To further characterize the phase purity and crystallinity of these SLs, high‐resolution X‐ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried out. Figure  shows the out‐of‐plane θ–2θ scans around the STO (002) peak for m = 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 SLs, respectively. Besides the diffractions from STO substrates, the SL main peaks with satellite peaks can be observed, which demonstrate the phase‐pure and epitaxial (001) oriented SLs. Furthermore, Laue oscillations around the SLs main diffraction peaks are clearly visible which suggest lateral homogeneity and well‐defined interface between the epitaxial films and the substrate. The inset of Figure 2 illustrates the rocking curve around the fundamental peak for m = 3 SL, which is a universally agreed‐on means to characterize the crystalline quality of epitaxial films. The full width at half maximums (FWHMs) is only about 0.062° through Gaussian fitting, revealing the superior crystalline perfection of this SL. Note that all the SLs in this work exhibit similar characteristic RHEED patterns, AFM morphologies and FWHMs of rocking curves, as shown in Figures S1–S3 of the Supporting Information, demonstrating the well‐controlled thickness, smooth surface, sharp interface and high‐quality crystallinity of our samples. Moreover, all the films grown on STO substrates are fully strained without relaxation, as demonstrated in Figures S4 and S5.
Figure 2

a) The typical film X‐ray diffraction (θ–2θ) scans for m = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 SLs. The black arrows point to the (002) Bragg peak of STO and SLs main peak near STO (002), respectively. The satellite peaks of SLs are indicated by green triangles and their changes with m can be seen clearly. Black ∗ is the spurious signal of equipment. Inset is the typical rocking curve of m = 3 SL, which is sharp and comparable to that of substrate.

a) The typical film X‐ray diffraction (θ–2θ) scans for m = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 SLs. The black arrows point to the (002) Bragg peak of STO and SLs main peak near STO (002), respectively. The satellite peaks of SLs are indicated by green triangles and their changes with m can be seen clearly. Black ∗ is the spurious signal of equipment. Inset is the typical rocking curve of m = 3 SL, which is sharp and comparable to that of substrate. Figure  displays the in‐plane resistivity as a function of temperature ranged from 10 to 300 K. A systemic change of the MIT was obtained across the whole SLs series. The T MIT decreases first when the thickness of NNO slab is reduced from bulk to m = 7, and then increases gradually until out of the measurement range up to 400 K from m = 7 to 1, as shown in Figure 3b, in which the T MIT of different SLs were obtained through derivation dρ/dT  =  0 form Figure 3a. Note that the hysteresis in resistivity is markedly weakened upon reducing m (Figure S7, Supporting Information), which could be ascribe to the suppression of the structural change under the dimensional confinement. Here, the decrease of T MIT with the thickness of NNO slab reducing from bulk to 7 unit cells can be attributed to the tensile stain effect. The tensile strain could straighten the Ni–O–Ni bond angle, and the orbital overlap is thus enhanced between Ni 3d states and O 2p states, which results in the increase of the bandwidth and thus the decrease of T MIT.[ , , ] While, with the thickness of NNO slab decreasing further, we speculate that dimensionality or quantum confinement effect would dominate the ground electronic state, which leads to the carriers localization behavior for ultrathin NNO slabs.
Figure 3

a) Resistivity versus temperature during warming for SLs and 50 unit cells NNO. b) T MIT as a function of m value. The hollow box means that the SLs of m = 1, 2 are the insulators within the measurement temperature range. c–e) Linear fit (red line) to 2D variable range hopping, small polaron hopping, and activated conduction model for m = 2 SL, respectively.

a) Resistivity versus temperature during warming for SLs and 50 unit cells NNO. b) T MIT as a function of m value. The hollow box means that the SLs of m = 1, 2 are the insulators within the measurement temperature range. c–e) Linear fit (red line) to 2D variable range hopping, small polaron hopping, and activated conduction model for m = 2 SL, respectively. To understand the resistivity evolution with m, we conducted a fitting analysis on these resistivity curves using three transport models of variable range hopping, small polaron hopping, and activated behavior (also known as nearest neighbors hopping), as shown in Figure 3c–e. The resistivity for m = 2 SL was found best fitted with the activated behavior model at high temperatures above 118 K. The activated behavior is an activation process in semiconducting systems, which follows , where E g is the thermal activation energy of hopping electrons, and the k B is Boltzmann constant. The fitting result indicates a gap opened with m reducing into a limit value.[ , ] Nextly, soft XAS measurements were performed to gain microscopic insight into the effect of dimensionality and quantum confinement on the nature of MIT. Figure  shows the normalized O K‐edge XAS pre‐edge features for these SLs. These prepeaks are located at around 529 eV, corresponding to the transition from the O 1s core to the lowest unoccupied hybridized O 2p–Ni 3d band. We observed that these prepeaks exhibit a remarkable energy shift toward lower photon energy with m reducing from m = 7 to 1, as shown in Figure 4a,b. The positions of prepeak were determined by the charge‐transfer energy (Δ), which is the energy cost for transferring an electron/hole from the O 2p band to the Ni 3d band.[ , ] The remarkable shift of oxygen pre‐edge highlights an increase of Δ when the NNO slab reducing. The increment of charge‐transfer energy could be further revealed by the Ni L edge spectroscopy. The normalized spectra of Ni L 3 edge are illustrated in Figure 4c. The Ni L 3 edge displays a splitting into two primary peaks, and the splitting becomes more and more pronounced with m reducing. Such peak splitting has been associated with the charge‐transfer energy separating the O 2p and Ni 3d states near the Fermi level in previous literature.[ , , ] To quantify the observed multiplet splitting energy, we fit the Ni L 3 spectra with the sum of two peaks for all SLs. The Ni L 3 splitting energy becomes enlarged as m reducing, indicating the increase of charge‐transfer energy, as demonstrated in Figure 4e. This finding is in good agreement with the observed shift of O K‐edge prepeaks. Note that no charge transfer happened at the STO/NNO interface for the Ti cation strongly prefers the +4 oxidation state regardless of the thickness of NNO slab, as shown in Figure S8.
Figure 4

