Literature DB >> 15758789

Health related quality of life after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer: a systematic review and critical analysis of the literature.

Michael P Porter1, David F Penson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Continent forms of urinary diversion have become a gold standard of urinary tract reconstruction after radical cystectomy, based mostly on the premise of improved quality of life. It is unclear whether the existing body of literature supports this assumption.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review to determine if differences exist in health related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes among different types of urinary diversion after radical cystectomy. A MEDLINE search was performed inclusive of the dates 1966 to January 2004. Inclusion criteria included adult patients, patients with bladder cancer, comparative studies, original research, primary study outcome related to quality of life, and use of a quality of life instrument to measure outcomes. Only studies comparing neobladder, continent reservoir, or conduit diversion were included.
RESULTS: Of 378 initial articles 15 studies met all inclusion criteria. None of the studies were randomized trials. Only 1 study was prospective. Of 15 studies 10 (67%) used some type of previously validated HRQOL instrument, 10 (67%) used some form of ad hoc instrument, 11 (73%) used bladder cancer disease specific instruments, while 9 (60%) used general instruments. Only 1 of the bladder cancer specific instruments had been previously validated. Common limitations included unvalidated HRQOL instruments, use of general HRQOL instruments only, lack of baseline data, cross- sectional analysis, and retrospective study design.
CONCLUSIONS: To date, the current body of published literature is insufficient to conclude that 1 form of urinary diversion is superior to another based on HRQOL outcomes. Future studies should attempt to incorporate prospective data collection, longer term followup and validated disease specific HRQOL instruments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15758789     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000149080.82697.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  53 in total

1.  Patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a prospective case-control study.

Authors:  Catharina A Goossens-Laan; Paul J M Kil; J L H Ruud Bosch; Jolanda De Vries
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Surgery: preserving continence in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Anthony Costello; Rajiv Goel
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Determining when to recommend continent urinary diversion.

Authors:  Scott M Gilbert; James E Montie
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between ileal conduit diversion and orthotopic neobladder based on validated questionnaires: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hangchuan Shi; Han Yu; Joaquim Bellmunt; Jeffrey J Leow; Xuanyu Chen; Changcheng Guo; Hongmei Yang; Xiaoping Zhang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion for neurogenic LUTS: current indications.

Authors:  Kamran P Sajadi; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Current status of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Faris Azzouni
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Bladder Cancer Survivorship.

Authors:  Sumeet K Bhanvadia
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Comparison of readmission and short-term mortality rates between different types of urinary diversion in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Bruno Nahar; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Feng Miao; Nachiketh Soodana Prakash; Vivek Venkatramani; Aliyah Gauri; David Alonzo; Mahmoud Alameddine; Sanjaya Swain; Sanoj Punnen; Chad Ritch; Dipen J Parekh; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Healthcare economics of bladder cancer: cost-enhancing and cost-reducing factors.

Authors:  Katia Noyes; Eric A Singer; Edward M Messing
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Urinary diversion practice patterns among certifying American urologists.

Authors:  Jonathan L Silberstein; Stephen A Poon; Alexandra C Maschino; William T Lowrance; Tullika Garg; Harry W Herr; S Machele Donat; Guido Dalbagni; Bernard H Bochner; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.