| Literature DB >> 35603969 |
Xiangle Lu1,2, Jishan Liu1,2, Nian Zhang1,2, Binping Xie3, Shuai Yang1,2, Wanling Liu1,2, Zhicheng Jiang1,2, Zhe Huang1,2, Yichen Yang1,2, Jin Miao4, Wei Li4, Soohyun Cho1,2, Zhengtai Liu1,2, Zhonghao Liu1,2, Dawei Shen1,2.
Abstract
Fundamental understanding and control of the electronic structure evolution in rare-earth nickelates is a fascinating and meaningful issue, as well as being helpful to understand the mechanism of recently discovered superconductivity. Here the dimensionality effect on the ground electronic state in high-quality (NdNiO3 ) m /(SrTiO3 )1 superlattices is systematically studied through transport and soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The metal-to-insulator transition temperature decreases with the thickness of the NdNiO3 slab decreasing from bulk to 7 unit cells, then increases gradually as m further reduces to 1 unit cell. Spectral evidence demonstrates that the stabilization of insulating phase can be attributed to the increase of the charge-transfer energy between O 2p and Ni 3d bands. The prominent multiplet feature on the Ni L3 edge develops with the decrease of NdNiO3 slab thickness, suggesting the strengthening of the charge disproportionate state under the dimensional confinement. This work provides convincing evidence that dimensionality is an effective knob to modulate the charge-transfer energy and thus the collective ground state in nickelates.Entities:
Keywords: X-ray absorption spectroscopy; charge-transfer energy; metal-to-insulator transition; nickelates superlattices
Year: 2022 PMID: 35603969 PMCID: PMC9313943 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202105864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 17.521
Figure 1a–c) Structure schematics of the m = 1, 2, 3 (NdNiO3) /(SrTiO3)1 superlattices on SrTiO3(001) substrates and d–f) their corresponding RHEED patterns. The sharp and clear stripes on RHEED pattern show the in‐plane lattice arrangement of epitaxial SLs is very neat. g) Epitaxial growth time dependence of m = 5 SL RHEED diffraction intensity oscillation curve of [00] diffraction rod, which is marked with a red rectangle window in (a). Different colored backgrounds represent the growth of different films which reflects the layer‐by‐layer growth pattern of SL. The right upper inset is the typical flat morphology measured by AFM. (a.u. = arbitrary units).
Figure 2a) The typical film X‐ray diffraction (θ–2θ) scans for m = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 SLs. The black arrows point to the (002) Bragg peak of STO and SLs main peak near STO (002), respectively. The satellite peaks of SLs are indicated by green triangles and their changes with m can be seen clearly. Black ∗ is the spurious signal of equipment. Inset is the typical rocking curve of m = 3 SL, which is sharp and comparable to that of substrate.
Figure 3a) Resistivity versus temperature during warming for SLs and 50 unit cells NNO. b) T MIT as a function of m value. The hollow box means that the SLs of m = 1, 2 are the insulators within the measurement temperature range. c–e) Linear fit (red line) to 2D variable range hopping, small polaron hopping, and activated conduction model for m = 2 SL, respectively.
Figure 4a) Normalized prepeak of O K‐edge absorption for (NNO) /(STO)1 SLs measured at room temperature. Shaded line is guide for eyes. b) The position of O K‐edge prepeak versus m value of SLs, which determined by the charge‐transfer energy between O 2p and Ni 3d band. Error bars are limited to the photon energy resolution. (c) Normalized Ni L 3 edges of the SLs. The shaded green areas highlight the evolution of the multiplet feature. Vertical bars are guide for eyes to view the shift of the peaks. d) The fitting of Ni L 3 spectra with the sum of two peaks for selected m SLs. e) The splitting energy extracted from fitting of Ni L 3 edge for SLs as a function of m value.