Literature DB >> 33464743

Avoiding the Virtual Pitfall: Identifying and Mitigating Biases in Graduate Medical Education Videoconference Interviews.

Jyothi Marbin1, Y-Vonne Hutchinson2, Sarah Schaeffer3.   

Abstract

Public health concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic are leading many residency and fellowship programs to transition from in-person to videoconference interviews (VCIs). The magnitude and speed of the shift to VCIs, the lack of existing research around bias and VCIs, and the underlying stress on all involved related to the pandemic put programs at risk of implementing virtual interviews without fully exploring their implications for diversity and equity. VCIs can promote diversity efforts by reducing the need for travel, making interviews more convenient and cost effective for applicants. However, VCIs may also introduce new biases and amplify existing biases in recruitment. VCIs introduce a dependence on technology to conduct the interview process, which may amplify systemic inequities in access to broadband internet and high-quality hardware. Communication delays due to technology challenges may negatively affect interview scores. Additionally, users experience increased cognitive load when participating in videoconferences, which can activate implicit biases. Exposure to cues in the interviewee's personal living situation previously unavailable to interviewers may lead to unconscious assumptions by interviewers, which may also influence scoring. Graduate medical education programs committed to maintaining equitable recruitment processes must be able to recognize potential biases in VCIs and implement strategies to mitigate them. This article identifies some of the biases VCIs can introduce to the recruitment process and offers strategies for programs to mitigate them. These include making interviewers aware of potential technology-based inequities, encouraging interviewers to minimize multitasking, and offering guidance on use of standardized backgrounds. The authors also recognize the limitations of offering behavioral strategies to mitigate systemic inequities and suggest that structural changes are needed to ensure equitable access to technology.
Copyright © 2021 by the Association of American Medical Colleges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33464743     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   7.840


  6 in total

1.  Evidence-Based Inclusive Graduate Medical Education Recruitment Strategies.

Authors:  Alda Maria Gonzaga; Jyothi Marbin; Kyla Terhune
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-02

2.  Black Physicians' Experiences with Anti-Black Racism in Healthcare Systems Explored Through An Attraction-Selection-Attrition Lens.

Authors:  Myia S Williams; Alyson K Myers; Kayla D Finuf; Vidhi H Patel; Lyndonna M Marrast; Renee Pekmezaris; Johanna Martinez
Journal:  J Bus Psychol       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  POINT: Should Fellowship Interviews Remain Exclusively Virtual? Yes.

Authors:  Başak Çoruh
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Money Matters: Anticipated Expense of In-Person Obstetrics and Gynecology Fellowship Interviews Has Greater Impact for Underrepresented in Medicine and Women Applicants.

Authors:  Christine A Heisler; Sylvia Botros-Brey; Hanzhang Wang; Ann Tran; Bertille Gaigbe-Togbe; Ava Leegant; Anne Hardart
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-08-04

5.  A single center evaluation of applicant experiences in virtual interviews across eight internal medicine subspecialty fellowship programs.

Authors:  Laura A Huppert; Gerald Hsu; Najwa Elnachef; Lynn Flint; James A Frank; Lianne S Gensler; Edward C Hsiao; Raman R Khanna; Atif Qasim; Brian S Schwartz; Eric Widera; Carly Zapata; Jennifer M Babik
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2021-12

6.  Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Interviews 2021: An Evolution in Process.

Authors:  Lisa J Rose-Jones; Mustafa M Ahmed; Benjamin H Freed; Andrew M Kates; Meera Kondapaneni; Jonathan R Salik; Victor Soukoulis; Helga Van Herle; Gaby Weissman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 27.203

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.