Literature DB >> 29707855

Random forests of interaction trees for estimating individualized treatment effects in randomized trials.

Xiaogang Su1, Annette T Peña1, Lei Liu2, Richard A Levine3.   

Abstract

Assessing heterogeneous treatment effects is a growing interest in advancing precision medicine. Individualized treatment effects (ITEs) play a critical role in such an endeavor. Concerning experimental data collected from randomized trials, we put forward a method, termed random forests of interaction trees (RFIT), for estimating ITE on the basis of interaction trees. To this end, we propose a smooth sigmoid surrogate method, as an alternative to greedy search, to speed up tree construction. The RFIT outperforms the "separate regression" approach in estimating ITE. Furthermore, standard errors for the estimated ITE via RFIT are obtained with the infinitesimal jackknife method. We assess and illustrate the use of RFIT via both simulation and the analysis of data from an acupuncture headache trial.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  individualized treatment effects; infinitesimal jackknife; precision medicine; random forests; treatment-by-covariate interaction

Year:  2018        PMID: 29707855      PMCID: PMC6028297          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  14 in total

1.  MissForest--non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data.

Authors:  Daniel J Stekhoven; Peter Bühlmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Biomarker: Predictive or Prognostic?

Authors:  Karla V Ballman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.

Authors:  Jared C Foster; Jeremy M G Taylor; Stephen J Ruberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Tutorial in biostatistics: data-driven subgroup identification and analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  Ilya Lipkovich; Alex Dmitrienko; Ralph B
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Estimation and Accuracy after Model Selection.

Authors:  Bradley Efron
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Tree-based methods for individualized treatment regimes.

Authors:  E B Laber; Y Q Zhao
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  A regression tree approach to identifying subgroups with differential treatment effects.

Authors:  Wei-Yin Loh; Xu He; Michael Man
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Qualitative interaction trees: a tool to identify qualitative treatment-subgroup interactions.

Authors:  Elise Dusseldorp; Iven Van Mechelen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes from a Classification Perspective.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Eric Laber
Journal:  Stat       Date:  2012-01-01

10.  Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  7 in total

1.  A permutation procedure to detect heterogeneous treatment effects in randomized clinical trials while controlling the type I error rate.

Authors:  Jack M Wolf; Joseph S Koopmeiners; David M Vock
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.599

2.  Case-only trees and random forests for exploring genotype-specific treatment effects in randomized clinical trials with dichotomous endpoints.

Authors:  James Y Dai; Michael LeBlanc
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 1.864

3.  Designing and analyzing clinical trials for personalized medicine via Bayesian models.

Authors:  Chuanwu Zhang; Matthew S Mayo; Jo A Wick; Byron J Gajewski
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 1.894

4.  Polygenic modelling of treatment effect heterogeneity.

Authors:  Zhi Ming Xu; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  A flexible approach to identify interaction effects between moderators in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinru Li; Elise Dusseldorp; Jacqueline J Meulman
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 5.273

6.  Predicting mortality in hemodialysis patients using machine learning analysis.

Authors:  Victoria Garcia-Montemayor; Alejandro Martin-Malo; Carlo Barbieri; Francesco Bellocchio; Sagrario Soriano; Victoria Pendon-Ruiz de Mier; Ignacio R Molina; Pedro Aljama; Mariano Rodriguez
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2020-08-11

7.  Diversity Forests: Using Split Sampling to Enable Innovative Complex Split Procedures in Random Forests.

Authors:  Roman Hornung
Journal:  SN Comput Sci       Date:  2021-10-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.