Literature DB >> 33449434

Fetal radiation dose of four tube voltages in abdominal CT examinations during pregnancy: A phantom study.

Yuta Matsunaga1,2, Tomonobu Haba3, Masanao Kobayashi3, Shoichi Suzuki3, Yasuki Asada3, Koichi Chida2.   

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the dose and noise level of four tube voltages in abdominal computerized tomography (CT) examinations in different abdominal circumference sizes of pregnant women. Fetal radiation doses were measured with two anthropomorphic pregnant phantoms and real-time dosimeters of photoluminescence sensors using four tube voltages for abdominal CT. The noise level was measured at the abdomen of two anthropomorphic pregnant phantoms. In the large pregnant phantom, the mean fetal doses performed using 120 and 135 kV were statistically significantly lower than the lower tube voltages (P < 0.05). In the small pregnant phantom, the mean fetal dose performed by 100, 120, and 135 kV was significantly lower than the lowest tube voltage tested (P < 0.05). The ratios of the peripheral mean dose to the centric mean dose showed that the ratios of 80 kV were the highest and those for 135 kV were the lowest in both pregnant phantoms. The ratios of the peripheral mean dose to the centric mean dose decreased as the tube voltage increased. Compared with low tube voltages, high tube voltages such as 120 and 135 kV could reduce radiation doses to the fetus without compromising the image uniformity in abdominal CT examinations during pregnancy. On low tube voltage protocols, the dose near the maternal skin surface may be increased in large pregnant women because of reduced penetration of the x rays.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fetal CT; fetal radiation dose; pregnant model; tube voltage

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33449434      PMCID: PMC7882097          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  31 in total

1.  Estimated fetal radiation dose from multislice CT studies.

Authors:  J P Felmlee; J E Gray; M L Leetzow; J C Price
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Fetal radiation dose from CT pulmonary angiography in late pregnancy: a phantom study.

Authors:  S K Doshi; I S Negus; J M Oduko
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector.

Authors:  Koichi Chida; Yohei Inaba; Haruo Saito; Tadashi Ishibashi; Shoki Takahashi; Masahiro Kohzuki; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Effect of tube current modulation for dose estimation using a simulation tool on body CT examination.

Authors:  Ai Kawaguchi; Yuta Matsunaga; Masanao Kobayashi; Shoichi Suzuki; Kosuke Matsubara; Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Real-time patient radiation dosimeter for use in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Koichi Chida; Mamoru Kato; Yohei Inaba; Ryota Kobayashi; Masaaki Nakamura; Yoshihisa Abe; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  Fetal radiation dose in three common CT examinations during pregnancy - Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  A Kelaranta; T Mäkelä; T Kaasalainen; M Kortesniemi
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  PATIENT EXPOSURE DURING PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY AND MAMMOGRAPHY IN JAPAN IN 1974-2014.

Authors:  Yuta Matsunaga; Ai Kawaguchi; Kenichi Kobayashi; Masanao Kobayashi; Yasuki Asada; Kazuyuki Minami; Shoichi Suzuki; Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 0.972

8.  Radiation doses for pregnant women in the late pregnancy undergoing fetal-computed tomography: a comparison of dosimetry and Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Yuta Matsunaga; Ai Kawaguchi; Masanao Kobayashi; Shigetaka Suzuki; Shoichi Suzuki; Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-09-19

9.  Assessment of an organ-based tube current modulation in thoracic computed tomography.

Authors:  Kosuke Matsubara; Mai Sugai; Asami Toyoda; Haruka Koshida; Keita Sakuta; Tadanori Takata; Kichiro Koshida; Hiroji Iida; Osamu Matsui
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  New real-time patient radiation dosimeter for use in radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Authors:  Mamoru Kato; Koichi Chida; Masaaki Nakamura; Hideto Toyoshima; Ken Terata; Yoshihisa Abe
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.724

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?

Authors:  Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-05-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.