Literature DB >> 33468666

Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security.

Varsha Vijay1, Paul R Armsworth2.   

Abstract

Global cropland expansion over the last century caused widespread habitat loss and degradation. Establishment of protected areas aims to counteract the loss of habitats and to slow species extinctions. However, many protected areas also include high levels of habitat disturbance and conversion for uses such as cropland. Understanding where and why this occurs may realign conservation priorities and inform protected area policy in light of competing priorities such as food security. Here, we use our global synthesis cropland dataset to quantify cropland in protected areas globally and assess their relationship to conservation aims and socio-environmental context. We estimate that cropland occupies 1.4 million km2 or 6% of global protected area. Cropland occurs across all protected area management types, with 22% occurring in strictly protected areas. Cropland inside protected areas is more prevalent in countries with higher population density, lower income inequality, and with higher agricultural suitability of protected lands. While this phenomenon is dominant in midnorthern latitudes, areas of cropland in protected areas of the tropics and subtropics may present greater trade-offs due to higher levels of both biodiversity and food insecurity. Although area-based targets are prominent in biodiversity goal-setting, our results show that they can mask persistent anthropogenic land uses detrimental to native ecosystem conservation. To ensure the long-term efficacy of protected areas, post-2020 goal setting must link aims for biodiversity and human health and improve monitoring of conservation outcomes in cropland-impacted protected areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBD; area-based targets; conservation; food security; protected areas

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33468666      PMCID: PMC7848742          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2010121118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  39 in total

1.  Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change.

Authors:  D Tilman; J Fargione; B Wolff; C D'Antonio; A Dobson; R Howarth; D Schindler; W H Schlesinger; D Simberloff; D Swackhamer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity.

Authors:  A G Bruner; R E Gullison; R E Rice; G A da Fonseca
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Protected areas in Europe: principle and practice.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Sarah F Jackson; Arnold Nagy; Lisette Cantú-Salazar; Mark Johnson
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  The performance and potential of protected areas.

Authors:  James E M Watson; Nigel Dudley; Daniel B Segan; Marc Hockings
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity.

Authors:  Tim Newbold; Lawrence N Hudson; Samantha L L Hill; Sara Contu; Igor Lysenko; Rebecca A Senior; Luca Börger; Dominic J Bennett; Argyrios Choimes; Ben Collen; Julie Day; Adriana De Palma; Sandra Díaz; Susy Echeverria-Londoño; Melanie J Edgar; Anat Feldman; Morgan Garon; Michelle L K Harrison; Tamera Alhusseini; Daniel J Ingram; Yuval Itescu; Jens Kattge; Victoria Kemp; Lucinda Kirkpatrick; Michael Kleyer; David Laginha Pinto Correia; Callum D Martin; Shai Meiri; Maria Novosolov; Yuan Pan; Helen R P Phillips; Drew W Purves; Alexandra Robinson; Jake Simpson; Sean L Tuck; Evan Weiher; Hannah J White; Robert M Ewers; Georgina M Mace; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure.

Authors:  Kendall R Jones; Oscar Venter; Richard A Fuller; James R Allan; Sean L Maxwell; Pablo Jose Negret; James E M Watson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Global consequences of land use.

Authors:  Jonathan A Foley; Ruth Defries; Gregory P Asner; Carol Barford; Gordon Bonan; Stephen R Carpenter; F Stuart Chapin; Michael T Coe; Gretchen C Daily; Holly K Gibbs; Joseph H Helkowski; Tracey Holloway; Erica A Howard; Christopher J Kucharik; Chad Monfreda; Jonathan A Patz; I Colin Prentice; Navin Ramankutty; Peter K Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Biodiversity at risk under future cropland expansion and intensification.

Authors:  Laura Kehoe; Alfredo Romero-Muñoz; Ester Polaina; Lyndon Estes; Holger Kreft; Tobias Kuemmerle
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 15.460

9.  Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security.

Authors:  Varsha Vijay; Paul R Armsworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  A global reference database of crowdsourced cropland data collected using the Geo-Wiki platform.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Laso Bayas; Myroslava Lesiv; François Waldner; Anne Schucknecht; Martina Duerauer; Linda See; Steffen Fritz; Dilek Fraisl; Inian Moorthy; Ian McCallum; Christoph Perger; Olha Danylo; Pierre Defourny; Javier Gallego; Sven Gilliams; Ibrar Ul Hassan Akhtar; Swarup Jyoti Baishya; Mrinal Baruah; Khangsembou Bungnamei; Alfredo Campos; Trishna Changkakati; Anna Cipriani; Krishna Das; Keemee Das; Inamani Das; Kyle Frankel Davis; Purabi Hazarika; Brian Alan Johnson; Ziga Malek; Monia Elisa Molinari; Kripal Panging; Chandra Kant Pawe; Ana Pérez-Hoyos; Parag Kumar Sahariah; Dhrubajyoti Sahariah; Anup Saikia; Meghna Saikia; Peter Schlesinger; Elena Seidacaru; Kuleswar Singha; John W Wilson
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.444

View more
  3 in total

1.  Biodiversity effects of food system sustainability actions from farm to fork.

Authors:  Quentin D Read; Kelly L Hondula; Mary K Muth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security.

Authors:  Varsha Vijay; Paul R Armsworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Species ethnobotanical values rather than regional species pool determine plant diversity in agroforestry systems.

Authors:  Daniel K N'Woueni; Orou G Gaoue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.