K Tang1, D Xia1, H Li1, W Guan1, X Guo1, Z Hu1, X Ma2, X Zhang2, H Xu3, Z Ye1. 1. Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. 2. Department of Urology, PLA General Hospital, Military Postgraduate Medical College, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. Electronic address: xuhua@mail.hust.edu.cn.
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC) in the treatment of bladder cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Embase databases and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify studies that compared RARC and ORC and were published up to December 2012. Outcomes of interest included demographic and clinical characteristics, perioperative, pathologic variables and complications. RESULTS: Although there was a significant difference in the operating time in favor of ORC (WMD: 70.69 min; p < 0.001), patients having RARC might benefit from significantly fewer total complications (OR: 0.54; p < 0.001), less blood loss (WMD: -599.03 ml; p < 0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (WMD: -4.56 d; p < 0.001), lower blood transfusion rate (OR: 0.13; p = 0.002), less transfusion needs (WMD: -2.14 units; p < 0.001), shorter time to regular diet (WMD: -1.57 d; p = 0.002), more lymph node yield (WMD: 2.18 n; p = 0.001) and fewer positive lymph node (OR: 0.64; p = 0.03). There was no significant difference between the RARC and ORC regarding positive surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: In early experience, our data suggest that RARC appears to be a safe, feasible and minimally invasive alternative to its open counterpart when performed by experienced surgeons in selected patients.
AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC) in the treatment of bladder cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Embase databases and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify studies that compared RARC and ORC and were published up to December 2012. Outcomes of interest included demographic and clinical characteristics, perioperative, pathologic variables and complications. RESULTS: Although there was a significant difference in the operating time in favor of ORC (WMD: 70.69 min; p < 0.001), patients having RARC might benefit from significantly fewer total complications (OR: 0.54; p < 0.001), less blood loss (WMD: -599.03 ml; p < 0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (WMD: -4.56 d; p < 0.001), lower blood transfusion rate (OR: 0.13; p = 0.002), less transfusion needs (WMD: -2.14 units; p < 0.001), shorter time to regular diet (WMD: -1.57 d; p = 0.002), more lymph node yield (WMD: 2.18 n; p = 0.001) and fewer positive lymph node (OR: 0.64; p = 0.03). There was no significant difference between the RARC and ORC regarding positive surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: In early experience, our data suggest that RARC appears to be a safe, feasible and minimally invasive alternative to its open counterpart when performed by experienced surgeons in selected patients.
Authors: Jeffrey J Leow; Jens Bedke; Karim Chamie; Justin W Collins; Siamak Daneshmand; Petros Grivas; Axel Heidenreich; Edward M Messing; Trevor J Royce; Alexander I Sankin; Mark P Schoenberg; William U Shipley; Arnauld Villers; Jason A Efstathiou; Joaquim Bellmunt; Arnulf Stenzl Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Bhavan Prasad Rai; Jasper Bondad; Nikhil Vasdev; Jim Adshead; Tim Lane; Kamran Ahmed; Mohammed S Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Khurshid Guru; Piotr L Chlosta; Omar M Aboumarzouk Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-04-24
Authors: Antonio Cusano; Peter Haddock; Max Jackson; Ilene Staff; Joseph Wagner; Anoop Meraney Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2016 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.541