| Literature DB >> 33464277 |
Rahul A Jonas1,2, Camilla F Brandt3, Qi Zhang2, Ya X Wang2, Jost B Jonas2,3,4.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the spatial relationship between the locations of the parapapillary gamma zone and the fovea.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33464277 PMCID: PMC7817880 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.62.1.18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ISSN: 0146-0404 Impact factor: 4.799
Figure 1.Vertical OCT image of the optic nerve head in an eye with an inferior gamma zone (between A and B), a corresponding overhanging of Bruch's membrane into the intrapapillary compartment at the superior optic disc border (between C and D), and a fovea location 0.78 mm inferior to the optic disc horizontal.
Figure 2.Vertical OCT image (inferior image) of the optic nerve head in an eye with an inferior gamma zone (between A and B), a corresponding overhanging of Bruch's membrane into the intrapapillary compartment at the superior optic disc border (between C and D), an angle between the disc–fovea line and the horizontal of 23.25°, and a fovea location 1.50 mm inferior to the optic disc horizontal.
Figure 3.Vertical OCT image (inferior image) of the optic nerve head in an eye with an inferior gamma zone (between A and B), a corresponding overhanging of Bruch's membrane into the intrapapillary compartment at the superior optic disc border (between C and D), and a fovea location 1.1 mm inferior to the optic disc horizontal.
Morphometric Fundus Measurements Stratified by the Location of the Widest Parapapillary Gamma Zone in the Beijing Eye Study
| Mean ± SD | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruch's Membrane Opening Diameter | |||||||||
| Widest Gamma Zone |
| Age (y) | Axial Length (mm) | Horizontal (µm) | Vertical (µm) | Gamma Zone Width (µm) | Disc–Fovea Angle (°) | Disc–Fovea Distance (mm) | Fovea Vertical Distance (mm) |
| Inferior quadrant | 89 (43.8) | 61.1 ± 7.8 | 24.2 ± 1.5 | 1566 ± 248 | 1805 ± 226 | 317 ± 201 | 8.46 ± 4.37 | 4.93 ± 0.34 | 0.73 ± 0.33 |
| Temporal quadrant | 105 (51.7) | 62.1 ± 8.5 | 24.6 ± 1.4 | 1603 ± 214 | 1739 ± 223 | 319 ± 236 | 6.71 ± 3.46 | 4.95 ± 0.36 | 0.58 ± 0.30 |
| Superior quadrant | 5 (2.5) | 60.6 ± 6.5 | 24.1 ± 2.0 | 1610 ± 99 | 1599 ± 193 | 260 ± 130 | 6.13 ± 4.07 | 4.88 ± 0.28 | 0.53 ± 0.37 |
| Nasal quadrant | 4 (2.0) | 61.0 ± 7.5 | 23.1 ± 0.3 | 1456 ± 109 | 1911 ± 469 | 297 ± 252 | 8.53 ± 5.13 | 5.19 ± 0.14 | 0.77 ± 0.47 |
| Temporal, superior, or nasal quadrant | 114 (56.2) | 62.0 ± 8.3 | 24.5 ± 1.4 | 1597 ± 208 | 1564 ± 183 | 315 ± 232 | 6.75 ± 3.53 | 4.96 ± 0.35 | 0.58 ± 0.31 |
Figure 4.Graph showing the distribution of the disc–fovea angle (defined as the angle between the disc–fovea line and the horizontal) and the quadrant with the widest parapapillary gamma zone width.
Multivariate Regression Analysis of the Disc Fovea Angle to Multiple Parameters
|
| Standardized Correlation Coefficient (β) | Standardized Correlation Coefficient Squared (β2) | Non-Standardized Correlation Coefficient ( | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disc–fovea-angle associated with ( | |||||
| Inferior gamma zone location | 0.001 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 1.80 | 0.72, 2.88 |
| Age (y) | 0.008 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.02, 0.16 |
| When added separately to the model | |||||
| Gender (male/female) | 0.37 | 0.06 | 0.004 | 0.50 | –0.60, 1.60 |
| Region of habitation (rural/urban) | 0.07 | –0.13 | 0.02 | –1.06 | –2.19, 0.08 |
| Level of education (1–5) | 0.25 | –0.08 | 0.006 | –0.33 | –0.89, 0.23 |
| Axial length (mm) | 0.66 | 0.03 | 0.0009 | 0.09 | –0.30, 0.48 |
| Bruch's membrane opening diameter (µm) | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.006 | 0.001 | –0.001, 0.004 |
| Disc–fovea distance (mm) | 0.11 | –0.11 | 0.01 | –1.28 | −2.83, 0.28 |
| Fundus tessellation degree (0–3) | 0.46 | 0.06 | 0.004 | 0.30 | –0.50, 1.11 |
| Subfoveal choroidal thickness (µm) | 0.25 | –0.09 | 0.008 | –0.004 | –0.009, 0.002 |
| Vertical fovea distance from the optic disc horizontal associated with ( | |||||
| Inferior gamma zone location | 0.001 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0,07, 0.26 |
| Gamma zone width (µm) | 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.000 | 0,00, 0.00 |
| When added separately to the model | |||||
| Age (y) | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.005 | –0.001, 0.011 |
| Gender (male/female) | 0.75 | 0.02 | 0.0004 | 0.015 | –0.079, 0.109 |
| Region of habitation (rural/urban) | 0.29 | –0.08 | 0.006 | –0.05 | –0.15, 0.05 |
| Level of education (1–5) | 0.72 | –0.03 | 0.0009 | –0.01 | –0.07, 0.05 |
| Axial length (mm) | 0.96 | 0.005 | 0.00003 | 0.001 | –0.04, 0.05 |
| Bruch's membrane opening diameter (µm) | 0.51 | 0.05 | 0.003 | 0.00007 | 0.000, 0.000 |
| Disc–fovea distance (mm) | 0.62 | –0.04 | 0.002 | −0.04 | –0.18, 0.11 |
| Fundus tessellation degree (0–3) | 0.32 | 0.08 | 0.006 | 0.04 | –0.04, 0.11 |
| Subfoveal choroidal thickness (µm) | 0.33 | –0.08 | 0.006 | 0.000 | –0.001, 0.000 |
Figure 5.Graph showing the distribution of the vertical distance of the fovea from a horizontal line drawn through the optic disc center and the quadrant with the widest parapapillary gamma zone width.