OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of direct miniplate anchorage in conjunction with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FFRD) in treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Forty-eight females with skeletal Class II were randomly allocated to the Forsus plus miniplates (FMP) group (16 patients, age 12.5 ± 0.9 years), Forsus alone (FFRD; 16 patients, age 12.1± 0.9 years), or the untreated control group (16 subjects, age 12.1 ± 0.9 years). After leveling and alignment, miniplates were inserted in the mandibular symphysis in the FMP group. The FFRD was inserted directly on the miniplates in the FMP group and onto the mandibular archwires in the FFRD group. The appliances were removed after reaching an edge-to-edge incisor relationship. RESULTS: Data from 46 subjects were analyzed. The effective mandibular length significantly increased in the FMP group only (4.05 ± 0.78). The mandibular incisors showed a significant proclination in the FFRD group (9.17 ± 2.42) and a nonsignificant retroclination in the FMP group (-1.49 ± 4.70). The failure rate of the miniplates was reported to be 13.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of miniplates with the FFRD was successful in increasing the effective mandibular length in Class II malocclusion subjects in the short term. The miniplate-anchored FFRD eliminated the unfavorable mandibular incisor proclination in contrast to the conventional FFRD.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of direct miniplate anchorage in conjunction with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FFRD) in treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight females with skeletal Class II were randomly allocated to the Forsus plus miniplates (FMP) group (16 patients, age 12.5 ± 0.9 years), Forsus alone (FFRD; 16 patients, age 12.1 ± 0.9 years), or the untreated control group (16 subjects, age 12.1 ± 0.9 years). After leveling and alignment, miniplates were inserted in the mandibular symphysis in the FMP group. The FFRD was inserted directly on the miniplates in the FMP group and onto the mandibular archwires in the FFRD group. The appliances were removed after reaching an edge-to-edge incisor relationship. RESULTS: Data from 46 subjects were analyzed. The effective mandibular length significantly increased in the FMP group only (4.05 ± 0.78). The mandibular incisors showed a significant proclination in the FFRD group (9.17 ± 2.42) and a nonsignificant retroclination in the FMP group (-1.49 ± 4.70). The failure rate of the miniplates was reported to be 13.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of miniplates with the FFRD was successful in increasing the effective mandibular length in Class II malocclusion subjects in the short term. The miniplate-anchored FFRD eliminated the unfavorable mandibular incisor proclination in contrast to the conventional FFRD.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anchorage; Class II malocclusion; Fixed functional appliance; Forsus; Growth; Miniplates
Authors: Marie A Cornelis; Nicole R Scheffler; Catherine Nyssen-Behets; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Michiel R de Boer; Wilma E Waterlander; Lothar D J Kuijper; Ingrid H M Steenhuis; Jos W R Twisk Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2015-01-24 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Sherif A Elkordy; Ramy Abdeldayem; Mona M S Fayed; Ibrahim Negm; Dina El Ghoul; Amr M Abouelezz Journal: Angle Orthod Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 2.079
Authors: Maged S Alhammadi; Amal Abdulsalam A Qasem; Aisha Mohammed S Yamani; Rawan Duhduh A Duhduh; Rahaf T Alshahrani; Esam Halboub; Abeer A Almashraqi Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 3.747