Literature DB >> 23021604

Effect of a personal weight transfer device on muscle activities and joint flexions in the stooped posture.

Brent L Ulrey1, Fadi A Fathallah.   

Abstract

Repetitive work in the stooped posture is a known risk factor for developing low back disorders (LBDs); regardless, the stooped posture is widespread throughout the world in the agriculture, construction, and mining industries. An on-body weight transfer device was tested as a possible intervention for reducing the risk of developing LBDs. Eighteen subjects (11 male and 7 female), with no history of LBDs, performed stooped posture tasks in the laboratory. Surface electromyograms of the erector spinae, rectus abdominis, biceps femoris, and tibialis anterior muscles were recorded. Bodily joint flexions were measured with a combination of inclinometers and electrogoniometers. When wearing the device in the stooped posture, biceps femoris activity and lumbar flexion were significantly reduced. Subjects who did not experience flexion-relaxation had a significant reduction in lumbar erector spinae activity. By reducing back muscle activity, and by limiting lumbar flexion, the device could reduce the risk of developing LBDs for those who work while adopting the stooped posture. The device may also be beneficial for those with existing LBDs. Follow up field studies are needed to confirm the long-term potential benefits of such an intervention approach.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23021604     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  8 in total

1.  Effects of volitional spine stabilization on lifting task in recurrent low back pain population.

Authors:  Ram Haddas; James Yang; Isador Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effects of Volitional Spine Stabilization on Trunk Control During Asymmetric Lifting Task in Patients With Recurrent Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Ram Haddas; Yigal Samocha; James Yang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-10-28

3.  Passive Back Support Exoskeleton Improves Range of Motion Using Flexible Beams.

Authors:  Matthias B Näf; Axel S Koopman; Saskia Baltrusch; Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero; Bram Vanderborght; Dirk Lefeber
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2018-06-21

Review 4.  Review of Current Spinal Robotic Orthoses.

Authors:  Siu Kei David Mak; Dino Accoto
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-13

5.  Effects of a Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton on Knee Joint Loading during Simulated Static Sorting and Dynamic Lifting Tasks.

Authors:  Mona Bär; Tessy Luger; Robert Seibt; Julia Gabriel; Monika A Rieger; Benjamin Steinhilber
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Passive Trunk Exoskeleton Acceptability and Effects on Self-efficacy in Employees with Low-Back Pain: A Mixed Method Approach.

Authors:  S J Baltrusch; H Houdijk; J H van Dieën; J Th C M de Kruif
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03

7.  Guidelines for Working Heights of the Lower-Limb Exoskeleton (CEX) Based on Ergonomic Evaluations.

Authors:  Yong-Ku Kong; Chae-Won Park; Min-Uk Cho; Seoung-Yeon Kim; Min-Jung Kim; Dong Jin Hyun; Kihyeon Bae; Jong Kyu Choi; Sang Min Ko; Kyeong-Hee Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Feasibility of a Biomechanically-Assistive Garment to Reduce Low Back Loading During Leaning and Lifting.

Authors:  Erik P Lamers; Aaron J Yang; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.538

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.