Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman1,2, Julia M Dixon3, Taylor Burkholder4, Jennifer L Pigoga5, Michael Lee5,6, Shaheem de Vries6, Kubendhren Moodley6, Maxene Meier7, Kathryn Colborn8, Chandni Patel3, Lee A Wallis5,6. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E 17th Ave, Room 2612, MS C326, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Nee-Kofi.Mould-Millman@ucdenver.edu. 2. Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Department of Surgery, Cape Town, South Africa. Nee-Kofi.Mould-Millman@ucdenver.edu. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E 17th Ave, Room 2612, MS C326, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. 4. University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA. 5. Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Department of Surgery, Cape Town, South Africa. 6. Western Cape Government, Department of Health, Emergency Medical Services, Cape Town, South Africa. 7. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. 8. Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The South African Triage Scale (SATS) is a validated in-hospital triage tool that has been innovatively adopted for use in the prehospital setting by Western Cape Government (WCG) Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in South Africa. The performance of SATS by EMS providers has not been formally assessed. The study sought to assess the validity and reliability of SATS when used by WCG EMS prehospital providers for single-patient triage. METHODS: This is a prospective, assessment-based validation study among WCG EMS providers from March to September 2017 in Cape Town, South Africa. Participants completed an assessment containing 50 clinical vignettes by calculating the three components - triage early warning score (TEWS), discriminators (pre-defined clinical conditions), and a final SATS triage color. Responses were scored against gold standard answers. Validity was assessed by calculating over- and under-triage rates compared to gold standard. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by calculating agreement among EMS providers' responses. RESULTS: A total of 102 EMS providers completed the assessment. The final SATS triage color was accurately determined in 56.5%, under-triaged in 29.5%, and over-triaged in 13.1% of vignette responses. TEWS was calculated correctly in 42.6% of vignettes, under-calculated in 45.0% and over-calculated in 10.9%. Discriminators were correctly identified in only 58.8% of vignettes. There was substantial inter-rater and gold standard agreement for both the TEWS component and final SATS color, but there was lower inter-rater agreement for clinical discriminators. CONCLUSION: This is the first assessment of SATS as used by EMS providers for prehospital triage. We found that SATS generally under-performed as a triage tool, mainly due to the clinical discriminators. We found good inter-rater reliability, but poor validity. The under-triage rate of 30% was higher than previous reports from the in-hospital setting. The over-triage rate of 13% was acceptable. Further clinically-based and qualitative studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
BACKGROUND: The South African Triage Scale (SATS) is a validated in-hospital triage tool that has been innovatively adopted for use in the prehospital setting by Western Cape Government (WCG) Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in South Africa. The performance of SATS by EMS providers has not been formally assessed. The study sought to assess the validity and reliability of SATS when used by WCG EMS prehospital providers for single-patient triage. METHODS: This is a prospective, assessment-based validation study among WCG EMS providers from March to September 2017 in Cape Town, South Africa. Participants completed an assessment containing 50 clinical vignettes by calculating the three components - triage early warning score (TEWS), discriminators (pre-defined clinical conditions), and a final SATS triage color. Responses were scored against gold standard answers. Validity was assessed by calculating over- and under-triage rates compared to gold standard. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by calculating agreement among EMS providers' responses. RESULTS: A total of 102 EMS providers completed the assessment. The final SATS triage color was accurately determined in 56.5%, under-triaged in 29.5%, and over-triaged in 13.1% of vignette responses. TEWS was calculated correctly in 42.6% of vignettes, under-calculated in 45.0% and over-calculated in 10.9%. Discriminators were correctly identified in only 58.8% of vignettes. There was substantial inter-rater and gold standard agreement for both the TEWS component and final SATS color, but there was lower inter-rater agreement for clinical discriminators. CONCLUSION: This is the first assessment of SATS as used by EMS providers for prehospital triage. We found that SATS generally under-performed as a triage tool, mainly due to the clinical discriminators. We found good inter-rater reliability, but poor validity. The under-triage rate of 30% was higher than previous reports from the in-hospital setting. The over-triage rate of 13% was acceptable. Further clinically-based and qualitative studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
Entities:
Keywords:
EMS; Prehospital; SATS; South Africa triage scale; Triage
Authors: Alexander Jenson; Bhakti Hansoti; Richard Rothman; Sarah S de Ramirez; Katie Lobner; Lee Wallis Journal: Eur J Emerg Med Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.799
Authors: Binoy Mistry; Sarah Stewart De Ramirez; Gabor Kelen; Paulo S K Schmitz; Kamna S Balhara; Scott Levin; Diego Martinez; Kevin Psoter; Xavier Anton; Jeremiah S Hinson Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2017-11-24 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Scott M Sasser; Richard C Hunt; Mark Faul; David Sugerman; William S Pearson; Theresa Dulski; Marlena M Wald; Gregory J Jurkovich; Craig D Newgard; E Brooke Lerner Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2012-01-13
Authors: Christopher M B Fernandes; Shelley McLeod; Joel Krause; Amit Shah; Justine Jewell; Barbara Smith; Lorraine Rollins Journal: CJEM Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.410
Authors: Mohammed Khan Dalwai; Michele Twomey; Jacob Maikere; Shujaat Said; Muhammed Wakeel; Jean-Paul Jemmy; Pola Valles; Katie Tayler-Smith; Lee Wallis; Rony Zachariah Journal: S Afr Med J Date: 2014-03-26
Authors: Temmy Sunyoto; Rafael Van den Bergh; Pola Valles; Reinaldo Gutierrez; Latifa Ayada; Rony Zachariah; Abdi Yassin; Sven Gudmund Hinderaker; Anthony D Harries Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman; Julia Dixon; Andrew Lamp; Shaheem de Vries; Brenda Beaty; Lani Finck; Kathryn Colborn; Kubendhren Moodley; Amanda Skenadore; Russell E Glasgow; Edward P Havranek; Vikhyat S Bebarta; Adit A Ginde Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2019-12-05
Authors: Julia Dixon; Taylor Burkholder; Jennifer Pigoga; Michael Lee; Kubendhren Moodley; Shaheem de Vries; Lee Wallis; Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2021-10-30
Authors: Andrea Conti; Daniela Sacchetto; Giovanni Putoto; Marcello Mazzotta; Giovanna De Meneghi; Emanuela De Vivo; Lorenzo Lora Ronco; Ives Hubloue; Francesco Della Corte; Francesco Barone-Adesi; Luca Ragazzoni; Marta Caviglia Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 4.614