Literature DB >> 33464969

Does it matter if a story character lives or dies?: a message experiment comparing survivor and death narratives.

Helen M Lillie1, Manusheela Pokharel2, Kevin K John3, Katheryn R Christy4, Sean Upshaw5, Elizabeth A Giorgi1, Jakob D Jensen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In narratives, characters often face threats where they either live (survivor narratives) or die (death narratives). Both outcomes have the potential to persuade, and are frequently utilised in mass communication campaigns, yet more research is needed examining the relative effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of each strategy.
DESIGN: U.S. adults (N = 1010) were randomly assigned to a 2 (survivor, death) × 2 (non-foreshadowed, foreshadowed) × 2 (within-study replication: narrative 1, narrative 2) between-participants experiment with melanoma stories as stimuli. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intentions to engage in sun safe behaviour and skin self-examination behaviour were assessed in the pre- and posttest, and then transformed into change scores.
RESULTS: Death narratives increased sun safe behaviour intentions. Consistent with the entertainment overcoming resistance model, foreshadowed death narratives were found to increase sun safe behaviour intentions via increased transportation and decreased counterarguing.
CONCLUSION: Compared to survivor narratives, death narratives increase intentions to engage in sun safe behaviour. The findings offer support for character death as a key feature of narrative persuasion, and narrative transportation and counterarguing as important mediational pathways.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Survivor; counterarguing; death; melanoma; narrative; narrative transportation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33464969      PMCID: PMC8286982          DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1873337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Health        ISSN: 0887-0446


  36 in total

1.  Fear, threat, and perceptions of efficacy from frightening skin cancer messages.

Authors:  M T Stephenson; K Witte
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  1998

Review 2.  A model of the precaution adoption process: evidence from home radon testing.

Authors:  N D Weinstein; P M Sandman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

4.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

6.  All stories are not alike: a purpose-, content-, and valence-based taxonomy of patient narratives in decision aids.

Authors:  Victoria A Shaffer; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Changing health-promoting behaviours through narrative interventions: A systematic review.

Authors:  Marie-Josée Perrier; Kathleen A Martin Ginis
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2016-07-07

8.  The use of gain- or loss-frame messages and efficacy appeals to dissuade excessive alcohol consumption among college students: a test of psychological reactance theory.

Authors:  Brian L Quick; Benjamin R Bates
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010-09

9.  Prevalence and correlates of sun protection and skin self-examination practices among cutaneous malignant melanoma survivors.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Stuart Lessin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-07-20

Review 10.  Cancer risk elicitation and communication: lessons from the psychology of risk perception.

Authors:  William M P Klein; Michael E Stefanek
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  2 in total

1.  Death Narratives, Negative Emotion, and Counterarguing: Testing Fear, Anger, and Sadness as Mechanisms of Effect.

Authors:  Helen M Lillie; Jakob D Jensen; Manusheela Pokharel; Sean J Upshaw
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2021-09-27

2.  Intention to Screen for Hepatitis C Among University Students: Influence of Different Communicative Scenarios.

Authors:  Pierluigi Diotaiuti; Stefania Mancone; Lavinia Falese; Maria Ferrara; Fernando Bellizzi; Giuseppe Valente; Stefano Corrado; Francesco Misiti
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.435

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.