Literature DB >> 33468001

The effect of optic flow cues on honeybee flight control in wind.

Emily Baird1, Norbert Boeddeker2, Mandyam V Srinivasan3.   

Abstract

To minimize the risk of colliding with the ground or other obstacles, flying animals need to control both their ground speed and ground height. This task is particularly challenging in wind, where head winds require an animal to increase its airspeed to maintain a constant ground speed and tail winds may generate negative airspeeds, rendering flight more difficult to control. In this study, we investigate how head and tail winds affect flight control in the honeybee Apis mellifera, which is known to rely on the pattern of visual motion generated across the eye-known as optic flow-to maintain constant ground speeds and heights. We find that, when provided with both longitudinal and transverse optic flow cues (in or perpendicular to the direction of flight, respectively), honeybees maintain a constant ground speed but fly lower in head winds and higher in tail winds, a response that is also observed when longitudinal optic flow cues are minimized. When the transverse component of optic flow is minimized, or when all optic flow cues are minimized, the effect of wind on ground height is abolished. We propose that the regular sidewards oscillations that the bees make as they fly may be used to extract information about the distance to the ground, independently of the longitudinal optic flow that they use for ground speed control. This computationally simple strategy could have potential uses in the development of lightweight and robust systems for guiding autonomous flying vehicles in natural environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bee; flight; height; optic flow; speed; wind

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33468001      PMCID: PMC7893265          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.3051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  15 in total

1.  Bumblebee flight performance in environments of different proximity.

Authors:  Nellie Linander; Emily Baird; Marie Dacke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Pheromone-regulated anemotaxis in flying moths.

Authors:  J S Kennedy; D Marsh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-05-31       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The functional role of contrast adaptation.

Authors:  M W Greenlee; F Heitger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Honeybees change their height to restore their optic flow.

Authors:  Geoffrey Portelli; Franck Ruffier; Nicolas Franceschini
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Visual control of flight speed in honeybees.

Authors:  Emily Baird; Mandyam V Srinivasan; Shaowu Zhang; Ann Cowling
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  How insects infer range from visual motion.

Authors:  M V Srinivasan
Journal:  Rev Oculomot Res       Date:  1993

7.  Honeybee flight: a novel 'streamlining' response.

Authors:  Tien Luu; Allen Cheung; David Ball; Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Visual regulation of ground speed and headwind compensation in freely flying honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Andrew Barron; Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  The effect of optic flow cues on honeybee flight control in wind.

Authors:  Emily Baird; Norbert Boeddeker; Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Airflow and optic flow mediate antennal positioning in flying honeybees.

Authors:  Taruni Roy Khurana; Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  6 in total

1.  The effect of optic flow cues on honeybee flight control in wind.

Authors:  Emily Baird; Norbert Boeddeker; Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Bumblebees display characteristics of active vision during robust obstacle avoidance flight.

Authors:  Sridhar Ravi; Tim Siesenop; Olivier J Bertrand; Liang Li; Charlotte Doussot; Alex Fisher; William H Warren; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Bumblebees land rapidly and robustly using a sophisticated modular flight control strategy.

Authors:  Pulkit Goyal; Antoine Cribellier; Guido C H E de Croon; Martin J Lankheet; Johan L van Leeuwen; Remco P M Pieters; Florian T Muijres
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-04-24

4.  Spatial tuning of translational optic flow responses in hawkmoths of varying body size.

Authors:  Rebecca Grittner; Emily Baird; Anna Stöckl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Stability and manoeuvrability in animal movement: lessons from biology, modelling and robotics.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener; Richard J Bomphrey; Monica A Daley; Auke J Ijspeert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Wind and route choice affect performance of bees flying above versus within a cluttered obstacle field.

Authors:  Nicholas P Burnett; Marc A Badger; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.