Mohit Parekh1, Alessandro Ruzza2, Stefano Ferrari2, Massimo Busin3, Diego Ponzin2. 1. International Center for Ocular Physiopathology, Fondazione Banca Degli Occhi Del Veneto Onlus, Venice, Italy. Electronic address: mohit.parekh@fbov.it. 2. International Center for Ocular Physiopathology, Fondazione Banca Degli Occhi Del Veneto Onlus, Venice, Italy. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Villa Igea Hospital, Forli, Italy.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To determine the feasibility of preloading endothelial tissues for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). DESIGN: Laboratory investigation. METHODS: setting: Institutional. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty human donor corneas unsuitable for transplantation with endothelial cell density in a range of 1600-2700 cells/mm(2). INTERVENTION: The endothelium was punched, stripped (8.5 mm diameter) and manually tri-folded with the endothelial side inward. The excised membranes were gently moved in a 2.2 intraocular lens (IOL) cartridge and pulled further in the funnel using 25 G end-grasping forceps. The cartridge was filled with transport media (TM) (sealed at its funnel and back entrance with a stopper) and the tissue was preserved for 4 days at room temperature in the bottles containing TM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success rate of preparation, processing time, endothelial cell loss (ECL), and active metabolism. RESULTS: The tissues were peeled and loaded successfully in all cases. Average stripping and loading time was 20 and 4.5 minutes, respectively. ECL after preservation was 4.35% with 3.55% (± 5.89%) mortality and 7.80% (± 14.12%) uncovered areas. A total of 0.55 (± 0.26) mg/mL of glucose was consumed by the cells showing active metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: Tri-folded (endothelium-in) DMEK grafts can be preloaded using TM in an IOL cartridge and stored up to 4 days with limited endothelial damage. Direct injection of TM should be avoided because of the presence of bovine serum, but the tissue can be washed using balanced salt solution and gently injected. Alternatively, the graft can be easily delivered using a bimanual pull-through technique. Preloading DMEK grafts will simplify the surgery with reproducibility, reduced surgical time, and reduced tissue wastage, cost, and logistical requirements.
INTRODUCTION: To determine the feasibility of preloading endothelial tissues for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). DESIGN: Laboratory investigation. METHODS: setting: Institutional. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty humandonor corneas unsuitable for transplantation with endothelial cell density in a range of 1600-2700 cells/mm(2). INTERVENTION: The endothelium was punched, stripped (8.5 mm diameter) and manually tri-folded with the endothelial side inward. The excised membranes were gently moved in a 2.2 intraocular lens (IOL) cartridge and pulled further in the funnel using 25 G end-grasping forceps. The cartridge was filled with transport media (TM) (sealed at its funnel and back entrance with a stopper) and the tissue was preserved for 4 days at room temperature in the bottles containing TM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success rate of preparation, processing time, endothelial cell loss (ECL), and active metabolism. RESULTS: The tissues were peeled and loaded successfully in all cases. Average stripping and loading time was 20 and 4.5 minutes, respectively. ECL after preservation was 4.35% with 3.55% (± 5.89%) mortality and 7.80% (± 14.12%) uncovered areas. A total of 0.55 (± 0.26) mg/mL of glucose was consumed by the cells showing active metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: Tri-folded (endothelium-in) DMEK grafts can be preloaded using TM in an IOL cartridge and stored up to 4 days with limited endothelial damage. Direct injection of TM should be avoided because of the presence of bovine serum, but the tissue can be washed using balanced salt solution and gently injected. Alternatively, the graft can be easily delivered using a bimanual pull-through technique. Preloading DMEK grafts will simplify the surgery with reproducibility, reduced surgical time, and reduced tissue wastage, cost, and logistical requirements.
Authors: Kali Barnes; Eric Chiang; Conan Chen; John Lohmeier; Jason Christy; Akash Chaurasia; Allison Rosen; Parth Vora; Stephanie Cai; Anshul Subramanya; Nicholas Durr; Robert Allen; Allen Omid Eghrari Journal: Cornea Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Jason Hooton; Kyeong Hwan Kim; Stephen I Lentz; Nicholas Hicks; Kayla Jones; Kristen McCoy; Shahzad I Mian Journal: Cornea Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Annekatrin Rickmann; Karl Boden; Silke Wahl; Andre Trouvain; Andre Schulz; Peter Szurman Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2021-10-21 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Meraf A Wolle; David L DeMill; Lauren Johnson; Stephen I Lentz; Maria A Woodward; Shahzad I Mian Journal: Cornea Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Kevin W Ross; Christopher G Stoeger; George O D Rosenwasser; Robert C OʼBrien; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Beth Ann Benetz; Patricia Dahl; Donna C Drury; Steven P Dunn; Sameera M Farazdaghi; Caroline K Hoover; Marian S Macsai; Shahzad I Mian; Michael L Nordlund; Jeffrey G Penta; Mark C Soper; Mark A Terry; David D Verdier; Doyce V Williams; Jonathan H Lass Journal: Cornea Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 3.152
Authors: Vito Romano; Mohit Parekh; Alessandro Ruzza; Colin E Willoughby; Stefano Ferrari; Diego Ponzin; Stephen B Kaye; Hannah J Levis Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Ellen H Koo; Allen O Eghrari; Ryan S Meshkin; Wei Shi; William J Feuer; Karen G DeMarco; Arthur C Kurz Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2017-09-01