Literature DB >> 33463617

Confounding factors influencing the scroll width of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft.

Mohit Parekh1, Stefano Ferrari2, Luca Pagano3, Martina Angi4, Kunal A Gadhvi3, Vito Romano3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33463617      PMCID: PMC7933887          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2642_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, New challenges have emerged with increasing interest in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft preparation and transplantation. Multiple studies report confounding factors that influence scrolling and un-scrolling of DMEK graft, which is one of the crucial factors determining the success rate of a DMEK transplant. Some of these factors are reported as follows – Endothelial cell count and type of surgical manipulation. Descemet's membrane (DM), as a product of corneal endothelial cells, has been reported to be thicker in donors with high endothelial cell counts (ECC), thus contributing toward the unfolding time by making the tissue scroll tighter. In fact, in recent studies, spontaneous unfolding of the graft has been reported with pre-ECC of 2500-2800 cells/mm2; pre-loaded tissue with endothelium inward transplanted using bi-manual pull-through technique[1] compared to a longer unfolding time (5.4 minutes) with pre-ECC of 2900 cells/mm2; loaded with endothelium inward and transplanted immediately without additional storage.[2] This suggests that ECC or the method of storage and transplantation could influence graft unfolding time inside the recipient eye. In our previous report, we observed approximately 4% endothelial cell loss (ECL) when a pre-loaded DMEK graft was stored for 20-96 hours.[3] This manipulation influences the ECC and may also affect the DMEK scroll tendency especially from pre-loaded tissues compared with surgeon prepared grafts. Age of donors. Tissues from young donors have been found to scroll tighter than the old aged donors (>60 years of age).[4] Tissue storage media and conditions. Type (hypothermic or organ culture), composition, storage temperature, days and in particular, storing DMEK tissues at higher temperature have shown increased scroll width.[5] Composition of DM. In relation to tissue's elastic properties, impact of storage media and conditions of collagen and elastin in the banded and non-banded zones of DM has also been reported to have an impeding effect on DMEK scrolling and unscrolling.[6] Speed of peeling. DMEK graft, when peeled slowly has shown to reduce the chance of tighter scrolls but increases ECL.[7] Recipient factors. Small or shallow anterior chamber, aphakic eyes, previous posterior segment surgery or interference due to implanted devices like intraocular lens or a glaucoma tube have also been reported.[8] Other eye bank factors: In our experience, we have observed that donor variability, characteristics and tissue manipulation in the eye bank may also account toward the unfolding time. Limited literature and studies describe the scrolling and unscrolling/unfolding of the DMEK graft. Therefore, in order to further optimize DMEK surgery, it would be important to collect and report information like donor data such as pre-transplant ECC and age; tissue characteristics such as diameter of the graft, storage methods and conditions including the device used for pre-prepared DMEK grafts and; surgical considerations such as devices, methods of transplantation and recipient's anterior chamber status.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  8 in total

1.  Endothelium-in Versus Endothelium-out Insertion With Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Marianne O Price; Marek Lisek; Meagan Kelley; Matthew T Feng; Francis W Price
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Intraocular graft unfolding techniques in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Vasilios S Liarakos; Isabel Dapena; Lisanne Ham; Korine van Dijk; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: why does the donor tissue roll?

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Allison Jarstad; Yousuf M Khalifa
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Clinical Outcomes of Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts With Endothelium Tri-Folded Inwards.

Authors:  Massimo Busin; Pia Leon; Sergio D'Angelo; Alessandro Ruzza; Stefano Ferrari; Diego Ponzin; Mohit Parekh
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  The Influence of Speed During Stripping in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue Preparation.

Authors:  Davide Borroni; Kunal Gadhvi; Gabriela Wojcik; Flavia Pennisi; Neeru A Vallabh; Alessandra Galeone; Alessandro Ruzza; Esmaeil Arbabi; Nardine Menassa; Stephen Kaye; Diego Ponzin; Stefano Ferrari; Vito Romano
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Impact of Donor Age on Corneal Endothelium-Descemet Membrane Layer Scroll Formation.

Authors:  Adam Bennett; Shahira Mahmoud; Donna Drury; H Dwight Cavanagh; James P McCulley; W Matthew Petroll; V Vinod Mootha
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.018

7.  Preloaded Tissues for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Mohit Parekh; Alessandro Ruzza; Stefano Ferrari; Massimo Busin; Diego Ponzin
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Effects of temperature and fluid media on the scroll width size of the Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) donor graft.

Authors:  Ellen H Koo; Allen O Eghrari; Ryan S Meshkin; Wei Shi; William J Feuer; Karen G DeMarco; Arthur C Kurz
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-01
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study.

Authors:  Vito Romano; Mohit Parekh; Ahmed Kazaili; Bernhard Steger; Riaz Akhtar; Stefano Ferrari; Stephen B Kaye; Hannah J Levis
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.969

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.