Literature DB >> 22227176

Impact of coexistent lumbar spine disorders on clinical outcomes and physician charges associated with total hip arthroplasty.

Heidi Prather1, Linda R Van Dillen, Steven M Kymes, Melissa A Armbrecht, Dustin Stwalley, John C Clohisy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Despite the common prevalence of lumbar spine and degenerative hip disorders, there are few descriptions of patients with coexisting hip disorders and lumbar spine disorders (LSDs). The independent economic burden of each disorder is substantial, but the financial burden when the disorders are coexisting is unknown.
PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of coexisting hip disorders and LSDs in a large cohort of patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) as well as the impact on pain and functional THA outcomes and physician charges. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective study performed at a tertiary university. PATIENT SAMPLE: Three thousand two hundred six patients underwent total hip replacement from 1996 to 2008. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-report measures: visual analog scale. Functional measures: modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) hip questionnaire. Economic impact measures: physician medical charges.
METHODS: International Classification of Diseases, Version 9, billing codes related to LSDs were cross-referenced with the 3,206 patients who had undergone a THA to determine which patients were also evaluated by a spine specialist. Demographic, hip clinical outcomes, and physician charges for patients with THA alone (THA alone) were compared with patients treated with THA and diagnosed with an LSD (THA+LSD).
RESULTS: Of 3,206 patients who underwent THA, 566 (18%) were also evaluated by a spine specialist. Of those with an LSD, 334 (59%) were women with an older average age (64.5 ± 13.3 years) compared with patients treated with THA alone (51%, 58.5 ± 15.5 years, p = .0001). Patients in the THA alone group as compared with the THA+LSD group had greater improvement in the mHHS (p=.0001), UCLA score (p=.0001), and pain (p=.0001). Patients in the THA+LSD group incurred on average $2,668 more in charges per episode of care as compared with patients in the THA alone group (p<.001). Patients in the THA+LSD group had more days per episode of care (p=.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing THA alone had greater improvement in function and pain relief with fewer medical charges as compared with patients undergoing a THA and treatment for an LSD. The prevalence of coexisting hip disorders and spine disorders is likely higher than currently documented. Further study is needed to improve therapeutic recommendations and determine the potential for reduction in medical expenses associated with concurrent treatment of hip OA and LSDs.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22227176      PMCID: PMC3340523          DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  26 in total

1.  Use of fluoroscopically guided intra-articular hip injection in differentiating the pain source in concomitant hip and lumbar spine arthritis.

Authors:  Dhruv B Pateder; Marc W Hungerford
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2007-11

2.  Clinical presentation of patients with tears of the acetabular labrum.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Gregory J Della Rocca; Heidi Prather; Madelyn Curry; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?

Authors:  Robert J Gatchel; Tom G Mayer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Degenerative joint disease in the hip and spine.

Authors:  W A Saunders; J A Gleeson; D M Timlin; T D Preston; D A Brewerton
Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil       Date:  1979-08

5.  Hip-spine syndrome: the effect of total hip replacement surgery on low back pain in severe osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Peleg Ben-Galim; Tal Ben-Galim; Nahshon Rand; Amir Haim; John Hipp; Shmuel Dekel; Yizhar Floman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Sacroiliac joint: pain referral maps upon applying a new injection/arthrography technique. Part I: Asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  J D Fortin; A P Dwyer; S West; J Pier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The relationship between hip rotation range of movement and low back pain prevalence in amateur golfers: an observational study.

Authors:  Eoghan Murray; Emma Birley; Richard Twycross-Lewis; Dylan Morrissey
Journal:  Phys Ther Sport       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Clinical presentation of patients with symptomatic anterior hip impingement.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; Evan R Knaus; Devyani M Hunt; John M Lesher; Marcie Harris-Hayes; Heidi Prather
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Lumbar spinal stenosis. A cause of continued pain and disability in patients after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  W R Bohl; A D Steffee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1979 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Hip and shoulder internal rotation range of motion deficits in professional tennis players.

Authors:  V B Vad; A Gebeh; D Dines; D Altchek; B Norris
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.319

View more
  7 in total

1.  The relationship of pelvic incidence to post-operative total hip arthroplasty dislocation in patients with lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Philip J York; Alan W McGee; Chase S Dean; Justin E Hellwinkel; Christopher J Kleck; Michael R Dayton; Craig A Hogan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Toward understanding the underlying mechanisms of pelvic tilt reserve in adult spinal deformity: the role of the 3D hip orientation.

Authors:  Mario Mekhael; Georges Kawkabani; Renée Maria Saliby; Wafa Skalli; Eddy Saad; Elena Jaber; Rami Rachkidi; Khalil Kharrat; Gaby Kreichati; Ismat Ghanem; Virginie Lafage; Ayman Assi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Sagittal Pelvic Kinematics in Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas E Niemeier; Brad W Wills; Steven M Theiss; Shane F Strom
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-06

Review 4.  A challenge on Orthopedic Sciences: The Influence of Spinal Disease and Deformities on Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Review on Literature.

Authors:  Ali Yeganeh; Mehdi Moghtadaei; Mohsen Motalebi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-09

5.  Selection of spinal surgery and hip replacement sequence in patients with both degenerative scoliosis and hip disease.

Authors:  Haocong Zhang; Hailong Yu; Meng Zhang; Zijun Huang; Liangbi Xiang; Xinwei Liu; Zheng Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Hip and Lumbar Spine Physical Examination Findings in People Presenting With Low Back Pain, With or Without Lower Extremity Pain.

Authors:  Heidi Prather; Abby Cheng; Karen Steger-May; Vaibhav Maheshwari; Linda Van Dillen
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Association of global sagittal spinal deformity with functional disability two years after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yoshinori Okamoto; Hitoshi Wakama; Tomohiro Okayoshi; Shuhei Otsuki; Masashi Neo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.