Literature DB >> 33463906

Designing and analyzing clinical trials for personalized medicine via Bayesian models.

Chuanwu Zhang1,2, Matthew S Mayo1, Jo A Wick1, Byron J Gajewski1.   

Abstract

Patients with different characteristics (e.g., biomarkers, risk factors) may have different responses to the same medicine. Personalized medicine clinical studies that are designed to identify patient subgroup treatment efficacies can benefit patients and save medical resources. However, subgroup treatment effect identification complicates the study design in consideration of desired operating characteristics. We investigate three Bayesian adaptive models for subgroup treatment effect identification: pairwise independent, hierarchical, and cluster hierarchical achieved via Dirichlet Process (DP). The impact of interim analysis and longitudinal data modeling on the personalized medicine study design is also explored. Interim analysis is considered since they can accelerate personalized medicine studies in cases where early stopping rules for success or futility are met. We apply integrated two-component prediction method (ITP) for longitudinal data simulation, and simple linear regression for longitudinal data imputation to optimize the study design. The designs' performance in terms of power for the subgroup treatment effects and overall treatment effect, sample size, and study duration are investigated via simulation. We found the hierarchical model is an optimal approach to identifying subgroup treatment effects, and the cluster hierarchical model is an excellent alternative approach in cases where sufficient information is not available for specifying the priors. The interim analysis introduction to the study design lead to the trade-off between power and expected sample size via the adjustment of the early stopping criteria. The introduction of the longitudinal modeling slightly improves the power. These findings can be applied to future personalized medicine studies with discrete or time-to-event endpoints.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian (cluster) hierarchical model; Dirichlet process; integrated two component prediction; interim analysis; longitudinal modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33463906      PMCID: PMC8084911          DOI: 10.1002/pst.2095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  26 in total

Review 1.  General guidance on exploratory and confirmatory subgroup analysis in late-stage clinical trials.

Authors:  Alex Dmitrienko; Christoph Muysers; Arno Fritsch; Ilya Lipkovich
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Adaptive enrichment with subpopulation selection at interim: methodologies, applications and design considerations.

Authors:  Sue-Jane Wang; H M James Hung
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Random forests of interaction trees for estimating individualized treatment effects in randomized trials.

Authors:  Xiaogang Su; Annette T Peña; Lei Liu; Richard A Levine
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Detecting qualitative interaction: a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Emine Ozgür Bayman; Kathryn Chaloner; Mary Kathryn Cowles
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Subgroup identification based on differential effect search--a recursive partitioning method for establishing response to treatment in patient subpopulations.

Authors:  Ilya Lipkovich; Alex Dmitrienko; Jonathan Denne; Gregory Enas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Adaptive enrichment designs for clinical trials.

Authors:  Noah Simon; Richard Simon
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Group sequential designs with prospectively planned rules for subpopulation enrichment.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Brandon Luber; Richard E Thompson; Daniel Hanley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Tutorial on statistical considerations on subgroup analysis in confirmatory clinical trials.

Authors:  Mohamed Alosh; Mohammad F Huque; Frank Bretz; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  A method to estimate treatment efficacy among latent subgroups of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Lily L Altstein; Gang Li; Robert M Elashoff
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Patient Assisted Intervention for Neuropathy: Comparison of Treatment in Real Life Situations (PAIN-CONTRoLS): Bayesian Adaptive Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Richard J Barohn; Byron Gajewski; Mamatha Pasnoor; Alexandra Brown; Laura L Herbelin; Kim S Kimminau; Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam; Omar Jawdat; Mazen M Dimachkie; Stanley Iyadurai; Amro Stino; John Kissel; Robert Pascuzzi; Thomas Brannagan; Matthew Wicklund; Aiesha Ahmed; David Walk; Gordon Smith; Dianna Quan; Darryl Heitzman; Alejandro Tobon; Shafeeq Ladha; Gil Wolfe; Michael Pulley; Ghazala Hayat; Yuebing Li; Pariwat Thaisetthawatkul; Richard Lewis; Suur Biliciler; Khema Sharma; Kian Salajegheh; Jaya Trivedi; William Mallonee; Ted Burns; Mark Jacoby; Vera Bril; Tuan Vu; Sindhu Ramchandren; Mark Bazant; Sara Austin; Chafic Karam; Yessar Hussain; Christen Kutz; Paul Twydell; Stephen Scelsa; Hani Kushlaf; James Wymer; Michael Hehir; Noah Kolb; Jeffrey Ralph; Alexandru Barboi; Navin Verma; Moiz Ahmed; Anza Memon; David Saperstein; Jau-Shin Lou; Andrea Swenson; Tiyonnoh Cash
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 18.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.