a) Normalized prepeak of O K‐edge absorption for (NNO) /(STO)1 SLs measured at room temperature. Shaded line is guide for eyes. b) The position of O K‐edge prepeak versus m value of SLs, which determined by the charge‐transfer energy between O 2p and Ni 3d band. Error bars are limited to the photon energy resolution. (c) Normalized Ni L 3 edges of the SLs. The shaded green areas highlight the evolution of the multiplet feature. Vertical bars are guide for eyes to view the shift of the peaks. d) The fitting of Ni L 3 spectra with the sum of two peaks for selected m SLs. e) The splitting energy extracted from fitting of Ni L 3 edge for SLs as a function of m value.

a) Normalized prepeak of O K‐edge absorption for (NNO) /(STO)1 SLs measured at room temperature. Shaded line is guide for eyes. b) The position of O K‐edge prepeak versus m value of SLs, which determined by the charge‐transfer energy between O 2p and Ni 3d band. Error bars are limited to the photon energy resolution. (c) Normalized Ni L 3 edges of the SLs. The shaded green areas highlight the evolution of the multiplet feature. Vertical bars are guide for eyes to view the shift of the peaks. d) The fitting of Ni L 3 spectra with the sum of two peaks for selected m SLs. e) The splitting energy extracted from fitting of Ni L 3 edge for SLs as a function of m value. Thus, we can elucidate the increase of T MIT observed in transport behaviors. As well known, the extent of metal 3d–oxygen 2p hybridization scales with the ratio of the transfer integral to charge‐transfer energy.[ ] For nickelates, the Ni 3d–O 2p hybridization is primarily controlled by charge‐transfer energy, while the transfer integral has a weaker influence.[ ] Therefore, the increase of Δ with m decreasing would significantly weaken the Ni 3d–O 2p hybridization, resulting in the stabilization of the insulating phase. In addition, the observed multiplet feature on the Ni L edges in our case is closely reminiscent of absorption spectra of dimensional‐confined heterostructured LaNiO3 slabs and other members of RENiO3 series with smaller RE ions in the insulating phase,[ , , , ] which have been identified as a signature of localized carriers in insulating charge‐ordered nickelates. This inspires us to conjecture that the carriers gradually tend to be localized caused by charge ordering as the NNO slab reducing. While, it is worth noting that nickelates are well recognized as negative charge transfer materials because of strong hybridization between the oxygen 2p and nickel 3d bands.[ , , ] The ground electronic state of Ni3+ is more likely as d8 . In that case, the electronic disproportionation (bond and charge) can be described as d8 + d8 → d8 + d8 2.[ ] This picture has been confirmed by both theories and experiments,[ , , , ] providing an understanding of the metal‐to‐insulator transition as a site‐selective Mott transition, in which the charge disproportionation takes place on the oxygen sites.[ ] This model differs from the traditional charge‐disproportionation ones wherein the Ni 3d7 moves toward an alternation of Ni 3d7− and 3d7+ sites in the insulating phase. In this scenario, the nickelates undergo an effective charge diproportionation achieved without any significant movement of charge between neighboring NiO6 octahedra, and the insulating phase results from a partial volume collapse of oxygen octahedra with two ligand holes around their central Ni, while the other octahedra expand accordingly with little net effect on the total volume.[ , ]

Conclusion

High‐quality (NdNiO3) /(SrTiO3)1 superlattices were grown to study the dimensionality effect on the ground electronic state of NdNiO3. The metal‐to‐insulator transition temperature decrease first, then increase gradually as the thickness of NNO slab decrease from bulk to 1 unit cell. Microscopically, the charge transfer energy between O 2p and Ni 3d was confirmed to increase as the thickness of the NNO slab reduced from 7 to 1 unit cell, which lead to the metal‐to‐insulator transition temperature gradually increasing until the superlattice becomes an insulator. Charge disproportionation was identified by the strong multiplet feature developed on the leading edge of Ni L 3 edge. Our work provides a paradigm for the manipulation of electronic ground states by adjusting the thickness at the nanometer scale, which is helpful for understanding the dimensionality effect on the physical properties of perovskite nickel.

