| Literature DB >> 33457280 |
Khatereh Aminoltejari1, Peter C Black1.
Abstract
Radical cystectomy (RC) with urinary diversion is considered the standard treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). As one of the most challenging surgical techniques performed by urologists, RC was described many decades ago, and yet patient morbidity rates have remained stagnant over the years. This review outlines the most recent indications and techniques for RC and analyses the current landscape of complications after cystectomy. There is significant room for improvement with respect to both oncologic and functional outcomes after RC. Future efforts will need to focus on unifying reporting methodology, optimal patient selection criteria, enhanced surgical techniques and peri-operative care pathways, and technological advances to improve patient outcomes. 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: Complications; pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND); radical cystectomy (RC); urothelial carcinoma of bladder
Year: 2020 PMID: 33457280 PMCID: PMC7807330 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.23
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Androl Urol ISSN: 2223-4683
Figure 1Upon diagnosis of non-metastatic, muscle-invasive bladder cancer, the recommendation is for patients to undergo neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Surgery alone is offered to patients ineligible for or declining NAC, radical cystectomy (with possible adjuvant chemotherapy). Trimodal therapy (TMT), as part of a bladder-preserving approach, is another option for select patients. However, if TMT fails, radical cystectomy remains an option for salvage therapy. This figure has been adapted from the AUA guidelines for MIBC therapy (2). *, Option for patients with solitary tumors 5 cm, absence of hydronephrosis, absence of extensive CIS, good bladder function, or patients who are unfit for or declining cystectomy. #, Cis or MMC/5FU = cisplatin or mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil.