Literature DB >> 26614094

Bumblebee flight performance in environments of different proximity.

Nellie Linander1, Emily Baird2, Marie Dacke1.   

Abstract

Flying animals are capable of navigating through environments of different complexity with high precision. To control their flight when negotiating narrow tunnels, bees and birds use the magnitude of apparent image motion (known as optic flow) generated by the walls. In their natural habitat, however, these animals would encounter both cluttered and open environments. Here, we investigate how large changes in the proximity of nearby surfaces affect optic flow-based flight control strategies. We trained bumblebees to fly along a flight and recorded how the distance between the walls--from 60 cm to 240 cm--affected their flight control. Our results reveal that, as tunnel width increases, both lateral position and ground speed become increasingly variable. We also find that optic flow information from the ground has an increasing influence on flight control, suggesting that bumblebees measure optic flow flexibly over a large lateral and ventral field of view, depending on where the highest magnitude of optic flow occurs. A consequence of this strategy is that, when flying in narrow spaces, bumblebees use optic flow information from the nearby obstacles to control flight, while in more open spaces they rely primarily on optic flow cues from the ground.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bombus terrestris; Flight control; Height; Position; Speed; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26614094     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-015-1055-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  18 in total

1.  Insect vision: controlling actions through optic flow.

Authors:  Thomas S Collett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Optic flow cues guide flight in birds.

Authors:  Partha S Bhagavatula; Charles Claudianos; Michael R Ibbotson; Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Minimum viewing angle for visually guided ground speed control in bumblebees.

Authors:  Emily Baird; Torill Kornfeldt; Marie Dacke
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  The spatial frequency tuning of optic-flow-dependent behaviors in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens.

Authors:  Jonathan P Dyhr; Charles M Higgins
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Bumblebees measure optic flow for position and speed control flexibly within the frontal visual field.

Authors:  Nellie Linander; Marie Dacke; Emily Baird
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Optic flow.

Authors:  J J Koenderink
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Range perception through apparent image speed in freely flying honeybees.

Authors:  M V Srinivasan; M Lehrer; W H Kirchner; S W Zhang
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Nocturnal insects use optic flow for flight control.

Authors:  Emily Baird; Eva Kreiss; William Wcislo; Eric Warrant; Marie Dacke
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Visual control of flight speed in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Steven N Fry; Nicola Rohrseitz; Andrew D Straw; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Direct Evidence for Vision-based Control of Flight Speed in Budgerigars.

Authors:  Ingo Schiffner; Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  12 in total

1.  The effect of optic flow cues on honeybee flight control in wind.

Authors:  Emily Baird; Norbert Boeddeker; Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Altitude control in honeybees: joint vision-based learning and guidance.

Authors:  Geoffrey Portelli; Julien R Serres; Franck Ruffier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  How bumblebees use lateral and ventral optic flow cues for position control in environments of different proximity.

Authors:  Nellie Linander; Emily Baird; Marie Dacke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  High contrast sensitivity for visually guided flight control in bumblebees.

Authors:  Aravin Chakravarthi; Almut Kelber; Emily Baird; Marie Dacke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  The role of spatial texture in visual control of bumblebee learning flights.

Authors:  Nellie Linander; Marie Dacke; Emily Baird; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The role of optic flow pooling in insect flight control in cluttered environments.

Authors:  Julien Lecoeur; Marie Dacke; Dario Floreano; Emily Baird
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Spatial Vision and Visually Guided Behavior in Apidae.

Authors:  Almut Kelber; Hema Somanathan
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  Dynamic Echo Information Guides Flight in the Big Brown Bat.

Authors:  Michaela Warnecke; Wu-Jung Lee; Anand Krishnan; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Spatial Encoding of Translational Optic Flow in Planar Scenes by Elementary Motion Detector Arrays.

Authors:  Julien Lecoeur; Emily Baird; Dario Floreano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Dominant Role of Visual Motion Cues in Bumblebee Flight Control Revealed Through Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Elisa Frasnelli; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra; Finlay J Stewart
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.