Experimental Section

High‐quality [(NdNiO3) /(SrTiO3)1] SLs (m = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9) were grown in a layer‐by‐layer mode on (001)‐oriented STO substrates using a DCA R450 reactive MBE system. At room temperature, the pseudocubic lattice constants for orthorhombic structure NdNiO3(a = 3.803 Å), which is expected to be subjected to tensile strain on STO substrate (3.905 Å). Atomically flat, TiO2‐terminated stepped STO substrates were purchased from SHINKOSHA of Japan, and they were annealed at 300 °C in an ultrahigh vacuum (2 × 10−9 Torr) for half an hour to get rid of the volatile contaminates before growth. High purity element strontium (Sr), titanium (Ti), neodymium (Nd), and nickel (Ni) were evaporated through thermal Knudsen cells. The flux of each metal source was calibrated prior to film growth at the position of the substrate using a quartz crystal microbalance measurement. During the epitaxy process, the substrate temperature was maintained at 550 °C in a distilled ozone atmosphere of 5 × 10−6 Torr. Here, the distilled ozone was supplied by a DCA Ozone Delivery System. During growth, both the growth rate and surface structure were monitored by in situ RHEED. The structure characterization of the films was carried out in a Bruker‐D8 discover XRD with Cu Kα (λ = 0.154 nm). In‐plane transport measurements were performed by means of the conventional H. C. Montgomery technique in the temperature ranged from 10 to 400 K using a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System.[ ] Electrodes were made by silver glue or bonding aluminum wires, which were directly welded onto the SLs’ surfaces. Soft XAS measurements were performed at 02B beamline of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility. The L‐edge of Ni and the K‐edge of O spectra were collected using the total electron yield mode at the room temperature in an ultrahigh vacuum chamber with a base pressure better than 1 × 10−9 Torr. All results have been calibrated with reference samples, which were measured simultaneously.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Supporting Information Click here for additional data file.
  30 in total

1.  Neutron-diffraction study of RNiO3 (R=La,Pr,Nd,Sm): Electronically induced structural changes across the metal-insulator transition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1992-08-15

2.  Covalency-driven unusual metal-insulator transition in nickelates.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1994-03-15

3.  Disentangled Cooperative Orderings in Artificial Rare-Earth Nickelates.

Authors:  S Middey; D Meyers; M Kareev; Yanwei Cao; X Liu; P Shafer; J W Freeland; J-W Kim; P J Ryan; J Chakhalian
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Interfacial charge-transfer Mott state in iridate-nickelate superlattices.

Authors:  Xiaoran Liu; Michele Kotiuga; Heung-Sik Kim; Alpha T N'Diaye; Yongseong Choi; Qinghua Zhang; Yanwei Cao; Mikhail Kareev; Fangdi Wen; Banabir Pal; John W Freeland; Lin Gu; Daniel Haskel; Padraic Shafer; Elke Arenholz; Kristjan Haule; David Vanderbilt; Karin M Rabe; Jak Chakhalian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Metal-insulator transition in ultrathin LaNiO3 films.

Authors:  R Scherwitzl; S Gariglio; M Gabay; P Zubko; M Gibert; J-M Triscone
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Atomic-scale control of competing electronic phases in ultrathin LaNiO₃.

Authors:  P D C King; H I Wei; Y F Nie; M Uchida; C Adamo; S Zhu; X He; I Božović; D G Schlom; K M Shen
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 39.213

7.  Hybridization-controlled charge transfer and induced magnetism at correlated oxide interfaces.

Authors:  J Varignon; G Sanchez-Santolino; M N Grisolia; A Arora; S Valencia; M Varela; R Abrudan; E Weschke; E Schierle; J E Rault; J-P Rueff; A Barthélémy; J Santamaria; M Bibes
Journal:  Nat Phys       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 20.034

8.  Ground-state oxygen holes and the metal-insulator transition in the negative charge-transfer rare-earth nickelates.

Authors:  Valentina Bisogni; Sara Catalano; Robert J Green; Marta Gibert; Raoul Scherwitzl; Yaobo Huang; Vladimir N Strocov; Pavlo Zubko; Shadi Balandeh; Jean-Marc Triscone; George Sawatzky; Thorsten Schmitt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Dimensionality-Controlled Evolution of Charge-Transfer Energy in Digital Nickelates Superlattices.

Authors:  Xiangle Lu; Jishan Liu; Nian Zhang; Binping Xie; Shuai Yang; Wanling Liu; Zhicheng Jiang; Zhe Huang; Yichen Yang; Jin Miao; Wei Li; Soohyun Cho; Zhengtai Liu; Zhonghao Liu; Dawei Shen
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 17.521

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dimensionality-Controlled Evolution of Charge-Transfer Energy in Digital Nickelates Superlattices.

Authors:  Xiangle Lu; Jishan Liu; Nian Zhang; Binping Xie; Shuai Yang; Wanling Liu; Zhicheng Jiang; Zhe Huang; Yichen Yang; Jin Miao; Wei Li; Soohyun Cho; Zhengtai Liu; Zhonghao Liu; Dawei Shen
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 17.521

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.