OBJECTIVE: To estimate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of triage ratings on Emergency Centre patients by South African nurses and doctors using the South African Triage Scale (SATS). METHODS: A cross-sectional reliability study was performed. Five emergency physicians and ten enrolled nursing assistants independently assigned triage categories to 100 written vignettes unaware of the ratings given by others. Four different quantitative reliability measures were calculated and compared. Graphical displays portrayed rating distributions for vignettes with mean ratings at different acuity categories. RESULTS: The estimated quadratically weighted kappa for the group of emergency physicians was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67-0.84) and for the group of nurses 0.66 (95% CI: 0.58-0.74). These values were close to the estimated intra-class correlation coefficients. For intra-rater reliability, the average exact agreement was 84%. The graphical displays showed that the least variability was evident in the vignettes that had a mean rating of 'emergency', 'very urgent' or 'routine'. CONCLUSION: This study indicates good inter- and intra-rater reliability among nurses and doctors using the SATS. It suggests that the SATS is reliably applied, and supports the feasibility of further implementation of the SATS in similar settings.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of triage ratings on Emergency Centre patients by South African nurses and doctors using the South African Triage Scale (SATS). METHODS: A cross-sectional reliability study was performed. Five emergency physicians and ten enrolled nursing assistants independently assigned triage categories to 100 written vignettes unaware of the ratings given by others. Four different quantitative reliability measures were calculated and compared. Graphical displays portrayed rating distributions for vignettes with mean ratings at different acuity categories. RESULTS: The estimated quadratically weighted kappa for the group of emergency physicians was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67-0.84) and for the group of nurses 0.66 (95% CI: 0.58-0.74). These values were close to the estimated intra-class correlation coefficients. For intra-rater reliability, the average exact agreement was 84%. The graphical displays showed that the least variability was evident in the vignettes that had a mean rating of 'emergency', 'very urgent' or 'routine'. CONCLUSION: This study indicates good inter- and intra-rater reliability among nurses and doctors using the SATS. It suggests that the SATS is reliably applied, and supports the feasibility of further implementation of the SATS in similar settings.
Authors: Andrew Gardner; Paa Kobina Forson; George Oduro; Barclay Stewart; Nkechi Dike; Paul Glover; Ronald F Maio Journal: Injury Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Temmy Sunyoto; Rafael Van den Bergh; Pola Valles; Reinaldo Gutierrez; Latifa Ayada; Rony Zachariah; Abdi Yassin; Sven Gudmund Hinderaker; Anthony D Harries Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Bérangère Gohy; Engy Ali; Rafael Van den Bergh; Erin Schillberg; Masood Nasim; Muhammad Mahmood Naimi; Sophia Cheréstal; Pauline Falipou; Eric Weerts; Peter Skelton; Catherine Van Overloop; Miguel Trelles Journal: Int Health Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 2.473
Authors: Carl Otto Schell; Markus Castegren; Edwin Lugazia; Jonas Blixt; Moses Mulungu; David Konrad; Tim Baker Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2015-07-25
Authors: Bhakti Hansoti; David Stead; Andy Parrish; Steven J Reynolds; Andrew D Redd; Madeleine M Whalen; Nomzamo Mvandaba; Thomas C Quinn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ayesha Khan; S V Mahadevan; Andrea Dreyfuss; James Quinn; Joan Woods; Koy Somontha; Matthew Strehlow Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 2.740